Mammalian Biology

, Volume 92, Issue 1, pp 102–110 | Cite as

Home ranges, activity patterns and habitat preferences of leopards in Luambe National Park and adjacent Game Management Area in the Luangwa Valley, Zambia

  • Rena Rebecca Ray-BrambachEmail author
  • Claudia Stommel
  • Dennis Rödder
Original investigation


Leopard (Panthera pardus) populations are declining worldwide. There are limited data on leopard ecology, especially activity patterns and habitat use, but these are vital to facilitate their conservation. In Zambia we radio tracked two female and three male leopards to study home range sizes, activity patterns and habitat preferences in Luambe National Park (LNP), and an adjacent Game Management Area used for trophy hunting. Home range sizes (MCP 95%) comprised 28.3–55.7 km2 for males and 3.1–42.3 km2 for females; Kernel densities (50%; 95%) were 32.5–80.6 km2 for males and 3.0-23.0 km2 for females. The home range for one female shrank during motherhood. Analysis of habitat use and activity patterns of leopards revealed sex-specific differences. Males showed a higher mobility than females. During 24-h observations all individuals showed a minimum mobility during noon hours and maximum mobility before sunrise and sunset. Analyses of habitat preferences using the Jacob-Index and R package adehabitatHS showed that leopards prefer denser vegetation types and rather avoid grassland. These findings should be taken into account in conservation decisions, for example in the granting of trophy hunting activities.


Panthera pardus Ecology Radio tracking Southern Africa Hunting area 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anderson, N.E., 2009. An Investigation into the Ecology of Trypanosmiasis in Wildlife of the Luangwa Valley, Zambia. (PhD-Thesis). University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  2. Bailey, T.N., 2005. The African Leopard: Ecology and Behaviour of a Solitary Felid. Blackburn Press, Caldwell, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  3. Balme, G.A., Hunter, L.T.B., 2013. Why leopards commit infanticide. Anim. Behav. 86, 791–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Balme, G.A., Hunter, L., Braczkowski, A.R., 2012. Applicability of age-based hunting regulations for African leopards. PLoS One 7, e35209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Balme, G.A., Lindsey, P.A., Swanepoel, L.H., Hunter, L.T.B., 2014. Failure of research to address the rangewide conservation needs of large carnivores: leopards in South Africa as a case study. Conserv. Lett. 7 (1), 3–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bauer, H., 2008. Synthesis of threats, distribution and status of the lion from the two lion conservation strategies. In: Croes, B., Buij, R., de Longh, H., Bauer, H. (Eds.), Management and Conservation of Large Carnivores in West and Central Africa. Institute of Environmental Sciences (CML). Leiden University, pp. 13–28.Google Scholar
  7. Bauer, H., Packer, C., Funston, P.F., Henschel, P., Nowell, K., 2016. Panthera leo. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2016:e.T15951A97162455 (downloaded 07 November 2016).Google Scholar
  8. Bertram, B.C.R., 1975. Social factors influencing reproduction in wild lions. J. Zool. Lond. 177, 463–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bothma, J. Du P., 1997. Leopard ecology in southern Africa. In: Van Heerden, J. (Ed.), Proceedings of a Symposium on Lions and Leopards as Game Ranch Animals. Wildlife Group, South African Veterinary Association, Onderstepoort, pp. 27–36.Google Scholar
  10. Bothma, J. Du P., Knight, M.H., LeRiche, E.A.N., Van Hensbergen, HJ., 1997. Range size of southern Kalahari leopards. S. Afr. J. Wildl. Res. 7 (3), 94–99.Google Scholar
  11. Calenge, C., 2006. The package adehabitat for the R software: a tool for the analysis of space and habitat use by animals. Ecol. Modell. 197, 516–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Caro, T., Young, C., Cauldwell, A., Brown, D., 2009. Animal breeding systems and big game hunting. Models Appl, Biol. Conserv. 142, 909–929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Davies, K.E.M., Boersma, P.D., 1984. Why lionesses copulate with more than one male. Am. Nat. 123, 594–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hamilton, P.H., 1976. The Movements of Leopards in Tsavo National Park Kenya, as Determined by Radio Tracking. Master Thesis. University of Nairobi, Nairobi.Google Scholar
  15. Harris, S., Cresswell, W.J., Forde, P.G., Trewhella, W.J., Woolard, T., Wray, R., 1990. Home range analysis using radio tracking data-a review of problems and techniques particularly as applied to the study of mammals. Mammal. Rev. 20, 97–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hayward, M.W., Henschel, P., O’Brien, J., Hofmeyr, M., Balme, G., Kerley, G.I.H., 2006. Prey preferences of the leopard (Panthera pardus). J. Zool. 270 (2), 298–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Henschel, P., Azani, D., Burton, C., Malanda, G., Saidu, Y., Sam, M., Hunter, L., 2010. Lion status update from five range countries in West and Central Africa. Cat News 52, 34–39.Google Scholar
  18. Hooge, P.N., Eichenlaub, W., Solomon, E., 1999. The Animal Movement Program. USGS, Alaska Biological Science Center.Google Scholar
  19. Hrdy, S.B., 1974. Male-male competition and infanticide among the langurs (Presbytis entellus) of Abu Rajasthan. Folia. Primatol. 22, 19–58.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Hunter, L., Henschel, P., Ray, J.C., 2013. Panthera pardus. In: Kingdon, J.S., Hoffmann, M. (Eds.), Mammals of Africa Volume V: Carnivores, Pangolins, Equids and Rhinoceroses. Bloomsbury, London, p. 544.Google Scholar
  21. Jacobs, J., 1974. Quantitative measurements of food selection: a modification ofthe forage ratio and Ivelve’s Electivity Index. Oecologia 14, 413–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jacobson, A.P., Gerngross, P., Lemeris, J.R., Schoonover, R., Anco, C., Breitenmoser-Wursten, C., Durant, S., Farhadinia, M.S., Henschel, P., Kamler, J., Laguardia, A., Rostro-Garcia, S., Stein, A.B., Dollar, L., 2016. Leopard (Panthera pardus) status, distribution, and the research efforts across its range. Peer J. 4, e1974,
  23. Jenny, D., Zuberbühler, K., 2005. Hunting behaviour in West African forest leopards. Afri. J. Ecol. 43, 197–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kernohan, B.J., Gitzen, R.A., Millspaugh, J.J., 2001. Analysis of animal space use and movements. In: Millspaugh, J.J., Marzluff, J.M. (Eds.), Radio Tracking Animal Populations. Academic Press, San Diego, California, USA, pp. 125–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kingdon, J., 2007. Field Guide to African Mammals. A & C Black Publishers, London.Google Scholar
  26. Kruuk, H., 1986. Interactions between Felidae and their prey species: a review. In: Miller, S.D., Everett, D.D. (Eds.), Cats ofthe World: Biology, Conservation and Management. National Wildlife Federation, Washington, pp. 353–374.Google Scholar
  27. Mühlenberg, M., 1993. Freilandökologie. UTB Verlag, Heidelberg.Google Scholar
  28. Manly, B.F.J., McDonald, L.L., Thomas, D.L., McDonald, T.L., Erickson, W.P., 2003. Resource Selection by Animals — Statistical Design and Analysis for Field Studies, second edition. Kluwer academic publishers, London.Google Scholar
  29. Martins, Q., Harris, S., 2013. Movement, activity and hunting behaviour of leopards in the Cederberg mountains, South Africa. Afr. J. Ecol. 5, 571–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mizutani, F., Jewell, P.A., 1998. Home range and movements of leopards (Panthera pardus) on a livestock ranch in Kenya. J. Zool. 244, 269–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mohr, C.O., 1947. Table of equivalent populations of North American small mammals. Am. Midl. Nat. 2, 223–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nowell, K., Jackson, P., 1996. Wild Cats. Status Survey and Conservation Action Plan. IUCN/SSC Cat Specialist Group, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
  33. Odden, M., Wegge, P., 2005. Spacing and activity patterns of leopards (Panthera pardus) in Royal Bardia National Park, Nepal. Wildl. Biol. 11, 145–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Odden, M., Athreya, V., Rattan, S., Linnell, J.D.C., 2014. Adaptable Neighbours: movement patterns of GPS-collared leopards in human dominated landscapes in India. PloS One 9 (11), e112044.Google Scholar
  35. Packer, C., Pusey, A.E., 1983. Male takeovers and female reproductive parameters: a simulation of oestrus synchrony in lions (Panthera leo). Anim. Behav. 31, 334–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Packer, C., Pusey, A.E., 1984. Infanticide in carnivores. In: Hausfater, G., Hrdy, S.B. (Eds.), Infanticide: Comparative and Evolutionary Perspectives. Aldine, New York, pp. 31–42.Google Scholar
  37. Powell, R.A., 2000. Animal home ranges and territories and home range estimators. In: Boitoni, I., Fuller, T.K. (Eds.), Research Techniques in Animal Ecology: Controversies and Consequences. Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 65–110.Google Scholar
  38. Purchase, G., Mateke, C., 2008. The state of knowledge regarding leopard (Panthera pardus) in three range states (Mozambique, Zambia and Zimbabwe) in the context of improving management of trophy hunting. Report. CAMPFIRE Association of Zimbabwe, Harare.Google Scholar
  39. Purchase, G., Mateke, C., Purchase, D.M., 2007. A review ofthe status and distribution of carnivores, and levels of human carnivore conflict, in the protected areas and surrounds of Zambesi Basin. Report (pp 85).Google Scholar
  40. Ray, J.C., Hunter, L.T.B., Zigourius, J., 2005. Setting Conservation and Research Priorities for Larger African Carnivores. WCS Working Paper 24. Wildlife Conservation Society. IUCN, 2008, New York.Google Scholar
  41. Ray, R.R., 2011. The ecology and population status and impact of trophy hunting of the leopard Panthera pardus (LINNAEUS, 1758) in the Luambe National Park and surrounding Game Management Areas in Zambia. PhD-Thesis. University of Bonn.Google Scholar
  42. Ripple, W., Estes, J., Beschta, R., Wilmers, C.C., Ritchie, E.G., Hebblewhite, M., Berger, J., Elmhagen, B., Letnic, M., Nelson, M.P., Schmitz, O.J., Smith, D.W., Wallach, A.D., Wirsing, A.J., 2014. Status and ecological effects ofthe world’s largest carnivores. Science 343 (6167), 1241484.Google Scholar
  43. Rosenblatt, E.S., Creel, S., Becker, M.S., Merkle, J., Mwape, H., Schuette, P., Simpamba, T., 2016. Effects of a protection gradient on carnivore density and survival: an example with leopards in the Luangwa valley, Zambia. Ecol. Evol. 6 (11), 3772–3785, Scholar
  44. Schmidt, K., 1999. Variation in daily activity of free-living Eurasian lynx (Lynx lynx) in Bialowieza Primeval Forest, Poland. J. Zool. 249, 417–425.Google Scholar
  45. Schulz, J., 1983. Zambia. Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, Darmstadt.Google Scholar
  46. Seaman, D.E., Powell, R.A., 1996. An evaluation ofthe accuracy of kernel density estimators for home range analysis. Ecology 77 (7), 2075–2085.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Skinner, J.D., Chimimba, C.T., 2005. The Mammals ofthe Southern African Subregion. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Smith, J.L.D., 1993. The role of dispersal in structuring the Chitwan tiger population. Behaviour 124, 165–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Stander, P.E., Haden, P.J., Kaqece, I.I., Ghau, I.I., 1997. The ecology of asociality in Namibian leopards. J. Zool. 242, 343–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Stander, P.E., 1997. Field age determination of leopards by tooth wear. Afr. J. Ecol. 35, 156–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Stein, A.B., Athreya, V., Gerngross, P., Balme, G., Henschel, P., Karanth, U., Miquelle, D., Rostro, S., Kamler, J.F., Laguardia, A., 2016. Panthera pardus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2016: e.T15954A50659089 (downloaded 03.11.2016).Google Scholar
  52. Sunquist, M., Sunquist, F., 2002. Wild Cats ofthe World. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Thomas, D.L. Taylor, E.J., 1990. Study designs and tests for comparing resource use and availability. J. Wildl. Manage. 54, 322–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wassmer, D.A., Guenther, D.D., Layne, J.N., 1988. Ecology ofthe bobcat in South-Central Florida. Bull. Fla. Mus. Nat. Hist. 33, 1–228.Google Scholar
  55. White, G.C., Garrot, R.A., 1990. Analysis of Wildlife Radio-tracking Data. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  56. Wilcoxon, F., 1945. Individual comparisons by ranking methods. Biometrics 1 (6), 80–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wolf, C., Ripple, W.J., 2017. Range contractions ofthe world’s large carnivores. R. Soc. Open Sci. 4.Google Scholar
  58. Worton, B.J., 1989. Kernel methods for estimating the utilization distribution in home-range studies. Ecology 70 (1), 164–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wronski, T., Apio, A., Plath, M., 2006. Activity patterns of bushbuck (Tragelaphus scriptus) in queen Elizabeth national park. Behav. Process. 73, 333–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Ydenberg, R.C., Giraldeau, L.A., Falls, J.B., 1988. Neighbours, strangers and the asymmetric war of attrition. Anim. Behav. 36, 343–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Deutsche Gesellschaft für Säugetierkunde 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rena Rebecca Ray-Brambach
    • 1
    Email author
  • Claudia Stommel
    • 1
  • Dennis Rödder
    • 1
  1. 1.Zoological Research Museum Alexander KoenigBonnGermany

Personalised recommendations