Tree thinking and species delimitation: Guidelines for taxonomy and phylogenetic terminology
Abstract
By tradition, phylogenetic trees are presented in such a way that species-poor taxa are placed on the left side and their more diverse sister taxa on the right (usually with humans on the far right). This often leads to reading the tree as a “ladder of progress” from left (allegedly primitive, basal or even ancestral) to right (allegedly advanced, derived, descendant). Although biologically and logically wrong and often bemoaned, the evolutionary literature teems with language perpetuating this phylogenetic misconception. Likewise, the splitting of one into two or more species based on different versions of the Phylogenetic Species Concept has recently found a growing number of adherents, resulting, in the eyes of many, in a trivialization of the species category (“taxonomic inflation”). This editorial briefly summarizes these phylogenetic and taxonomic issues and provides guidelines to authors submitting their studies to Mammalian Biology in order to avoid errors in phylogenetic discussions and to do justice to the fundamental nature of species in biology.
Keywords
Phylogenetic trees “Primitive lineage fallacy” Scala naturae Species concepts Species splittingReferences
- Agapow, P.M., Bininda-Emonds, O.R.P., Crandall, K.A., Gittleman, J.L., Mace, G.M., Marshall, J.C., Purvis, A., 2004. The impact of species concept on biodiversity studies, Q. Rev. Biol. 79, 161–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Baum, D.A., Smith, S.D., Donovan, S.S.S., 2005. The tree-thinking challenge, Science 310, 979–980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Cotterill, F.P.D., Taylor, P.J., Gippoliti, S., Bishop, J.M., Groves, C.P., 2014. Why one century of phenetics is enough: response to ‘Are there really twice as many bovid species as we thought?’, Syst. Biol. 63, 819–832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Frankham, R., Ballou, J.D., Dudash, M.R., Eldridge, M.D.B., Fenster, C.B., Lacy, R.C., Mendelson III, J.R., Porton, I.J., Ralls, K., Ryder, O.A., 2012. Implications of different species concepts for conserving biodiversity, Biol. Conserv. 153, 25–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gippoliti, S., Groves, C.P., 2012. “Taxonomic inflation” in the historical context of mammalogy and conservation, Hystrix It. J. Mammal. 23, 6–9.Google Scholar
- Groves, C.P., 2013. The nature of species: a rejoinder to Zachos et al. Mammal. Biol., 7–9.Google Scholar
- Heller, R., Frandsen, P., Lorenzen, E.D., Siegismund, H.R., 2013. Are there really twice as many bovid species as we thought? Syst, Biol. 62, 490–493.Google Scholar
- Heller, R., Frandsen, P., Lorenzen, E.D., Siegismund, H.R., 2014. Is diagnosability an indicator of speciation? Response to “Why one century of phenetics is enough”, Syst. Biol. 63, 833–837.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Isaac, J.B., Mallet, J., Mace, G.M., 2004. Taxonomic inflation: its influence on macroe-cology and conservation, Trends Ecol. Evol. 19, 464–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Krell, F.T., Cranston, P.S., 2004. Which side of the tree is more basal? Syst, Entomol. 29, 279–281.Google Scholar
- Lovejoy, A.O., 1936. The Great Chain of Being: A Study of the History of an Idea. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- Marris, E., 2007. The species and the specious, Nature 446, 250–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Omland, K.E., Cook, L.G., Crisp, M.D., 2008. Tree thinking for all biology: the problem with reading phylogenies as ladders of progress, BioEssays 30, 854–867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rigato, E., Minelli, A., 2013. The great chain of being is still there. Evol. Educ. Outreach 6, 18.Google Scholar
- Zachos, F.E., 2015. Taxonomic inflation, the Phylogenetic Species Concept and lineages in the Tree of Life - a cautionary comment on species splitting, J. Zool. Syst. Evol. Res. 53, 180–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Zachos, F.E., 2015. Species concepts and species delimitation in mammals. In: Zachos, F.E., Asher, R. (Eds.), Mammalian Evolution, Diversity and Systematics. Handbook of Zoology, Mammalia Series. DeGruyter, Berlin, ISBN 978–3-11-027590-2 (in press).Google Scholar
- Zachos, F.E., Apollonio, M., Bärmann, E.V., Festa-Bianchet, M., Göhlich, U, Habel, J.C, Haring, E., Kruckenhauser, L, Lovari, S., McDevitt, A.D., Pertoldi, C, Rössner, G.E., Sánchez-Villagra, M.R., Scandura, M., Suchentrunk, F., 2013a. Species inflation and taxonomic artefacts - a critical comment on recent trends in mammalian classification. Mammal. Biol. 78, 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Zachos, F.E., Clutton-Brock, T.H., Festa-Bianchet, M., Lovari, S., Macdonald, D.W., Schaller, G.B., 2013b. Species splitting puts conservation at risk. Nature 494, 35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar