Advertisement

Mammalian Biology

, Volume 80, Issue 6, pp 468–476 | Cite as

Spatial and temporal circumstances affecting the population growth of beavers

  • Kamila ŠimůnkováEmail author
  • Aleš Vorel
Original Investigation
First Online:

Abstract

Understanding the spreading patterns of an invading or expanding species is necessary for ecological theory and conservation. The return of the Eurasian beaver throughout Europe is considered one of the biggest conservation success stories. In general, the process of the spreading beaver population has been described in detail, however several aspects regarding the principles of colonisation have not been mentioned. We propose that the process of colonisation should follow Skellam’s model for the case of first occupation by a pioneer beaver during the establishment of population growth.

We retrospectively reconstructed the continuous colonisation of Eurasian beavers in six catchments in Western Bohemia in the Czech Republic. The extracted data from published resources were analysed to reveal (in detail) the progress of the colonisation front, in addition to considering current population densities in the catchments. All of the catchments were settled from one possible source, but were reached by pioneer beavers regardless of the distance or the considered source of the spread. However, an increased distance from the source of spread delayed the start of rapid population growth. The barrier effect among the divides of the watershed was not substantial because beavers regularly crossed the divides. The progress of the colonisation front followed Skellam’s diffusion model as densities spread from sites with higher values into areas with lower values. The model did not, however, accurately predict the pattern of the first pioneer occupancy.

Keywords

Dispersal Colonisation Source of spread Castor fibre 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andersone, Z., Ozolins, J., 2004. Food habits of wolves Canis lupus in Latvia. Acta Theriol. 49, 357–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baker, B.W., Hill, E.P., 2003. Beaver (Castor canadensis). In: Feldhamer, G.A., Thompson, B.C., Chapman, J.A. (Eds.), Wild Mammals of North America., second ed. John Hopkins Univ. Press, Baltimore, MD, pp. 288–310.Google Scholar
  3. Balodis, M., 1990. The Beaver. Biology and Management in Latvia. Zinátne, Riga.Google Scholar
  4. Barták, V., Vorel, A., Símová, P., Pus, V., 2013. Spatial spread of Eurasian beavers in river networks: a comparison of range expansion rates. J. Anim. Ecol. 82, 587–597.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Busher, P.E., Lyons, P.J., 1999. Long–term population dynamics of North American beaver, Castor canadensis, on Quabbin Reservation, Massachusetts, and Sagehen Creek California. In: Busher, P.E., Dzieciolowski, R.M. (Eds.), Beaver Protection, Management, and Utilization in Europe and North America. Kluwer Academic/Plenum, New York, pp. 147–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Červený, J., Málková, P., Bufka, L., 2000. Současné rozšíření bobra evropského (Castor fiber) v západních a jižních Čechách (The current distribution of the beaver (Castor fiber) in southwestern Bohemia (Czech Republic)). Lynx 31, 13–22 (in Czech with English summary).Google Scholar
  7. Chapron, G., Kaczensky, P., Linnell, J.D., Von Arx, M., Huber, D., Andrén, H., López–Bao, J.V., Adamec, M., Álvares, F., Anders, O., Balciauskas, L., Balys, V., Bed”o, P., Bego, F., Blanco, J.C., Breitenmoser, U., Brøseth, H., Bufka, L., Bunikyte, R., Ciucci, P., Dutsov, A., Engleder, T., Fuxjäger, C,. Groff, C., Holmala, K., Hoxha, B., Iliopoulos, Y., Ionescu, O., Jeremić, J., Jerina, K., Kluth, G., Knauer, F., Kojola, I., Kos, I., Krofel, M., Kubala, J., Kunovac, S., Kusak, J., Kutal, M., Liberg, O., Majić, A., Männil, P., Manz, R., Marboutin, E., Marucco, F., Melovski, D., Mersini, K., Mertzanis, Y., Mysłajek, R.W., Nowak, S., Odden, J., Ozolins, J., Palomero, G., Paunovic, M., Persson, J., Potočnik, H., Quenette, P.Y., Rauer, G., Reinhardt, I., Rigg, R., Ryser, A., Salvatori, V., Skrbinšek, T., Stojanov, A., Swenson, J.E., Szemethy, L., Trajce, A., Tsingarska-Sedefcheva, E., Váňa, M., Veeroja, R., Wabakken, P., Wölfl, M., Wölfl, S., Zimmermann, F., Zlatanova, D., Boitani, L., 2014. Recovery of large carnivores in Europe’s modern human-dominated landscapes. Science 346,1517–1519.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. DeStefano, S., Koenen, K.K.G., Henner, CM., Strules, J., 2006. Transition to independence by subadult beavers (Castor canadensis) in an unexploited, exponentially growing population. J. Zool. 269, 434–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fustec, J., Lode, T., Le Jacques, D., Cormier, J.P., 2001. Colonization, riparian habitat selection and home range size in a reintroduced population of European beavers in the Loire. Freshw. Biol. 46, 1361–1371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gilbert, M., Liebhold, A., 2010. Comparing methods for measuring the rate of spread of invading populations. Ecography 33, 809–817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Halley, D., Rosell, F., 2002. The beaver’s reconquest of Eurasia: status, population development and management of a conservation success. Mamm. Rev. 32, 153–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Halley, D., Rosell, F., Saveljev, A., 2012. Population and distribution of Eurasian beavers (Castorfiber). Baltic For. 18, 168–175.Google Scholar
  13. Halley, D., Teurlings, I., Welsh, H., Taylor, C., 2013. Distribution and patterns of spread of recolonising Eurasian beavers (Castorfiber Linnaeus 1758) in fragmented habitat, Agdenes peninsula, Norway. Fauna Nor. 32, 1–12.Google Scholar
  14. Hartman, G., 1994. Long–term population development of a reintroduced beaver (Castorfiber) population in Sweden. Conserv. Biol. 8, 713–717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hartman, G., 1995. Patterns of spread of a reintroduced beaver Castor fiber population in Sweden. Wildl. Biol. 1, 97–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hartman, G., 1997. Notes on age at dispersal of beaver (Castor fiber) in an expanding population. Can. J. Zool. 75, 959–962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Heidecke, D., 1984. Investigations of ecology and population dynamics of the European beaver. Zoologische Jahrbücher, Abteilung für Systematik 111, 1–41.Google Scholar
  18. Helle, E., Kauhala, K., 1991. Distribution history and present status of the raccoon dog in Finland. Ecography 14, 278–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hodgdon, H.E., Lancia, R.A., 1983. Behavior of the North American beaver, Castor canadensis. Acta Zool. Fenn. 174, 99–103.Google Scholar
  20. Leege, T.A., 1968. Natural movements of beavers in southeastern Idaho. J. Wildl. Manag. 32, 973–976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Liebhold, A.M., Tobin, P.C., 2008. Population ecology of insect invasions and their management. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 53, 387–408.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Lubina, J.A., Levin, S.A., 1988. The spread of a reinvading species: range expansion in the California sea otter. Am. Nat. 131, 526–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Müller-Schwarze, D., Schulte, B.A., 1999. Behavioral and ecological characteristics of a “climax” population of beaver (Castor canadensis). In: Busher, P.E., Dzieciolowski, R.M. (Eds.), Beaver Protection, Management, and Utilization in Europe and North America. Kluwer Academic-Plenum Publishers, New York, pp. 161–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nolet, B.A., Rosell, F., 1994. Territoriality and time budgets in beavers during sequential settlement. Can. J. Zool. 72, 1227–1237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nolet, B.A., Rosell, F., 1998. Comeback of the beaver Castor fiber: an overview of old and new conservation problems. Biol. Conserv. 83, 165–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Novak, M., 1987. Beaver. In: Novak, M., Baker, J.S., Obbard, M.E., Malloch, B. (Eds.), Wild Furbearer Management and Conservation in North America. Ontario Trappers Association, North Bay, Ontario, pp. 282–312.Google Scholar
  27. Pachinger, K., 1995. Occurrence and Life Perspectives of Beavers inthe Slovak Section of the Danube River. Gabickovo, part of the hydroelectric power project – environmental impact review Faculty of Natural Sciences. Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovakia, pp. 31–39.Google Scholar
  28. Parker, H., Rosell, F., 2003. Beaver management in Norway: a model for continental Europe? Lutra 46, 223–234.Google Scholar
  29. R Core Development Team, 2013. A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.Google Scholar
  30. Šafář, J., 2002. Novodobé rozšíření bobra evropského (Castor fiber L., 1758) v České republice (Modern distribution of the European beaver (Castor fiber L., 1758) in the Czech Republic). Příroda 13, 161–196 (in Czech with English summary).Google Scholar
  31. Saveljev, A.P., Stubbe, M., Stubbe, A., Unzhakov, V.V., Kononov, S.V., 2002. Natural movements of tagged beavers in Tyva. Russ. J. Ecol. 33, 434–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Schadt, S., Revilla, E., Wiegand, T., Knauer, F., Kaczensky, P., Breitenmoser, U., Bufka, L., Červený, J., Koubek, P., Huber, T., Staniša, C., Trepl, L., 2002. Assessing the suitability of central European landscapes forthe reintroduction of Eurasian lynx. J. Appl. Ecol. 39, 189–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Schaper, F., 1976. Wiedereinbürgerung von Bibern-Entwicklung einer Biberkolonie bei Nürnberg. Mitt. Zool. Ges. Braunau 2, 281–342.Google Scholar
  34. Schwab, G., 2009. Biber in Bayern. Biologie und Management. Bayerisches Landesamt für Umwelt, Augsburg.Google Scholar
  35. Schwab, G., Schmidbauer, M., 2003. Beaver (Castor fiber L., Castoridae) management in Bavaria. Denisia 9, 99–106.Google Scholar
  36. Skellam, J.G., 1951. Random dispersal in theoretical populations. Biometrika38, 196–218.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Smith, D.W., Peterson, R.O., 1988. The effects of regulated lake levels on beaver in Voyageurs National Park, Minnesota. US Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Midwest Regional Office, Omaha, Nebraska.Google Scholar
  38. Sun, L., Müller–Schwarze, D., Schulte, B.A., 2000. Dispersal pattern and effective population size of the beaver. Can. J. Zool. 78, 393–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Svendsen, G.E., 1989. Pair formation, duration of pair-bonds, and mate replacement in a population of beavers (Castor canadensis). Can. J. Zool. 67, 336–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Usher, M.B., Kornberg, H., Horwood, J.W., Southwood, R., Moore, P.D., 1986. Invasibility and wildlife conservation: invasive species on nature reserves [and discussion]. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 314, 695–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Veron, G., 1992. Histoire biogeographique du castor d’Europe, Castor fiber. Mammalia 56, 87–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Vorel, A., Šafář, J., Šimunková, K., 2012. Recentní rozšíření bobra evropského (Castor fiber) v České republice v letech 2002–2012 (Rodentia: Castoridae) (Recent expansion of Castor fiber in the Czech Republic during 2002–2012 (Rodentia: Castoridae)). Lynx 43, 149–179 (in Czech with English summary).Google Scholar
  43. Vorel, A., Mokry, J., Šimůnková, K., 2014. Růst populace bobra evropského na Šumavĕ (The population growth of Eurasian beaver in the Bohemian Forest). SilvaGabreta 20, 25–40 (in Czech with English summary).Google Scholar
  44. Wilsson, L., 1971. Observations and experiments on the ethology of the European beaver (Castorfiber L): a study in the development of phylogenetically adapted behaviour in a highly specialized mammal. Viltrevy 8,117–261.Google Scholar
  45. Zahner, V., 1997. Der Biber in Bayern. Bayerischen Landesansalt fur Wald und Fortwirtschaft, Freising.Google Scholar
  46. Zurowski, W., Kasperczyk, B., 1988. Effects of reintroduction of European beaver in the lowlands of the Vistula basin. Acta Theriol. 33, 325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Zurowski, W., Kasperczyk, B., 1990. Results of beaver reintroduction in some Carpathian mountain streams. Ochrona Przyrody 47, 201–214.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Deutsche Gesellschaft für Säugetierkunde 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Ecology, Faculty of Environmental ScienceCzech University of Life SciencesPrague 6Czech Republic

Personalised recommendations

Cite article

Buy options