Mammalian Biology

, Volume 80, Issue 5, pp 373–379 | Cite as

Comparison of microhabitat selection and trace abundance of giant pandas between primary and secondary forests in Liziping Nature Reserve, China: effects of selective logging

  • Mingsheng Hong
  • Shibin Yuan
  • Zhisong Yang
  • Xuyu Yang
  • Xiaodong Gu
  • Feng Huang
  • Zejun ZhangEmail author
Original Investigation


The giant panda is an iconic forest-dwelling conservation species worldwide. Preservation of forests is considered essential to keep their populations sustainable in the wild. However, little effort has been made to uncover effects of selective logging on their abundance and habitat selection. In this research, we conducted a field survey during May-November 2012 in Liziping National Nature Reserve, China, to compare trace abundance and microhabitat selection by giant pandas in primary and secondary forests. Our results indicated that forest structure varied significantly in selectively logged forests, especially for tree and bamboo layers. Slope and bamboos are significant variables affecting microhabitat utilization by giant pandas in the two forest types. Significant difference was found in rations of elevations, total trees, total shrubs, total dead bamboos and basal diameter of biennial bamboos between primary and secondary forests, indicating selective logging had an effect on microhabitat selection by giant pandas in the study area. In addition, trace abundance, as indexed by droppings and dropping groups per km, decreased significantly in secondary forests. Selective logging can not only affect the inner structure of forests in giant panda habitats, but also their spatial distribution and microhabitat selection behaviors. The flexibility in microhabitat selection of giant pandas can help them to adapt to surrounding conditions. In the future, conservation attention should be paid to the effects of forest types on habitat selection of captive released giant pandas, and gentle areas in habitats when patrolling and monitoring.


Giant panda Microhabitat selection Trace abundance Forest type Selective logging 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bearer, S., Linderman, M., Huang, J.Y., Li, A., He, G.M., Liu, J.G., 2008. Effects of fuel-wood collection and timber harvesting on giant panda habitat use. Biol. Conserv. 141, 385–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Fabrizio, S., Pedrini, P., Marchesi, L, 2003. Adaptive selection of foraging and nesting habitats by black kites (Milvus migrants) and its implications for conservation: a multi-scale approach. Biol. Conserv. 112, 351–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Fisher, J.T., Wilkinson, L., 2005. The response of mammals to forest fire and timber harvest in the North American boreal forest. Mammal Soc. 35, 51–81.Google Scholar
  4. Food and Agriculture Organization, 2001. Forests Out of Bounds: Impacts and Effectiveness of Logging Bans in Natural Forests in Asia-Pacific. Asia-Pacific Forestry Commission, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.Google Scholar
  5. Hu, J.C., 2001. Research on the Giant Panda. Shanghai Technology and Education Press, Shanghai, China (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  6. Hu, J.C., Schaller, G.B., 1985. The Giant Pandas of Wolong. Sichuan Science and Technology Press, Chengdu, China (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  7. Hull, V., Roloff, G., Zhang, J.D., Liu, W., Zhou, S.Q., Huang, J.Y., Xu, W.H., Ouyang, Z.Y., Zhang, H.M., Liu, J.G., 2014. A synthesis of giant panda habitat selection. Ursus 25 (2), 148–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Jenkins, M., 2003. Prospects for biodiversity. Science 302, 1175–1177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Liang, Q.W., Thomson, A.J., 1994. Habitat-abundance relationships of the earthworm Eisenia rosea (Savigny) (Lumbricidae), using principle component regression analysis. Can. J. Zool. 72, 1354–1361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Liu, J.G., Linderman, M., Ouyang, Z.Y., An, L., Yang, J., Zhang, H., 2001. Ecological degradation in protected areas: the case of Wolong Nature Reserve for giant pandas. Science 292, 98–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Mattson, D.J., 1997. Use of lodgepole pine covertypes by Yellowstone grizzly bears. J. Wildl. Manage. 61, 480–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. McLellan, B.N., Shackleton, D.M., 1989. Grizzly bears and resource-extraction industries - habitat displacement in response to seismic exploration, timber harvesting and road maintenance.J. Appl. Ecol. 26, 371–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Pimm, S.L., Raven, P., 2000. Biodiversity: extinction by numbers. Nature 403, 843–845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ouyang, Z.Y., Li, Z.X., Liu, J.G., An, L., Zhang, H.M., Tan, Y.C., 2002. Recovery process of giant panda habitat in Wolong Nature Reserve, Sichuan, China. Acta Ecol. Sinica 22 (11), 1840–1849 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  15. Ran, J.H., Zeng, Z.Y., Wang, H., Liu, S.Y., Wang, H.J., Liu., S.C., 2004. A comparative study on habitat preference of giant pandas in primary and secondary forests. J. Beijing Forestry Univ. 26, 8–14 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  16. Reid, D.G., Hu, J.C, 1991a. Giant panda selection between bamboo Bashania fangiana habitats in Wolong Reserve. J. Appl. Ecol. 28, 228–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Reid, D.G., Alan, H., Hu, J.C., Qin, Z.S., 1991b. Environmental influences on bamboo BasnaniaFangiana growth and implications forgiant panda conservation. J. Appl. Ecol. 28, 855–868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Schaller, G.B., Hu, J.C., Pan, W.S., Zhu, J., 1985. The Giant Pandas of Wolong. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, USA.Google Scholar
  19. Sèbastien, S., Perrin, N., Neet, C, 2003. Winter habitat selection by two sympatric forest grouse in Western Switzerland: implications for conservation. Biol. Conserv. 112, 373–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Shen, G.Z., Feng, C.Y., Xie, Z.Q., Ouyang, Z.Y., Li, J.Q., Pascal, M., 2008. Proposed conservation landscape forgiant pandas in the Minshan Mountains, China. Conserv. Biol. 22, 1144–1153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Shimian County Forestry Compiling Committee, 2004. Forestry biography of Shimian County. Sichuan Cichu Press, Chengdu, China (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  22. State Forestry Administration, 2006. The Third National Survey Report on Giant Panda in China. Science Press, Beijing (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  23. Swaisgood, R.R., Wei, F.W., Wild, D.E., Kouba, A.J., Zhang, Z.J., 2010. Giant panda conserve on science: how far we have come. Biol. Lett. 6, 143–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Waller, J.S., Mace, R.D., 1997. Grizzly bear habitat selection in the Swan Mountains, Montana. J. Wildl. Manage. 61, 1032–1039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wei, F.W., Feng, Z.J., Wang, Z.W., Hu, J.C, 2000. Habitat use and separation between the giant panda and the red panda. J. Mammal. 81 (2), 448–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Zhang, Z.J., Wei, F.W., Li, M., Zhang, B.W., Liu, X.H., Hu, J.C, 2004. Microhabitat separation during winter among sympatric giant pandas, red pandas and tufted deer: the effects of diet, body size, and energy metabolism. Can. J. Zool. 82, 1451–1458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Zhang, Z.J., Wei, F.W., Li, M., Hu, J.C, 2006. Winter microhabitat separation between giant and red pandas in Bashania faberi bamboo forest in Fengtongzhai Nature Reserve. J. Wildl. Manage. 70 (1), 231–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Zhang, Z.J., Swaisgood, R.R., Wu, H., Zhang, Z., Li, M., Yong, Y., Hu, J.C, Wei, F.W., 2007. Factors predicting den use by maternal giant pandas. J. Wildl. Manage. 71, 2694–2698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Zhang, Z.J., Zhan, X.J., Li, Y., Li, M., Hu, J.C, Wei, F.W., 2009. What determines selection and abandonment of a foraging patch by wild giant pandas (Ailuropoda melanoleuca) in winter? Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 16, 79–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Zhang, Z.J., Swaisgood, R.R., Zhang, S.N., Nordstrom, L.A., Wang, H.J., Gu, X.D., Hu, J.C, Wei, H.W., 2011. Old-growth forest is what giant pandas really need. Biol. Lett. 7, 403–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Zhou, H., Yuan, S.B., Yang, Z.S., Zheng, L.S., Yang, Y., Gu, X.D., Yang, X.Y., Zhang, Z.J., 2014. Correlation between diet and biomass of staple-food bamboos utilized by giant pandas during summer in Liziping Nature Reserve, China. Acta Theriol. Sinica 34 (1), 352–360 (in Chinese).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Deutsche Gesellschaft für Säugetierkunde 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mingsheng Hong
    • 1
    • 4
  • Shibin Yuan
    • 1
  • Zhisong Yang
    • 1
  • Xuyu Yang
    • 2
  • Xiaodong Gu
    • 2
  • Feng Huang
    • 3
  • Zejun Zhang
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Southwest China Wildlife Resources Conservation, Ministry of EducationNanchongChina
  2. 2.Wildlife Conservation DivisionSichuan Forestry BureauChengduChina
  3. 3.Liziping National Nature Reserve Administration BureauShimianChina
  4. 4.Genetic Engineering Research CenterSchool of Life Science, Chongqing UniversityChongqingChina

Personalised recommendations