Mammalian Biology

, Volume 79, Issue 1, pp 58–63 | Cite as

A foe in woe: American mink (Neovison vison) diet changes during a population decrease

  • Rannveig MagnusdottirEmail author
  • Menja von Schmalensee
  • Robert A. Stefansson
  • David W. Macdonald
  • Pall Hersteinsson
Original Investigation


The invasive American mink has been a component of Iceland’s fauna since the 1930s. Hunting statistics indicate that until 2003 the population size was increasing, but thereafter decreased rapidly. The Icelandic marine environment has experienced various changes in recent years, including rising sea temperature and sand-eel collapse followed by seabird recruitment failure and population declines. Furthermore the arctic fox population has increased at least six-fold in the last three decades. Mink stomach content analysis in the period 2001–2009 revealed diet changes, and signs of reduced prey availability for this generalist predator, that were most significant in males. The most marked shift in composition was a decrease in consumption of birds. Our findings suggest that climate events, together with competition with increasing numbers of arctic foxes over terrestrial food, contributed to the sharp reduction in the mink population from 2004 and onwards. Despite their generalist behaviour, mink have apparently failed to respond fully to these environmental changes, and this susceptibility may benefit attempts to control their numbers. The results are relevant to the ability of top predators in general to cope with diverse ecosystem alterations triggered by climate change.


Mustela vison Invasive Generalist Climate change Carnivore conservation 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Arnott, SA, Ruxton, G.D., 2002. Sandeel recruitment in the North Sea: demographic, climatic and trophic effects. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 238, 199–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Asbirk, S., Berg, L, Hardeng, G., Koskimies, P., Petersen, A., 1997. Population sizes and trends of birds in the Nordic countries 1978–1994. In: Nordic Council of Ministers, Copenhagen, TemaNord 614.Google Scholar
  3. Bogason, V., Lilliendahl, K., 2009. An initiation of sandeel monitoring in Iceland. In: Environmental Conditions in Icelandic Waters 2008. Reports of the Marine Research Institute, Reykjavík, pp. 145.Google Scholar
  4. Carlsson, N.O.L., Jeschke, J.M., Holmqvist, N., Kindberg, J., 2010. Long-term data on invaders: when the fox is away, the mink will play. Biol. Invasions 12, 633–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. DAISIE, 2011. Delivering Alien Invasive Species Inventories for Europe, 100 of the worst.
  6. Dunstone, N., 1993. Food and Foraging, the Mink. T. & A.D. Poyser Ltd., London, pp. 62–99.Google Scholar
  7. Elliott, J., 1994. Quantitative Ecology and the Brown Trout. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  8. Gardarsson, A., 2006. Recent changes in Icelandic cliff birds (In Icelandic). Bliki 27, 13–22.Google Scholar
  9. Gardarsson, A., 2009. Numbers of common eider, long-tailed duck, red-breasted merganser and mallard, wintering on the coast of Iceland. (In Icelandic with an English summary). Bliki 30, 49–54.Google Scholar
  10. Gerell, R., 1968. Food habits of the mink (Mustela vison) in Sweden. Viltrevy (Stock-holm) 5, 119–211.Google Scholar
  11. Hatun, H., Payne, M.R., Beaugrand, G., Reid, P.C., Sando, A.B., Drange, H., Hansen, B., Jacobsen, J.A., Bloch, D., 2009. Large bio-geographical shifts in the north-eastern Atlantic ocean: from the subpolar gyre, via plankton, to blue whiting and pilot whales. Prog. Oceanogr. 80, 149–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hersteinsson, P., 1984. The Behavioural Ecology of the Arctic Fox (Alopex lagopus) in Iceland. Oxford University, Oxford, PhD thesis.Google Scholar
  13. Hersteinsson, P., Macdonald, D.W., 1996. Diet of arctic foxes (Alopex lagopus) in Iceland. J. Zool. 240, 457–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hersteinsson, P., Yom-Tov,Y.,Geffen,E., 2009. Effect of sub-polar gyre, North Atlantic oscillation and ambient temperature on size and abundance in the Icelandic Arctic fox. Glob. Change Biol. 15, 1423–1433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hersteinsson, P., Stefansson, R.A., vonSchmalensee, M., 2012. A Pilot Programme on a Local Eradication of American Mink in Eyjafjordur and Snæfellsnes, Iceland, 2007–2009. Reykjavík: Final Report on the Program‘s Success and Proposals for the Future. Ministry for the Environment.Google Scholar
  16. Jonsson, J.E., Gardarsson, A., Gill, J.A., Petursdottir, U.K., Petersen, A., Gunnarsson,T.G., 2013. Relationships between long-term demography and weather in a sub-arctic population of common eider. PLOS One (in press).Google Scholar
  17. King, CM., Strachan, R., 2006. Introduced species and the line between biodiversity conservation and naturalistic eugenics. In: Macdonald, D.W. (Ed.), Key Topics in Conservation Biology. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, pp. 85–104.Google Scholar
  18. Lindstrom, E.R., Brainerd, S.M., Helldin, J.O., Overskaug, K., 1995. Pine marten red fox interactions – a case of intraguild predation. Ann. Zool. Fenn. 32, 123–130.Google Scholar
  19. Macdonald, D.W., Sillero-Zubiri, C. (Eds.), 2004. The Biology and Conservation of Wild Canids. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  20. Macdonald, D.W., Loveridge, A.J. (Eds.), 2009. The Biology and Conservation of Wild Felids. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  21. Macdonald, D.W., Sidorovich, V.E., Maran, T., Kruuk, H., 2002. European Mink, Mustela lutreola: Analysis for Conservation. Wildlife Conservation Research Unit and the Environmental Agency, Oxford.Google Scholar
  22. Magnusdottir, R., Stefánsson, R.A., von Schmalensee, M., Macdonald, D.W., Hersteinsson, P., 2012. Habitat- and sex-related differences in a small carnivore’s diet in a competitor-free environment. Eur. J. Wildl. Res. 58, 669–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nentwig, W., Kuhnel, E., Bacher, S., 2010. A generic impact-scoring system applied to alien mammals in Europe. Conserv. Biol. 24, 302–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ottersen, G., Planque, B., Belgrano, A., Post, E., Reid, P.C., Stenseth, N.C., 2001. Ecological effects of the North Atlantic oscillation. Oecologia 128, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Root, T.L., Liverman, D., Newman, C, 2006. Managing biodiversity in the light of climate change: current biological effects and future impacts. In: Macdonald, D.W. (Ed.), Key Topics in Conservation Biology. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, pp. 85–104.Google Scholar
  26. Simberloff, D., 2003. How much information on population biology is needed to manage introduced species? Conserv. Biol. 17, 83–92.Google Scholar
  27. Skirnisson, K., 1979. Food habits of mink (Mustela vison Schreber) in Grindavík, south west Iceland. (In Icelandic with an English summary). Náttúrufræ[??]ingurinn 49, 194–203 (In Icelandic with English summary).Google Scholar
  28. Skirnisson, K., Petersen, A., 1980. Minkur (in Icelandic). In: Einarsson, A. (Ed.), Villt Spendyr, vol. 7. Icelandic Environment Association, Reykjavík, pp. 80–94.Google Scholar
  29. Stenseth, N.C., Mysterud, A., 2002. Climate, changing phenology, and other life history and traits: nonlinearity and match-mismatch to the environment. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99, 13379–13381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Stenseth, N.C., Mysterud, A., Ottersen, G., Hurrell, J.W., Chan, K.S., Lima, M., 2002. Ecological effects of climate fluctuations. Science 297, 1292–1296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Thrainsson, S., Baldursson, S., Gardarsson, A., Gudmundsson, G.A., Johannesdottir, G.H., Marinosdottir, S., von Schmalensee, M., 2011. Protection and Restoration of Auk Populations (in Icelandic). The Icelandic Ministry for the Environment, Reykjavík.Google Scholar
  32. Unnsteinsdottir, E.R., Hersteinsson, P., 2009. Surviving north of the natural range: the importance of density independence in determining population size. J. Zool. 277, 232–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. von Schmalensee, M., 2010. Ecosystems in peril, part two: alien and invasive species in Iceland (in Icelandic with English summary). Natturufraedingurinn 80, 84–102.Google Scholar
  34. Walther, G.R., Post, E., Convey, P., Menzel, A., Parmesan, C, Beebee, T.J.C., Fromentin, J.M., Hoegh-Guldberg, O., Bairlein, F., 2002. Ecological responses to recent climate change. Nature 416, 389–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Yamaguchi, N., Gazzard, D., Scholey, G., Macdonald, D.W., 2003. Concentrations and hazard assessment of PCBs, organochlorine pesticides and mercury in fish species from the upper Thames: river pollution and its potential effects on top predators. Chemosphere 50, 265–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Deutsche Gesellschaft für Säugetierkunde 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rannveig Magnusdottir
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    Email author
  • Menja von Schmalensee
    • 1
    • 2
  • Robert A. Stefansson
    • 1
    • 2
  • David W. Macdonald
    • 3
  • Pall Hersteinsson
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Life and Environmental SciencesUniversity of IcelandReykjavikIceland
  2. 2.West-Iceland Centre of Natural HistoryStykkisholmurIceland
  3. 3.Wildlife Conservation Research Unit, Zoology DepartmentUniversity of Oxford, The Recanati-Kaplan Centre, Tubney HouseTubney, OxfordUK

Personalised recommendations