Mammalian Biology

, Volume 77, Issue 5, pp 358–362 | Cite as

Differential patterns of home-range, net displacement and resting sites use of Conepatus chinga in southern Brazil

  • Carlos B. KasperEmail author
  • José B. G. Soares
  • Thales R. O. Freitas
Original Investigation


Studies on the spatial ecology of Molina’s hog-nosed skunk were conducted in southern Brazil. Between April 2008 and April 2009, 18 individuals were tagged with radio collars and monitored by radiotelemetry (VHF). The average home-range estimated for 12 skunks was 1.63km2 ± 1.17km2. Males had home-ranges 2.5 times larger than females, and also showed significantly larger patterns of displacement. These differences in space probably were related not only to sexual size dimorphism, but also to differential behavior between sexes. We identified six basic types of resting sites, among which holes in the ground were the most common and comprised more than 50% of the total. Reuse of resting sites was high (32%), especially for females, which had a significantly higher rate than males. Although they showed a large proportion of home-range overlap even in the core areas, skunks exhibited a solitary life style, rarely sharing resting sites and maintaining relatively long distances from each other, equivalent to twice the distance of daily movements. The almost strictly nocturnal activity pattern observed in this study is a common characteristic of the family. Among practically all of the ecological features analyzed, males and females showed significant differences, denoting the importance of a sex-specific approach in ecological studies regarding this species.


Carnivora Mephitidae Neotropical region Spatial ecology Telemetry 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ayres, M., Ayres Jr., M., Ayres, D.L., Santos, A.A.S., 2007. BioEstat: Aplicações Estatís-ticas nas Áreas das Ciências Biomédicas. Belém, Brasil.Google Scholar
  2. Castillo, D.F., Lucherini, M., Vidal, E.M.L., Manfredi, C., Casanave, E.B., 2011a. Spatial organization of Molina’s hog nosed skunk (Conepatus chinga) in two landscapes of the Pampas grassland of Argentina. Can. J. Zool. 89, 229–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Castillo, D.F., Lucherini, M., Vidal, E.M.L., Casanave, E.B., 2011b. Denning ecology of Molina’s hog-nosed skunk in a farmland area in the Pampas grassland of Argentina. Ecol. Res. 26, 845–850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cheida, C.C., Nakano-Oliveira, E., Fusco-Costa, R., Rocha-Mendes, F., Quadros, J., 2006. Ordem Carnivora. In: Reis, N.R., Peracchi, A.L., Pedro, W.A., Lima, I.P. (Eds.), Mamíferos do Brasil. Londrina, Brasil, pp. 231–275.Google Scholar
  5. Crooks, K.R., 1994. Den-site selection inthe island spotted skunk of Santa Cruz Island, California. Southwest. Nat. 39, 354–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Crooks,K.R.,VanVauren, D.,1995. Resourceutilizationbytwo insularendemic mam-malian carnivores, the island fox and the island spotted skunk. Oecologia 104, 301–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Donadio, E., Di Martino, S., Aubone, M., Novaro, A.J., 2001. Activity patterns, home-range, and habitat selection of the common hog-nosed skunk, Conepatus chinga (Mammalia: Mustelidae), in northwestern Patagonia. Mammalia 65, 49–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Donadio, E., Di Martino, S., Aubone, M., Novaro, A.J., 2004. Feeding ecology of the Andean hog-nosed skunk (Conepatus chinga) in areas under different land use in northwestern Patagonia. J. Arid Environ. 56, 709–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Doty, J.B., Dowler, R.C., 2006. Denning ecology in sympatric populations of skunks (Spilogale gracilis and Mephitis mephitis) in west-central Texas. J. Mammal. 87, 131–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Endres, K.M., Smith, W.P., 1993. Influence of age, sex, season and availability on den selection by raccoons within the central basin of Tennessee. Am. Midl. Nat. 129, 116–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fuller, T.K., Johnson, W.E., William, L.F., Johnson, K.A., 1987. Notes on the Patago-nian hog-nosed skunk (Conepatus humboldti) in southern Chile. J. Mammal. 68, 864–867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gannon, W.L., Sikes, R.S., the Animal Care and Use Committee of the American Soci-ety of Mammalogists, 2007. Guidelines of the American Society of Mammalogists for the use of wild mammals in research. J. Mammal. 88, 809–823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gittleman, J.L., Harvey, P.H., 1982. Carnivore home-range size: metabolic needs and ecology. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 10, 57–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gompper, M.E., Gittleman, J.L., 1991. Home-range scaling: intraspecific and comparative patterns. Oecologia 87, 343–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hammer, Ø., Harper, D.A.T., Ryem, P.D., 2001. PAST: Paleontological Statistics Software Package for Educational and Data Analysis. Version 1.37 (accessed 23 February 2011) Scholar
  16. Hwang, Y.T., Larivière, S., 2001. Mephitis macraura. Mammal. Spec. 686, 1–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. IBGE, 1978. Mapa Brasil climas (accessed 10 May 2011) Scholar
  18. Kasper, C.B., Fontoura Rodrigues, M.L., Cavalcanti, G.N., Freitas, T.R.O., Rodrigues, F.H.G., Oliveira, T.G., Eizirik, E., 2009. Recent advances in the knowledge of Molina’s hog-nosed skunk Conepatus chinga and striped hog-nosed skunk C. semistriatus in South America. Small Carn. Cons. 41, 25–28.Google Scholar
  19. Kie, J.G., Bowyer, R.T., Boroski, B.B., Nicholson, M.C., Loft, E.R., 2002. Landscape heterogeneity at differing scales: effects on spatial distribution of mule deer. Ecology 83, 530–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Larivière, S., Messier, F., 1998. Denning ecology of the striped skunk in the Canadian prairies: implications for the waterfowl nest predation. J. Appl. Ecol. 35, 207–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lesmeister, D.B., Gompper, M.E., Millspaugh, J., 2008. Summer resting and den site selection by Eastern spotted skunks (Spilogale putorius) in Arkansas. J. Mammal. 89, 1512–1520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lesmeister, D.B., Gompper, M.E., Millspaugh, J., 2009. Habitat selection of eastern spotted skunk in the Ouachita Mountains, Arkansas, USA. J. Wildl. Manage. 73, 18–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Patton, R.F., 1974. Ecological and Behavioral Relationships of the Skunks of Trans Pecos, Texas. Ph.D. Dissertation. Texas A&M University, Texas, United States.Google Scholar
  24. Powell, R.A., 2000. Animal home-ranges and territories and home-range estimators. In: Boitani, L., Fuller, T.K. (Eds.), Research Techniques in Animal Ecology: Controversies and Consequences. Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 65–103.Google Scholar
  25. Redford, K.H., Eisenberg, J.F., 1992. Mammals of the Neotropics: The Southern Cone. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, United States.Google Scholar
  26. Reed, C.A., Carr, W.H., 1949. Use of cactus as protection by hooded skunk.J. Mammal. 30, 79–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Reppucci, J.I., Castillo, D.F., Lucherini, M., Vidal, E.M.L., Casanave, E.B., 2009. Interindi-vidual interactions of Molina’s hog-nosed skunks Conepatus chinga in the Pampas grassland of Argentina. Acta Theriol. 54, 87–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sandell, M., 1989. The mating tactics and spacing patterns of solitary carnivores. In: Gittleman, J.L. (Ed.), Carnivore Behavior, Ecology, and Evolution. Cornell University Press, New York, pp. 164–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Storm, G.L., 1972. Daytime retreats and movements of skunks on farmlands in Illinois. J. Wildl. Manage. 36, 31–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sunquist, M.E., Sunquist, F., Daneke, D.E., 1989. Ecological separation ina Venezuelan Llanos carnivore community. In: Redford, K.H., Eisemberg, J.F. (Eds.), Advances in Neotropical Mammalogy. Sandhill Crane Press, Gainesville, pp. 197–232.Google Scholar
  31. Travaini, A., Delibes, M., Ceballos, O., 1998. Summer foods of the Andean hog-nosed skunk (Conepatus chinga) in Patagonia. J. Zool. 246, 457–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. White, G.C., Garrot, R.A., 1990. Analysis of Wild-life Radio-tracking Data. Academic Press, San Diego.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Deutsche Gesellschaft für Säugetierkunde 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carlos B. Kasper
    • 1
    Email author
  • José B. G. Soares
    • 2
  • Thales R. O. Freitas
    • 3
  1. 1.Programa de Pós Graduação em Biologia AnimalUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)Porto AlegreBrazil
  2. 2.Instituto Pró PampaPelotasBrazil
  3. 3.Laboratório de Citogenética e Evolução, Departamento de GenéticaUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)Porto AlegreBrazil

Personalised recommendations