Mammalian Biology

, Volume 75, Issue 5, pp 399–411 | Cite as

Effect of felling on red fox (Vulpes vulpes) and pine marten (Martes martes) diets in transitional mixed forest in Belarus

  • Vadim E. SidorovichEmail author
  • Anna A. Sidorovich
  • Dmitry A. Krasko
Original Investigation


In transitional mixed forests in northern and central Belarus the influence of intensified felling on the diets of red foxes Vulpes vulpes L. and pine martens Martes martes L. was investigated in two model forested terrains with sandy and clay top-grounds. A total of 1904 scats of red foxes and 1624 scats of pine martens were analysed over two periods differed by logging rate. When logging rate was conservative, red fox and pine marten diets were found to be similar, but under heavy logging feeding of the predator species shifted. In both model woodlands we found the same pronounced dietary trend of higher consumption of rodents, first of all, Microtus voles. The dietary changes were well related to the registered increase in Microtus vole numbers and total number of rodents in felling areas. The increased preying on rodents caused lower consumption of other food items, particularly medium-sized mammals (year-round) or/and birds or/and fruits (in the warm season) or/and mammalian carrion (in the cold season). In the conditions of intensified felling the food niches of the red fox and pine marten diverged mostly because of the great difference in the species structure of rodents consumed. Red foxes turned to preying on Microtus voles more frequently, but less on bank voles Myodes glareolus; while pine martens increased their taking of Microtus voles, continued foraging for bank voles and began taking slightly more of Apodemus mice. Before heavy logging dietary similarity between the red fox and pine marten was high and did not vary considerably through seasons and study areas, whereas after felling was intensified their diet overlap became lower.


Vulpes vulpes Martes martes Feeding ecology Clearcut Belarus 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aksenova, T.G., Bulyuk, A.A., 1986. Species composition and distribution of small rodents and soricids in clearcuts in locality “Melky les”. Researches of Oak Woods in the Forest-Steppe Region. Nauka, Leningrad, pp. 117–124 (in Russian).Google Scholar
  2. Andren, H., Angelstam, P., Lindström, E., Widen, P., 1985. Differences in predation pressure in relation to habitat fragmentation: an experiment. Oikos 45, 273–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andren, H., Angelstam, P., 1988. Elevated predation rates as an edge effect in habitat islands: experimental evidence. Ecology 69, 544–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Angelstam, P., 1986. Predation on ground-nesting birds’ nests in relation to predator densities and habitat edge. Oikos 47, 365–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baltrūnaitė, L., 2001. Feeding habits, food niche overlap of red fox (Vulpes vulpes) and pine marten (Martes martes) in hilly moraine highland, Lithuania. Ecologija 2, 27–31.Google Scholar
  6. Bissonette, J.B., Fredrickson, R.J., Tucker, B.J., 1988. The effects of forest harvesting on marten and small mammals in western Newfoundland. Report, the New-foundland and Labrador Wildlife Division and Corner Brook Pulp and Paper, Ltd., Utah State University, Logan, UT, 109pp.Google Scholar
  7. Böhme, G., 1977. Zur Bestimmung quartärer Anuren Europas an Hand von Skelettelementen. Wissenschaftliche Zeitschrift der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin Reihe Mathematik, Naturwissenschaften 26, 283–300.Google Scholar
  8. Bryja, J., Heroldova, M., Zejda, J, 2002. Effect of deforestation on structure and diversity of small mammal communities in the Moravskoslezske Beskydy Mts (Czech Republic). Acta Theriologica 47, 295–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carey, A.B., Johnson, M.L., 1995. Small mammals in managed, naturally young, and old-growth forests. Ecological Applications 5, 336–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Debrot, S., Fivaz, G., Mermod, C., Weber, J.-M., 1982. Atlas des poils de mammiferes d’Europe. Ed. Inst. Zool. Univ., Neuchatel.Google Scholar
  11. Fahrig, L., Grez, A.A., 1996. Population spatial structure, human-caused landscape changes and species survival. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural 69, 5–13.Google Scholar
  12. Fedorov, N.I., Sarnackij, V.V., 2001. Peculiarities of spruce forest formation in relation to its periodic large-scale withering. Techologija, Minsk (in Russian).Google Scholar
  13. Fuller, A.K., Harrison, D.J., Lachowski, H.J., 2004. Stand scale effects of partial harvesting and clearcutting on small mammals and forest structure. Forest Ecology and Management 1991, 373–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hargis, C.D., 1982. Winter habitat utilization and food habits of pine marten in Yosemite National Park. Technical Report No. 6. Cooperative National Park Resources Studies Unit, University of California, Davis, CA, 59pp.Google Scholar
  15. Hansson, L., 1978. Small mammal abundance in relation to environmental variables in three Swedish forest phases. Studia Forestalia Suecica 147, 1–39.Google Scholar
  16. Hansson, L., 1994. Vertebrate distributions relative to clear-cut edges in a boreal forest landscape. Landscape Ecology 9, 105–115.Google Scholar
  17. Henttonen, H., 1989. Does an increase in the rodent and predator densities, resulting from modern forestry, contribute to the long-term decline in Finnish tetraonids?. Suomen Riista 35, 83–90.Google Scholar
  18. Jędrzejewski, W., Jędrzejewska, B., 1992. Foraging and diet of the red fox Vulpes vulpes in relation to variable food resources in Bialowieza National Park. Ecography 15, 212–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jedrzejewski, W., Zalewski, A., Jedrzejewska, B., 1993. Foraging by pine marten Martes martes in relation to food resources in Bialowieza National Park, Poland. Acta Theriologica 38, 405–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jędrzejewski, W., Jędrzejewska, B., 1993. Predation on rodents in Bialowieza primeval forest, Poland. Ecography 16, 47–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jędrzejewski, W., Jędrzejewska, B., 1996. Rodent cycles with relations to biomass and productivity of ground vegetation and predation in the Palearctic. Acta Theriologica 41, 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jędrzejewska, B., Jędrzejewski, W., 1998. Predation in vertebrate communities, The Białowieza Primeral Forest as a Case Study. Springer, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kirkland Jr., G.L., Johnston Jr., T.R., Steblein, P., 1985. Small mammal exploitation of a forest-clearcut interface. Acta Theriologica 30, 211–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Korpimäki, E., Norrdahl, K., 1989. Avian predation on mustelids in Europe 1: occurrence and effects on body size variation and life traits. Oikos 55, 205–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Krebs, C.J., 1998. In: Ecological Methodology. Addison-Welsey Educ. Publishers, California.Google Scholar
  26. Krebs, C.J., Boutin, S., Boonstra, R., 2001. Ecosystem Dynamics of the Boreal Forest. The Kluane Project. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  27. Kurki, S., Nikula, A., Helle, P., Linden, H., 1998. Abundance of red fox and pine marten in relation to the composition of boreal forest landscapes. Journal of Animal Ecology 67, 874–886.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kurki, S., Nikula, A., Helle, P., Linden, H., 2000. Landscape fragmentation and forest composition effects on grouse breeding success in boreal forests. Ecology 81 (7) 1985–1997.Google Scholar
  29. Lanszki, J., Kormendi, S., Hancz, C., Zalewski, A., 1999. Feeding habits and trophic niche overlap in a Carnivora community of Hungary. Acta Theriologica 44, 429–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Levins, R., 1968. In: Evolution in Changing Environments. Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
  31. Lindström, E.K., Brainerd, S.M., Helldin, J.O., Overskaug, K., 1995. Pine marten-red fox interactions: a case of intraguild predation?. Annales Zoologici Fennici 32, 123–130.Google Scholar
  32. März, R., 1987. In: Gewöll-und Rupfungskunde. Akademie Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
  33. Oehler, J.D., 1995. Multi-scaled responses of mammalian carnivores to forest fragmentation. M.S. Thesis, University of New Hampshire, Durham.Google Scholar
  34. Panzacchi, M., Herfindal, I., Linnell, J.D.C. et al., 2007. Predation risk, habitat use and distribution of alternative prey: the case of red fox, roe deer fawns, and small rodents. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Bolonga, Italy; University of Trondheim, Norway.Google Scholar
  35. Panzacchi, M., Linnell, J.D.C., Serrao, G., Eie, S., Odden, M., Odden, J., Andersen, R., 2007. Evaluation of the importance of roe deer fawns in the spring-summer diet of red foxes in southeastern Norway. Ecological Research, 3–10.Google Scholar
  36. Pulliainen, E., 1981. Winter habitat selection, home range, and movements of the pine marten (M. martes) in a Finnish Lapland forest. In: Proceedings of the Worldwide Furbearer Conference, pp. 1068–1087.Google Scholar
  37. Pulliainen, E., Ollinmäki, P., 1996. A long-term study of the winter food niche of the pine marten Martes martes in northern boreal Finland. Acta Theriologica 41, 337–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Reynolds, J.C., Aebisher, N.J., 1991. Comparison and quantification of carnivore diet by faecal analysis: a critique, with recommendations, based on a study of the Fox Vulpes vulpes. Mammal Review 3 (21), 97–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Shamovich, I.U., 2004. Seasonal dynamics of pine marten (Martes martes) diet in the conditions of homogeneous coniferous woodland of Central Belarus. Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, Biological Series 1, 105–112.Google Scholar
  40. Sidorovich, V.E., Solovej, I.A., Pikulik, M.M., Lauzhel, G.O., 2003. Landscape and habitat related differences in the structure of community of small mammal and their consumers in transitional forest of northern Belarus. Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, Biological Series 3, 84–98.Google Scholar
  41. Sidorovich, V.E., Krasko, D.A., Dyman, A.A., 2005. Landscape-related differences in diet, food supply and distribution pattern of the pine marten, Martes martes in the transitional mixed forest of northern Belarus. Folia Zoologica 54, 39–52.Google Scholar
  42. Sidorovich, V.E., Sidorovich, A.A., Izotova, I.A., 2006. Variations in the diet and population density of the red fox Vulpes vulpes in the mixed wood-lands of northern Belarus. Mammalian Biology 71, 74–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sidorovich, V., Krasko, D., Sidorovich, A., Solovej, I., Dyman, A., 2006. The pine marten’s Martes martes ecological niche and its relationships with other vertebrate predators in the transitional mixed forest ecosystems of northern Belarus. In: Santos-Reis, M., Brics, J, O’Doherty, E., Proulux, G. (Eds.), Martes in Carnivore Communities. Alpha Wildlife Publications, Alberta, pp. 107–124.Google Scholar
  44. Sidorovich, V.E., Solovej, I.A., Sidorovich, A.A., Rotenko, I.I., 2008. Effect of felling on the distribution of rodents and their predators in a transitional mixed forest. Polish Journal of Ecology 56 (2), 309–321.Google Scholar
  45. Sidorovich, V.E., Polozov, A.G., Solovej, I.A., 2008. Niche separation between the weasel Mustela nivalis and the stoat Mustela erminea in Belarus. Wildlife Biology 14 (2), 199–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sidorovich, V.E., Sidorovich, A.A., Ivanovskij, V.V, Pikulik, M.M., Shinkevich, E.P., 2008. The structure of vertebrate predator community in north-eastern Belarus before and after naturalization of the American mink and raccoon dog. Folia Zoologica 57, 373–391.Google Scholar
  47. Snyder, J.E., Bissonette, J.A., 1987. Marten use of clear-cuts and residual forest stands in western Newfoundland. Canadian Journal of Zoology 65, 169–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sokal, R.R., Rolf, F.J., 1995. In: Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research. W.H. Freeman and company, New York.Google Scholar
  49. Solovej, I.A., Sidorovich, V.E., Pikulik, M.M., Marcinkevich, G.I., 2001. Estimation of the landscape structure of Poozerie with implication on ecological carrying capacity of the habitats for vertebrate animals. Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, Biological Series 4, 89–96.Google Scholar
  50. Solovej, I.A., Sidorovich, V.E., Adamovich, S.G., Tihomirova, L.L., 2003. Habitat and landscape-related differences in carrying capacity in transitional woodlands for community of small mammals and their predators. Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, Biological Series 2, 92–99.Google Scholar
  51. Steventon, J.D., Major, J.T., 1982. Marten use of a commercially clearcut forest. Journal of Wildlife Management 46, 175–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Teerink, B.J., 1991. In: Hair of West-European Mammals. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  53. Thompson, I.D., 1986. Diet choice, hunting behavior, activity patterns, and ecological energetics of marten in natural and logged areas. Ph.D. Diss., Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, 176pp.Google Scholar
  54. Virgos, E., Telleria, J.L., Santos, T., 2002. A comparison on the response to forest fragmentation by medium-sized Iberian carnivores in central Spain. Biodiversity and Conservation 11, 1063–1079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wegge, P., Kastdalen, L., 2007. Pattern and causes of natural mortality of capercaillie, Tetrao urogallus, chicks in a fragmented boreal forest. Annales Zoologici Fennici 44, 141–151.Google Scholar
  56. Wołk, E., Wołk, K., 1982. Responses of small mammals to the forest management in the Bialowieza Primeval forest. Acta Theriologica 27, 45–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Zalewski, A., Jedrzejewski, W., Jedrzejewska, B., 1995. Pine marten home ranges, numbers and predation on vertebrates in a deciduous forest (Bialystok National Park, Poland). Annales Zoologici Fennici 32, 131–144.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Deutsche Gesellschaft für Säugetierkunde 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vadim E. Sidorovich
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Anna A. Sidorovich
    • 1
    • 2
  • Dmitry A. Krasko
    • 1
  1. 1.The Vertebrate Predation Research GroupThe Institute of Zoology of the National Academy of Sciences of BelarusMinskBelarus
  2. 2.The Department of Zoology, The Faculty of Biological SciencesThe Belarusian State UniversityMinskBelarus

Personalised recommendations