Advertisement

Mammalian Biology

, Volume 71, Issue 5, pp 304–308 | Cite as

Variation in the food-niche width of Gracilinanus microtarsus (Didelphimorphia: Didelphidae) in a cerrado remnant in south-eastern Brazil

  • E. G. Martins
  • V. Bonato
  • A. Pinheiro
  • S. F. dos ReisEmail author
Short communication

Key words

gracile mouse opossum feeding ecology intrapopulation variation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Batalha, M. A.; Martins, F. R. (2004): Reproductive phenology of the cerrado plant community in Emas National Park (central Brazil). Aust. J. Bot. 52, 149–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Colwell, R. K.; Futuyma, D. J. (1971): On the measurement of niche breadth and overlap. Ecology 52, 567–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Costa, L. P.; Leite, Y. L. R.; Patton, J. L. (2003): Phylogeography and systematic notes on two species of gracile mouse opossums, genus Gracilinanus (Marsupialia: Didelphidae) from Brazil. P. Biol. Soc. Washington 116, 275–292.Google Scholar
  4. Davison, A. C.; Hinkley, D. V. (1997): Bootstrap Methods and their Application. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Efron, B.; Tibshirani, R. J. (1993): An Introduction to Bootstrap. New York: Chapman & Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Eisenberg, J. F.; Redford, K. H. (2000): Mammals of the Neotropics: The Central Neotropics. Vol. 3. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  7. Emmons, L. H.; Feer, F. (1997): Neotropical Rainforest Mammals: A Field Guide. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  8. Gargaglioni, L. H.; Batalhão, M. E.; Lapenta, M. J.; Carvalho, M. F.; Rossi, R. V.; Veruli, V. P. (1998): Mamíferos da Estação Ecológica de Jataí, Luiz Antônio, Säo Paulo. P. Avul. Zool. 40, 267–287.Google Scholar
  9. Gray, R. D. (1987): Faith and foraging: a critique of the ‘paradigm argument from design’. In: Foraging Behavior. Ed. by A. C. Kamil, J. R. Krebs and H. R. Pulliam. New York: Plenum Press. Pp. 59–140.Google Scholar
  10. Krebs, C. J. (1989): Ecological Methodology. New York: Harper Collins Publishers.Google Scholar
  11. Manly, B. F. J. (1985): The Statistics of Natural Selection. New York: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
  12. Martins, E. G.; Bonato, V. (2004): On the diet of Gracilinanus microtarsus (Marsupialia, Didelphidae) in an Atlantic Rainforest fragment in southeastern Brazil. Mamm. Biol. 69, 58–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Martins, E. G., Bonato, V., da-Silva, C. Q., dos Reis, S. F., (2006a): Seasonality in reproduction, age structure and density of the gracile mouse opossum Gracilinanus microtarsus (Marsupialia: Didelphidae) in a Brazilian cerrado. J. Trop. Ecol. (in press).Google Scholar
  14. Martins, E. G.; Bonato, V.; Pinheiro, H. P.; dos Reis, S. F. (2006b): Diet of the gracile mouse opossum (Gracilinanus microtarsus) (Didelphimorphia: Didelphidae) in a Brazilian cerrado: patterns of food consumption and intrapopulation variation. J. Zool. 269, 21–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Martins, E. G., Bonato, V., da-Silva, C. Q., dos Reis, S. F. (2006c): Partial semelparity in the Neotropical didelphid marsupial Gracilinanus microtarsus. J. Mammal. (in press).Google Scholar
  16. McNab, B. K. (1963): Bioenergetics and the determinants of home range size. Am. Nat. 97, 133–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Oliveira-Filho, A. T., Ratter, J. (2002): Vegetation physiognomies and woody flora of the cerrado biome. In: The Cerrados of Brazil: Ecology and Natural History of a Neotropical Savanna. Ed. by P. S. Oliveira and R. J. Marquis. New York: Columbia University Press. Pp. 91–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Perry, G.; Pianka, E. R. (1997): Animal foraging: past, present and future. Trends Ecol. Evol. 12, 360–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pinheiro, F.; Diniz, I. R.; Coelho, D.; Bandeira, M. P. S. (2002): Seasonal pattern of insect abundance in the Brazilian cerrado. Austral. Ecol. 27, 132–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Primavesi, O., Primavesi, A. C. P. A., Pedroso, A. F., Camargo, A. C, Rassini, J. B., Rocha-Filho, J., Oliveira, G. P., Correa, L. A., Armelin, M. J.A., Vieira, S. R., Dechen, S. C. F. (1999): Microbacia Hidrográfica do Ribeiräo Canchim: Um Modelo Real de Laboratório Ambiental. Säo Carlos: Embrapa Pecuária Sudeste.Google Scholar
  21. Schoener, T. W. (1969): Sizes of feeding territories among birds. Ecology 49, 123–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Schoener, T. W. (1971): Theory of feeding strategies. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 2, 369–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Shine, R. (1989): Ecological causes for the evolution of sexual dimorphism: a review of the evidence. Q. Rev. Biol. 64, 419–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Silva, J. M. C.; Bates, J. M. (2002): Biogeographic patterns and conservation in the South American Cerrado: a tropical savanna hotspot. BioScience 52, 225–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Stephens, D. W.; Krebs, J. R. (1986): Foraging Theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Tolentino, M. (1967): Estudo Critico sobre o Clima da Regiäo de Säo Carlos. Säo Carlos: Pre-feitura Municipal de Säo Carlos.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Deutsche Gesellschaft für Säugetierkunde 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. G. Martins
    • 1
  • V. Bonato
    • 3
  • A. Pinheiro
    • 2
  • S. F. dos Reis
    • 4
    Email author
  1. 1.Programa de Pós-graduação em EcologiaUniversidade Estadual de CampinasCampinasBrazil
  2. 2.Departamento de Estatística, Instituto de Matemática, Estatística e Computação CientíficaUniversidade Estadual de CampinasCampinasBrazil
  3. 3.Instituto de Ciências BiológicasCentro Regional Universitário Espírito Santo do PinhalEspírito Santo do PinhalBrazil
  4. 4.Departamento de Parasitologia, Instituto de BiologiaUniversidade Estadual de CampinasCampinasBrazil

Personalised recommendations