Journal of Bionic Engineering

, Volume 5, Issue 4, pp 328–334 | Cite as

Segmental Kinematic Coupling of the Human Spinal Column during Locomotion

  • Guo-ru Zhao
  • Lei Ren
  • Lu-quan RenEmail author
  • John R. Hutchinson
  • Li-mei Tian
  • Jian S. Dai


As one of the most important daily motor activities, human locomotion has been investigated intensively in recent decades. The locomotor functions and mechanics of human lower limbs have become relatively well understood. However, so far our understanding of the motions and functional contributions of the human spine during locomotion is still very poor and simultaneous in-vivo limb and spinal column motion data are scarce. The objective of this study is to investigate the delicate in-vivo kinematic coupling between different functional regions of the human spinal column during locomotion as a stepping stone to explore the locomotor function of the human spine complex. A novel infrared reflective marker cluster system was constructed using stereophotogrammetry techniques to record the 3D in-vivo geometric shape of the spinal column and the segmental position and orientation of each functional spinal region simultaneously. Gait measurements of normal walking were conducted. The preliminary results show that the spinal column shape changes periodically in the frontal plane during locomotion. The segmental motions of different spinal functional regions appear to be strongly coupled, indicating some synergistic strategy may be employed by the human spinal column to facilitate locomotion. In contrast to traditional medical imaging-based methods, the proposed technique can be used to investigate the dynamic characteristics of the spinal column, hence providing more insight into the functional biomechanics of the human spine.


biomechanics spinal column human locomotion in-vivo segmental kinematics motion analysis stereophotogrammetry kinematic coupling 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    Stokes V P, Andersson C, Forssberg H. Rotational and translational movement features of the pelvis and thorax during adult human locomotion. Journal of Biomechanics, 1989, 22, 43–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Scholten P J M, Veldhuizen A G. The influence of spine geometry on the coupling between lateral bending and axial rotation. Proceedings of the IMechE Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine, 1985, 14, 167–171.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Konz R J, Fatone S, Stine R L, Ganju A, Gard S A, Ondra S L. A kinematic model to assess spinal motion during walking. Spine, 2006, 31, E898–E906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Drerup B, Ellger B, Meyer zu Bentrup F M, Hierholzer E. Functional rasterstereographic images. A new method for biomechanical analysis of skeletal geometry. Orthopade, 2001, 30, 242–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Adams M A, Burton K, Dolan P, Bogduk N. The Biomechanics of Back Pain, 1st ed., Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, 2002.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Littlewood C, May S. Measurement of range of movement in the lumbar spine-what methods are valid? A systematic review. Physiotherapy, 2007, 93, 201–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Pearcy M, Portek I, Shepherd J. The effect of low-back pain on lumbar spinal movements measured by three-dimensional X-ray analysis. Spine, 1985, 10, 150–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Takayanagi K, Takahashi K, Yamagata M, Moriya H, Kitahara H, Tamaki T. Using cineradiography for continuous dynamic-motion analysis of the lumbar spine. Spine, 2001, 26, 1858–1865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Syczewska M, Oberg T, Karlsson D. Segmental movements of the spine during treadmill walking with normal speed. Clinical Biomechanics, 1999, 14, 384–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Vogt L, Banzer W. Measurement of lumbar spine kinematics in incline treadmill walking. Gait and Posture, 1999, 9, 18–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Crosbie J, Vachalathiti R, Smith R. Patterns of spinal motion during walking. Gait and Posture, 1997, 5, 6–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Whittle M W, Levine D. Three-dimensional relationships between the movements of the pelvis and lumbar spine during normal gait. Human Movement Science, 1999, 18, 681–692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Ren L, Jones R K, Howard D. Whole body inverse dynamics over a complete gait cycle based only on measured kinematics. Journal of Biomechanics, 2008, 41, 2750–2759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Cappozzo A, Catani F, Croce U D, Leardini A. Position and orientation in space of bones during movement: Anatomical frame definition and determination. Clinical Biomechanics, 1995, 10, 171–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    Ren L, Jones R, Howard D. Generalized approach to three-dimensional marker-based motion analysis of biomechanical multi-segment systems. International Society of Biomechanics XXth Congress, Cleveland, Ohio, USA, 2005.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    Winter D, Sidwall H, Hobson D A. Measurement and reduction of noise in kinematics of locomotion. Journal of biomechanics, 1974, 7, 157–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    Mickelborough J, van der Linden M L, Richards J, Ennos A R. Validity and reliability of a kinematic protocol for determining foot contact events. Gait and Posture, 2000, 11, 32–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    Challis J H. A procedure for determining rigid body transformation parameters. Journal of Biomechanics, 1995, 28, 733–737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    Pearcy M, Tibrewal M. Axial rotation and lateral bending in the normal lumbar spine measured by three-dimensional radiography. Spine, 1984, 9, 582–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    Rowe P J, White M. Three-dimensional lumbar spinal kinematics during gait following mild musculo-skeletal low back pain in nurses. Gait and Posture, 1996, 4, 242–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    Crosbie J, Vachalathiti R, Smith R. Patterns of spinal motion during walking. Gait and Posture, 1997, 5, 6–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Jilin University 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Guo-ru Zhao
    • 1
  • Lei Ren
    • 2
  • Lu-quan Ren
    • 1
    Email author
  • John R. Hutchinson
    • 3
  • Li-mei Tian
    • 1
  • Jian S. Dai
    • 2
  1. 1.Key Laboratory for Terrain-Machine Bionics Engineering (Ministry of Education, China)Jilin UniversityChangchunP. R. China
  2. 2.School of Physical Science and Engineering, King’s College of LondonUniversity of LondonLondonUK
  3. 3.Structure and Motion Laboratory, Department of Veterinary Basic Sciences, The Royal Veterinary CollegeUniversity of LondonHertfordshireUK

Personalised recommendations