Advertisement

Journal of Bionic Engineering

, Volume 5, Supplement 1, pp 172–180 | Cite as

Identification of Stink Bugs Using an Electronic Nose

  • Yu-bin LanEmail author
  • Xian-zhe Zheng
  • John K. Westbrook
  • Juan Lopez
  • Ron Lacey
  • W. Clint Hoffmann
Article

Abstract

Stink bugs are recognized as pests of several economically important crops, including cotton, soybean and a variety of tree fruits. The Cyranose 320 was used for the classified investigation of stink bug. Stink bugs including males and females of the southern green stink bugs, Nezara viridula, were collected from crop fields around College Station, TX. Results show that the released chemicals and chemical intensity are both critical factors, which determine the rate that the Cyranose 320 correctly identified the stink bugs. The Cyranose 320 shows significant potential in identifying stink bugs, and can classify stink bug samples by species and gender.

Keywords

electronic nose detection stink bugs gender species 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    McPherson J E, McPherson R M. Stink Bugs of Economic Importance in America North of Mexico, CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Magan N, Evans P. Volatiles as an indicator of fungal activity and differentiation between species, and the potential use of electronic nose technology for early detection of grain spoilage. Journal of Stored Products Research, 2000, 36, 319–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Börjesson T, Eklöv T, Jonsson A, Sundgren H, Schnürer J. Electronic nose for odor classification of grains. Cereal Chemistry, 1996, 73, 457–461.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Zhang H, Wang J. Detection of age and insect damage incurred by wheat, with an electronic nose. Journal of Stored Products Research, 2007, 43, 489–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Rains C G, Tomberlin J K, Kulasiri D. Using insect sniffing devices for detection. Trends in Biotechnology, 2008, 26, 288–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Henderson W, Khalilian A, Han Y. Detecting stink bugs/damage in cotton utilizing a portable electronic nose. 2006 ASABE Annual International Meeting, Oregon Convention Center, Portland, Oregon, 2006.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Rains G C, Tomberlin J K, Alessandro M. D, Lewis W J. Limits of volatile chemical detection of a parasitoid wasp, Microplitis croceipes and an electronic nose: A comparative study. Transactions of the ASAE, 2004, 47, 2145–2152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Olsson J, Börjesson T, Lundstedt T, Schnürer J. Detection and quantification of ochratoxin A and deoxynivalenol in barley grains by GC-MS and electronic nose. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 2002, 72, 203–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Ahlstrom U, Borjesson E. Segregation of motion structure from random visual noise. Perception, 1996, 25, 279–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Patrycja C, Wojciech W. The analysis of sensor array data with various pattern recognition techniques. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 2006, 114, 85–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Jilin University 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yu-bin Lan
    • 1
    Email author
  • Xian-zhe Zheng
    • 2
  • John K. Westbrook
    • 1
  • Juan Lopez
    • 1
  • Ron Lacey
    • 3
  • W. Clint Hoffmann
    • 1
  1. 1.USDA-ARSCollege StationUSA
  2. 2.College of EngineeringNortheast Agricultural UniversityHarbinP. R. China
  3. 3.Department of Biological and Agricultural EngineeringTexas A&M UniversityCollege StationUSA

Personalised recommendations