Advertisement

Journal of Bionic Engineering

, Volume 5, Issue 3, pp 189–196 | Cite as

Multi-Scale Compliant Foot Designs and Fabrication for Use with a Spider-Inspired Climbing Robot

  • Dan Sameoto
  • Yasong Li
  • Carlo MenonEmail author
Article

Abstract

Climbing robots are of potential use for surveillance, inspection and exploration in different environments. In particular, the use of climbing robots for space exploration can allow scientists to explore environments too challenging for traditional wheeled designs. To adhere to surfaces, biomimetic dry adhesives based on gecko feet have been proposed. These biomimetic dry adhesives work by using multi-scale compliant mechanisms to make intimate contact with different surfaces and adhere by using Van der Waals forces. Fabrication of these adhesives has frequently been challenging however, due to the difficulty in combining macro, micro and nanoscale compliance. We present an all polymer foot design for use with a hexapod climbing robot and a fabrication method to improve reliability and yield. A high strength, low-modulus silicone, TC-5005, is used to form the foot base and microscale fibres in one piece by using a two part mold. A macroscale foot design is produced using a 3D printer to produce a base mold, while lithographic definition of microscale fibres in a thick photoresist forms the ‘hairs’ of the polymer foot. The adhesion of the silicone fibres by themselves or attached to the macro foot is examined to determine best strategies for placement and removal of feet to maximize adhesion. Results demonstrate the successful integration of micro and macro compliant feet for use in climbing on a variety of surfaces.

Keywords

biomimetics dry adhesive gecko climbing robot MEMS silicone 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Luk B L, Collie A A, Billingsley K. Robug II: An intelligent wall climbing robot. Proceedings of the 1991 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Sacramento, USA, 1991, 2342–2347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Grieco J C, Prieto M, Armada M, Gonzalez de Santos P. A six-legged climbing robot for high payloads. Proceedings of the 7th IEEE International Conference on Control Applications, Trieste, Italy, 1998, 446–450.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Autumn K, Sitti M, Liang Y A, Peattle A M, Hansen W R, Sponberg S, Kenny T W, Fearing R, Israelachvili J N, Full R H. Evidence for van der Waals adhesion in gecko setae. PNAS, 2002, 99, 12252–12256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Geim A K, Dubonos S V, Grigorieva I V, Novoselov K S, Zhukov A A, Shapoval S Y. Microfabricated adhesive mimicking gecko foot-hair. Nature Materials, 2003, 2, 461–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Glassmaker N J, Himeno T, Hui C Y, Kim J. Design of biomimetic fibrillar interfaces: 1. Making contact. Journal of Royal Society Interface, 2004, 1, 23–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Kim S, Sitti M. Biologically inspired polymer microfibres with spatulate tips as repeatable fibrillar adhesives. Applied Physics Letters, 2006, 89, 261911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Gorb S N, Sinha M, Peressadko A, Daltorio K A, Quinn R D. Insects did it first: A micropatterned adhesive tape for robotic applications. Bioinspiration and Biomimetics, 2007, 2, S117–S125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Daltorio K A, Gorb S, Peressadko A, Horchler A D, Ritzmann R E, Quinn R D. A robot that climbs walls using micro-structured polymer feet. Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Climbing and Walking Robots and the Support Technologies for Mobile Machines, London, UK, 2005, 131–138.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Aksak B, Murphy M P, Sitti M. Gecko inspired micro-fibrillar adhesives for wall climbing robots on micro/nanoscale rough surfaces. Proceedings of the 2008 International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Pasadena, USA, 2008, 3058–3063.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Kim S, Spenko M, Trujillo S, Heyneman B, Mattoli V, Cutkosky M R. Whole body adhesion: Hierarchical, directional and distributed control of adhesion forces for a climbing robot. Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE Conference on Robotics and Automation, Rome, Italy, 2007, 1268–1273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    BJB Enterprises. TC-5005 Silicone Data Sheet, [2008-07-07], http://www.bjbenterprises.com/pdf/TC-5005.pdf
  12. [12]
    BJB Enterprises. ST-1060 Polyurethane Data Sheet, [2008-07-07], http://www.bjbenterprises.com/pdf/ST-1060.pdf
  13. [13]
    Murphy M, Aksak B, Sitti M. Adhesion and anisotropic friction enhancements of angled heterogeneous micro-fiber arrays with spherical and spatula tips. Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology, 2007, 21, 1281–1296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    MicroChem Corporation. PMGI Data Sheet, [2008-07-08], http://www.microchem.com/products/pdf/PMGI-Resists-data-sheetV-rhcedit-102206.pdf
  15. [15]
    Shan J, Mei T, Ni L, Chen S, Chu J. Fabrication and adhesive force analysis of biomimetic gecko foot-hair array. Proceedings of the 1st IEEE International Conference on Nano/Micro Engineered and Molecular Systems, Zhuhai, China, 2006, 1546–1549.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    Gorb S, Varenberg M. Mushroom-shaped geometry of contract elements in biological adhesive systems. Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology, 2007, 21, 1175–1183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    del Campo A, Greiner C, Arzt E. Contact shape controls adhesion of bioinspired fibrillar surfaces. Langmuir, 2007, 23, 10235–10243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Jilin University 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.MENRVA Group, School of Engineering ScienceSimon Fraser UniversityBurnabyCanada

Personalised recommendations