Influence of solution treatment on microstructure of AEREX350 alloy

  • Wen-juan WanEmail author
  • Guang-wei Han
  • Bo Deng


The microstructure of hot rolled AEREX350 alloy under various solution treatments was investigated by scanning electron microscope (SEM) and transmission electron microscope (TEM). It was found that with increasing solution temperature, η phase precipitated firstly at grain boundaries in parallel at 800 °C and then within grains at about 980 °C. The η phase precipitated at grain boundaries played a role in preventing the migration of grain boundaries, and the η phase precipitated within grains would form Widmannstätten structure with further increasing solution temperature η phase precipitated at grain boundaries was dissolved at temperature ranging from 1080 °C to 1095 °C, resulting in grain growth promptly owing to release of the pinning effect on grain boundaries. γ′ phase precipitated during the process of air cooling after hot rolling and dissolved at temperature ranging between 1010 °C and 1 020 °C.

Key words

solution treatment microstructure precipitate AEREX350 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    SPS Technologies Aerospace Fasteners Group. Superalloys Developed by SPS Technologies for Aerospace Fasteners [R]. Jenkintown: SPS Technologies Inc, 1998.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Buzolits S. New High Temperature Alloy Characterized by Superior Alloy Properties at Temperatures to 1 350 °F [J]. Industrial Heating, 1994, 61(12): 34.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Buzolits S R, Kline L A. Bolting Alloy Fills High Temperature Gap [J]. Advanced Materials and Processes, 1995, 147(2): 33.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    ASM International. Nickel Alloy [J]. Alloy Digest, 1995(5): Ni-479.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Asgari S. Age-Hardening Behavior and Phase Identification in Solution-Treated AEREX350 Superalloy [J]. Metall Mater Trans, 2006, 37A(7): 2051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Tomasello C M, Pettit F S, Birks N, et al. Precipitation Behavior in AEREX350 [C] //Kissinger R D, Deye D J, Anton D L, et al. Superalloys 1996. Warrendale: TMS, 1996: 145.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Shibata T, Shudo Y, Takahashi T, et al. Effect of Stabilizing Treatment on Precipitation Behavior of Alloy 706 [C] //Kissinger R D, Deye D J, Anton D L, et al. Superalloys 1996. Warrendale: TMS, 1996: 627.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Danflou H L, Marty M, Walder A. Formation of Serrated Grain Boundaries and Their Effect on the Mechanical Properties in a P/M Nickel Base Superalloy [C] // Antolovich S D, Stusrud R W, Mackay R A, et al. Superalloys 1992. Warrendale: The Minerals, Metals and Materials Society, 1992: 63.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Samiee M, Asgari S. Influence of Solution Treatment on Precipitation Behavior of a Ni-Co Alloy [J]. Scripta Materialia, 2007, 57(2): 93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© China Iron and Steel Research Institute Group 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of High Temperature Materials ResearchCentral Iron and Steel Research InstituteBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations