Effects of austenizing time on wear behavior of D6 tool steel after deep cryogenic treatment

  • A AkhbarizadehEmail author
  • M A Golozar
  • A Shafeie
  • M Kholghy


The effects of the prior austenite grain size in deep cryogenic treatment on the hardness, the structural change and the wear resistance of D6 tool steel were investigated. The wear resistance of the cryogenically treated samples was determined using the pin-on-disk wear machine. The microstructural characteristics and phases present in heat treated samples were determined using SEM and XRD techniques. The results showed that the retained austenite is completely transformed to martensite during the cryogenic treatment. Besides, there is an optimum grain size of which the maximum wear resistance and hardness are obtained.

Key words

deep cryogenic treatment D6 austenizing time wear heat treatment 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    Bensely A, Prabhakaran A, Mohan Lal D, et al. Enhancing the Wear Resistance of Case Carburized Steel (En 353) by Cryogenic-Treatment [J]. Cryogenics, 2005. 45: 747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Mohan Lal D, Renganarayanan S, Kalanidhi A. Cryogenic Treatment to Augment Wear Resistance of Tool and Die Steel [J]. Cryogenics, 2001, 41: 149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Zhirafar S, Rezaeian A, Pugh M. Effect of Cryogenic Treatment on the Mechanical Properties of 4340 Steel [J]. J Mater Process Tech, 2007, 186: 298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Hübner W. Phase Transformations in Auslenitic Stainless Steels During Low Temperature Tribological Stressing [J]. Trib Int, 2001, 34: 231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Molinari A, Pellizzari M, Gialanella S, et al. Effect of Deep Cryogenic Treatment on the Mechanical Properties of Tool Steels [J]. J Mater Process Tech, 2001, 118: 350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Islam A, Ali Bepari M. Structure and Properties of Carburized and Hardened Niobium Micro-Alloyed Steels [J]. J Mater Process Tech, 1998, 74: 183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Meng F, Tagashira K, Azuma R, et al. Role of Eta-Carbide Precipitations in the Wear Resistance Improvements of Fe-12Cr-Mo-V-1.4C Tool Steel by Cryogenic Treatment [J]. ISIJ Int, 1993, 34: 205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Danil’chenko VE, Sagaradze VV, l’Heritier PH. Martensite Crystal Structure of Nickel Steel at Cryogenic Temperatures [J]. Mater Sei Eng A, 2003, 358: 26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Bensely A, Venkatesh S, Mohan Lal D, et al. Effect of Cryogenic Treatment on Distribution of Residual Stress in Case Carburized En 353 Steel [J]. Mater Sci Eng A, 2007, 479(1–2): 229.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Liu H, Wang J, Yang H, et al. Effects of Cryogenic Treatment on Microstructure and Abrasion Resistance of CrMnB High-Chromium Cast Iron Subjected to Sub-Critical Treatment [J]. Mater Sci Eng A, 2007, 178(1–2): 324.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Tabrett CP, Sare IR. Effect of High Temperature and Sub-Ambient Treatments on the Matrix Structure and Abrasion Resistance of a High-Chromium White Iron [J]. Scripta Mate, 1998, 38: 1717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Ali Khan A, Mirghani A. Improving Tool Life Using Cryogenic Cooling [J]. J Mater Process Tech, 2007, 196(1–3): 149.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Indumathi J, Bijwe J, Ghosh AK, et al. Wear of Cryo-Treated Engineering Polymers and Composites [J]. Wear, 1999, 225–229: 343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Darwin JD, Mohan Lal D, Nagarajan G. Optimization of Cryogenic Treatment to Maximize the Wear Resistance of 18%Cr Martensitic Stainless Steel by Taguchi Method [J]. J Mater Process Tech, 2007, 195(1–3): 241.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© China Iron and Steel Research Institute Group 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • A Akhbarizadeh
    • 1
    Email author
  • M A Golozar
    • 1
  • A Shafeie
    • 1
  • M Kholghy
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Materials EngineeringIsfahan University of TechnologyIsfahanIran

Personalised recommendations