Generalized shape and gauge decoupling load distribution optimization based on IGA for tandem cold mill

  • Peng PengEmail author
  • Quan Yang


Load distribution is the foundation of shape control and gauge control, in which it is necessary to take into account the shape control ability of TCM (tandem cold mill) for strip shape and gauge quality. First, the objective function of generalized shape and gauge decoupling load distribution optimization was established, which considered the rolling force characteristics of the first and last stands in TCM, the relative power, and the TCM shape control ability. Then, IGA (immune genetic algorithm) was used to accomplish this multi-objective load distribution optimization for TCM. After simulation and comparison with the practical load distribution strategy in one tandem cold mill, generalized shape and gauge decoupling load distribution optimization on the basis of IGA approved good ability of optimizing shape control and gauge control simultaneously.

Key words

load distributions immune genetic algorithm shape decoupling gauge decoupling tandem cold mill 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    CAO Jian-guo, ZHANG Jie, CHEN Xian-lin, et al. Decoupling in Setup Program of Shape and Gauge Control System on Finishing Stands of Hot Strip Mill at WISCO [J]. Iron and Steel, 2001, 36(4): 42 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    ZHU Dong-kui, ZHANG Qing-dong, CHEN Shou-qun, et al. Optimum Distribution of Loads on Tandem Cold Mill Being Helpful to Shape Control [J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing, 2000, 22(1): 80 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    YU Meng-sheng, ZHENG Bing-lin. GA Based Rolling Strategy Optimization for Cold Tandem Mill [J]. Metallurgical Industry Automation, 2001, 25(5): 12 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    LUO Yong-jun, WANG Chang-song, CAO Jian-guo, et al. Load Distribution Optimization Helpful to Shape Control of Hot Strip Mills [J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing, 2005, 27(1): 94 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    ZHANG Da-zhi, YIN Feng-fu, LI Mou-wei, et al. Optimal Design System Based on Genetic Algorithms for the Rolling Parameters of Tandem Cold Strip Mill [J]. Shanghai Metals, 2000, 22(6): 25 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    YANG Jing-ming, DOU Fu-ping, LIU Shu-hui, et al. Application of Genetic Algorithm to Rolling Schedule in Tandem Cold Mill [J]. China Mechanical Engineering, 2007, 18(5): 1868 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wang D D, Tieua A K, de Boer F G, et al. Toward a Heuristic Optimum Design of Rolling Schedules for Tandem Cold Rolling Mills [J]. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 2000, 13(4): 397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chun Jang-sung, Jung Hyun-kyo, Hahn Song-yop. A Study on Comparison of Optimization Performances Between Immune Algorithm and Other Heuristic Algorithms [J]. IEEE Trans Magn, 1998, 34(5): 2972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Luh G C, Chveh C H, Liu W W. Multi-Objective Immune Algorithm [J]. Engineering Optimization, 2003, 35(2). 143.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    de Castro, Leandro Nunes. Fundamentals of Natural Computing: An Overview [J]. Physics of Life Reviews, 2007, 4(1): 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© China Iron and Steel Research Institute Group 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Engineering Research Center for Advanced Rolling TechnologyUniversity of Science and Technology BeijingBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations