Advertisement

Theoretical Model of Steel Continuous Casting Technology

  • C. Gheorghies
  • I. Crudu
  • C. Teletin
  • C. Spanu
Article

Abstract

A theoretical model adapted for studying steel continuous casting technology was proposed. The model based on system theory contained input/output, command, and control parameters. The process was divided into five stages, i. e., tundish, mold, guiding system, guiding-drawing system, and guiding-drawing-soft reduction system. The model can be used to describe the physicochemical processes, thermal processes, chemical processes, and characteristics of the cast material according to the above-mentioned stages. It can also be applied to other metallurgical technologies and even to other industries (chemistry, food, etc.).

Key words

steel casting technology system theory modeling 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Presslinger H, Mayr M, Tragi E, et al. Assessment of the Primary Structure of Slabs and the Influence on Hot- and Cold-Rolled Strip Structure [A]. VDEh Steel Institute, ed. Proceedings of the 1st Chinese-German Metallurgy Seminar on Fundamentals of Iron and Steelmaking [C]. Beijing: The Chinese Society for Metals, 2004. 196.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Barber B, Bush A W, Tunstall J P. Strand Straightening in the Continuous Casting of Steel [J]. IMA Journal of Management Mathematics, 1996, 7(2): 181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Zaharia C, Crudu I. Study and Researches Regarding the Lubrication and Cooling During Hot Strip Milling [A]. University Dunarea de Jos, Galati ed. Proceedings of the National Tribology Conference With International Participation, ROTRIB’03 [C]. Galati, Dunarea de Jos University, 2003. R30.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Azzouz A, Gheorghies C. Modelling in the Industrial Design [M]. Galati, Evrika, 1999 (in Romanian).Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Crudu I, Ivanescu Al, Stefanescu I. Tribosystems for Integrate Manufacturing Processes in Metallurgical Industry [A]. Sireteanu T, ed. Proceedings of the Annual Symposium of the Institute of Solid Mechanics, SISOM [C]. Bucharest: Romanian Academy of Technical Science, 2006. R30.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Kajitani T, Drezet J M, Rappaz M. Numerical Simulation of Deformation-Induced Segregation in Continuous Casting of Steel [J]. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A-Physical Metallurgy and Materials Science, 2001, 32(6): 1479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Minzu V, Lang B. Automatic Command of the Continue Linear Systems [M]. Paris: Ellipses Edition Marketing, 2001 (in French).Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Morwald K, Thalhammer M, Federspiel C, et al. Metallurgical, Operational and Economic Benefits of SMART/ASTC Technology in Continuous Casting [J]. Journal of Metallurgy, 2004, 4: 301 (in French).Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Noblot A, Sutter P, Wimmer F, et al. Application of DIA-MOLD High-Speed Casting Technology at ISPAT [J]. Journal of Metallurgy, 2001, 4: 367 (in French).Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Li C, Thomas B G. Analysis of the Potential Productivity of Continuous Cast Molds [A]. Irons G, Cramb A, eds. Brimacombe Memorial Symposium [C]. Vancouver: Met Soc, 2000. 595.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Thomas B G. Modeling of the Continuous Casting of Steel: Past, Present and Future [J]. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions, 2002, 33B(6): 795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Filipic B, Robic T. A Comparative Study of Coolant Flow Optimization on a Steel Casting Machine [A]. Garrison Greenwood, ed. Proc IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC 2004) [C]. Portland: IEEE Press, 2004. 569.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Thomas B G. Modeling for Casting and Solidification Processing [M]. New York: Yu O and Marcel Dekker Editor, 2001.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    Fedakova D, Marek P. Utilization of a Numerical Model of the Temperature Field of a Continuous-Casting and Prediction Anti-Break Systems at the Continuous Caster of the Steelworks Division Plant to Improve the Production Quality at U S Steel Kosice, Ltd [J]. Acta Montanistica Slovaca, 2003, 8(4): 168.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    Köhl R, Mörwald K, Pöppl J, et al. The Dynaflex Oscillator—A Technology Breakthrough in Billet Casting [J]. Journal of Metallurgy, 2001, (1):75 (in French).Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    Dauby P H, Assar M B, Lawson G D. PIV and MFC Measurements in a Continuous Caster Mould. New Tools to Penetrate the Caster Black Box [J]. Journal of Metallurgy, 2001, (4): 353 (in French).Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    Chunsheng Li, Thomas B G. Thermo-Mechanical Finite Element Model of Shell Behavior in the Continuous Casting of Steel [A]. International Journal of Surface Science and Engineering, ed. Sixth Asia-Pacific Symposium on Engineering Plasticity and Its Applications [C]. Sydney: NSW Trans Tech, 2002. 827.Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    Ungureanu St. Sensibility of Dynamic Systems [M]. Bucharest: Technical Publishing House, 1988.Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    Crudu I, Ionescu M P, Munteanu V, et al. A Tribosystemic Approach to Refractory Lining Destruction in Blast Furnaces [J]. Wear, 1998, 216(2). 251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    Gheorghies C. Structural Changes During Friction, Wear and Fatigue Processes [M]. Bucharest: Technical Publishing House, 1994 (in Romanian).Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    Crudu I. A Principle of Tribosystemation and Tribomodeling [R]. Galati: The Annals of Dunarea de Jos University, 1999.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© China Iron and Steel Research Institute Group 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Science, Dunarea de JosUniversity of GalatiGalatiRomania
  2. 2.Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Dunarea de JosUniversity of GalatiGalatiRomania

Personalised recommendations