New non-edible Allanblackia parviflora seed oil as an alternative feedstock for biodiesel production and characterization of the fuel


This study is aimed at producing biodiesel from Allanblackia parviflora seed oil as a new non-edible alternative resource. The amount of oil extracted from the seeds was approximately 49% and was mainly composed of linoleic acids (66.68). The Allanblackia parviflora methyl esters (APME) were prepared using NaOH as a homogeneous base-catalyst for the transesterification. The rate of conversion of the triglycerides to methyl esters was determined using Gas Chromatograph with an optimum yield of 97.1%. The conditions under which this maximum yield (97.1%) was obtained include methanol to Allanblackia parviflora oil ratio of 6:1, reaction temperature of 60 ℃, NaOH concentration of 1% and reaction time of 2 h. The properties of the methyl esters were comparable to fuel properties of conventional diesel using ASTM and European Union standards. The seeds of Allanblackia parviflora can be described as promising non-edible resource.


Conventional oil from petroleum is commonly used for transportation, agriculture, trade and for power generation. The increase in the use of conventional fuel has resulted in exhaustion of the fossil resources that are already limited in supply [1]. The negative effect associated with the rising consumption of energy from petroleum reserve has generated interest for alternative resources. Biodiesel is therefore said to be the most alternative substitute to petroleum diesel [2]. It is mono-alkyl esters of long chain fatty acids which is derived from vegetable oils or animal fats. Biodiesel is renewable, non-toxic, environmentally friendly biodegradable and emit low amounts of CO, SO2, volatile organic compounds and hydrocarbon that are fully burned [3]. Biodiesel is applicable to all engines that uses diesel since the characteristics of biodiesel is similar to mineral diesel [4].

Production technologies for biodiesel include blending, transesterification, micro-emulsions and thermal cracking [5,6,7]. Transesterification is however; the popular and widely used [8]. The transesterification process is catalyzed by alkalis, acids or enzymes. Alkali catalysts have proven to be more practical and industrially, applied because of their short reaction times and less corrosive nature compared to acid catalysts. They are also less expensive when compared with enzymes [4, 9, 10].

Short chain alcohols such as methanol, ethanol and butanol are normally, used in biodiesel production. Among the mostly used alcohols, methanol is much preferred since it is less expensive and has lot of physical and chemical advantages [5,6,7]. Alkali catalysts such as sodium and potassium hydroxide are commonly, used since they produce high amount of biodiesel [11, 12].

Edible and non-edible oils are both used for biodiesel production. But presently, majority used are edible [13]. Biodiesel from edible oil is presently, affected by the issue of cost due to the competition between oil for food and fuel from edible oils; a major reason generating interest for more non-edible low-cost alternative resources [14]. Growing non-edible oil plants on commercial scale can relatively be cheaper than edible ones [15,16,17]. Non-edibles can be grown in large scale on non-cropped marginal and wastelands and this will definitely increase the desire and appreciation for “marginal lands” [10, 18].

In Ghana, the main non-edible resource for biodiesel include jatropha. However, jatropha alone cannot be sufficient for biodiesel production. Studies however, indicate that there are alternative non-edible oil-yielding crops which can be used as feedstocks [19]. An emerging and promising of them is Allanblackia parviflora oil, which has not yet been studied for biodiesel, but gaining popularity in medicinal and soap industry [20].

Allanblackia parviflora is a woody dicotyledonous plant which belongs to the Guttiferae family. The plant is evergreen and flourishes well in areas with a lot of rainfall. Allanblackia parviflora is grown in many areas of Africa including Ghana, Sierra Leone, Congo Brazzaville, Cameroon and Uganda. Studies by Ofori et al. [20] on the oil yield of Allanblackia parviflora indicate a very good oil (49%) yield. The oil has qualities suitable for producing soaps and confectionaries but not yet been exploited for biodiesel [20], thus providing a basis for this research. In this study, oil was extracted from the Allanblackia parviflora seed using Takase et al. approach [21, 22] and the amount determined [23]. The rate of conversion of the triglycerides to methyl esters was determined using Gas Chromatograph with an optimum yield of 97.1% at methanol to Allanblackia parviflora oil ratio of 6:1, reaction temperature of 60 ℃, NaOH concentration of 1% and reaction time of 2 h.


Materials and method

The Allanblackia parviflora seed was obtained from Ryte Aid Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd (Ho, Ghana). Methanol, Sodium hydroxides (NaOH), Hydrochloric acid (HCl) and anhydrous sodium sulfate were procured from School of Biological Sciences Chemical Store (University of Cape Coast, Ghana). Entire solvents had AR grade and were used without purification.

Equipment used

The instrument used in this study include oven (DGH-9140A, YIHENG), soxhlet extractor, rotatory evaporator, 250 ml three-neck reaction flask, condenser, magnetic stirrer, gas chromatograph (GC) (Agilent Technology Inc. USA), gas chromatograph mass spectra (GCMS) Agilent HP-6890 Technologies, Palo Alto, CA, USA) [21, 22].

The experimentations were carried out using 250 ml conical flask. The conical flask was heated using heating plated that has magnetic stirrer with highest heating capacity of 400 ℃ while the speed of stirring was 600 rpm. A thermometer was fixed using a retort stand that was immersed inside the beaker.

Transesterification and optimization experiments

30 g of the extracted Allanblackia parviflora oil at varied molar ratio of methanol to oil (2:1 to 8:1), varied amount of NaOH (from 0.25 to 2.0%) (reference to the weight of Allanblackia parviflora oil) at different reaction time ( 0.5 to 2.5 h) and reaction temperature (30 to 70 ℃), were reacted together in the 250 ml conical flask equipped with a condenser and magnetic stirrer (600 rpm). After each reaction, methanol was removed by means of evaporator that was rotating. Each batch of mixture was then kept in a separating funnel and allowed for 24 h for phase separation to occur. The layers in the upper portion consisted of methyl esters whilst the lower layer comprised slight glycerol. After the 24 h phase separation, the lower layer of glycerol was drawn out and the upper layer made up of biodiesel was then washed with deioned water for three times. Drying and analyses was then done [24].

Determination of biodiesel yield

Determination of the yield of the biodiesel was carried out using Takase et al. [21, 22] method with little modification. Specifically, the ramp of the oven temperature programming was kept at 175 °C for 2 min, increased to 220 °C at 25 °C/min for 3 min, then increased from 215 to 225 °C at 0.4 °C/min for 4 min and finally increased from 225 to 255 °C at 45 °C/min for 2 min. The rate of flow of hydrogen was 45 mL/min and the one for air was 410 mL/min. The injector and detector temperatures were both kept at 255 °C with pressure of injection at 100 kPa. The injection was carried out in split mode with a split ratio of 55:1. Analysis of each sample of biodiesel was done through dissolving 1 mL of the sample in 5 mL of petroleum ether (60–90 °C) mixed with tetradecane and 0.6 μL of the solution injected into the Gas Chromatography. The yields of the samples of the biodiesel were subsequently, calculated using the equation indicated below:

$$Biodiesel\;yeild = \frac{{w_{tetradecane} \times A_{B} \times f_{tetradecane} }}{{A_{tetradecane} \times w_{s} }} \times 100\%$$

Note: wtetradecane = weight of the tetradecane; AB = peak area of the biodiesel; ftetradecane = response factor; Atetradecane = peak area of the tetradecane; ws = weight of the biodiesel used.

All the data points in the study are mean values of triplicate of experimental and GC values.

Identifying the composition of the biodiesel

The compositions of the biodiesel were identified using Gas Chromatography –Mass Spectra as reported by Takase et al. [21, 22] with little modification. The carrier gas used include Helium at the rate of flow being 2.0 mL/min. The samples of biodiesel (1 μL) was injected into the column at a split ratio of 45:1. The oven temperature ramp program was done by Gas Chromatography. The composition of the biodiesel was identified by comparing the mass spectra that was obtained with NIST05.LIB and NIST05s.LIB programming software.

Determination of the properties of the biodiesel

The determination of properties of the biodiesel were done using ASTM methods. The properties of the biodiesel and the respective methods used in determining it include kinematic viscosity (mm2/s @40 °C) using ASTM D 445, flash point using D 93, sulfur content using ASTM D 4294, ash content using ASTM D 874, density (20 °C) using ASTM D 5002 and water content using ASTM D 2709. The value for the saponification number was determined by means ISO 3657. The cetane number was determined using ASTM D6890 method. The Thermogravimetric (TGA) curve was determined using TGA-50 (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) thermogravimetric equipment in range of 25 ℃ and 400 ℃ (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1

Flow chart of Allanblackia parviflora seed oil for the production of biodiesel

Discussion of the results

Characterizing Allanblackia parviflora oil

Content of Allanblackia parviflora oil (49%) per seed was comparatively high when compared with other oils (non-edible) for biodiesel. Typically, Acacia Senegal and cypress with oil contents of 9.80% and 10% respectively [25, 26]. The Allanblackia parviflora oil in addition exhibited a kinematic viscosity which is low (28.97 mm2/s) in comparison to those of jatropha, soyabeans and sunflower of 30 or 40 mm2/s at 40 ℃ [27]. The saponification number and the molecular weight were 198.84 and 889.3 g respectively. And since the Allanblackia parviflora oil contained free fatty acid of 0.58% and 0.84% water content (figure less than 1), alkaline-catalyzed transesterification was preferred [28,29,30].

Optimizing Allanblackia parviflora oil reaction parameters

Influence of molar ratio of methanol to oil

The primary reactant for the transesterification of biodiesel is the alcohol. For this research, variation of methanol was between 2:1 and 8:1 (Fig. 2) at catalyst (NaOH) amount of 1% (wt), temperature of the reaction at 60 ℃ and time of the reaction at 1.5 h. At low methanol to Allanblackia parviflora oil ratio (2:1), the biodiesel yield was equally low (73.2%). The optimum yield of biodiesel (94.6%) was acquired at 6:1. Above this molar ratio (6:1), the additional methanol had negative impact on the yield. Even though, there was reaction at ratio of 2:1, much more ratio was needed to obtain higher yield. Ratio of 8:1 also produced relatively higher yield (92.3%) (bit close) to that of molar ratio of 6:1, this molar ratio will not be economically feasible for the purpose of cost minimization [26]. This findings agrees with those of Meher et al. [31]. From the study it was obvious that to increase the yield of Allanblackia parviflora biodiesel, the actual methanol to oil molar ratio needed to increase the esters yield to maximum (94.6%) was 6:1. Any methanol to oil ratio above the limit of maximum could result in decrease in the yield, and this was possibly, as a result of dilution of the oil with the methanol. Henceforth 6:1 molar ratio of methanol to oil was selected as the optimum.

Fig. 2

Effect of Methanol: Allanblackia parviflora oil molar ratio (reaction temperature 60 °C, catalyst amount 1% and reaction time of 1.5 h)

Influence of temperature on the yield of biodiesel

Influence of temperature of the reaction on the reactions process was undertaken at ratio of methanol to oil at 6:1, NaOH amount of 1% (by wt) and reaction time of 1.5 h. Figure 3 shows variation in the rate of Allanblackia parviflora oil conversion at various temperatures (30 ℃ to 75 ℃). With increase in reaction temperature from 30 ℃ to 60 ℃, the biodiesel yield correspondingly rose from 70.1% to 94.6%. A further upward adjustment in the temperature of the reaction (from 60 to 65 ℃ and subsequently to 70 ℃) resulted in the fall in yield (92.2% and subsequently to 89.1%). Generally, high temperatures (above 50 ℃) favours reaction. But, in this case, the reaction temperature/s (above 60 °C) might have resulted in the vaporization of methanol and this might have inhibited the reaction on the methanol-oil phase. The observations in this study however, agree with previous works [31,32,33]. It was observed that even at temperature of 30 °C, there was reaction taking place; however, it could not be completed. This was possibly due to high viscosity of the Allanblackia parviflora oil at the room temperature leading to incomplete reaction within the reactant (sodium hydroxide-alcohols) [34]. The phenomenon in this case contradicts earlier studies on similar subject [35]. However, the phenomenon agrees with others previous studies on related works [36].

Fig. 3

Influence of the temperature of the reaction (1.5 h of reaction time, 6:1 methanol to oil molar ratio and 1%NaOH amount)

Influence of the amount of catalyst on the yield

Figure 4 shows the influence of the amount of catalyst on the yield of biodiesel. Ideally, when the amount of catalyst is less, optimum yield of biodiesel cannot be achieved. Meanwhile, a concentrated amount of catalyst can also lead to saponification reaction. In this study, the effect of the amount of NaOH was investigated at 1.5 h, 6:1 methanol to Allanblackia parviflora oil molar ratio and 60 °C of reaction temperature. The amount of catalyst was varied from 0.25% to 2.0%. The figures in terms of the percentages were calculated based on the weight of the oil used for the study. When the amount of catalyst was adjusted from 0.25 to 1%, the yield of the biodiesel also risen from 70.7% to 94.6% respectively. However, additional upward adjustment of the amount of NaOH (above 1%) slightly reduced the biodiesel yield.

Fig. 4

Influence of the amount of NaOH (6:1 methanol to oil molar ratio, 60 °C reaction temperature and 1.5 h reaction time)

Previous studies [31, 32] have indicated that relatively, high amount of alkaline catalyst lead to saponification reaction in the presence of high free fatty acids which subsequently result in reduced yields. In the present study, this observation was noted at 1.25% amount of catalyst; which was attributed to the fact that the Allanblackia parviflora oil used was a bit crude and had little free fatty acid concentration (< 1%). The phenomenon recorded in this study agrees with previous study on similar subject [37].

Influence of duration of the reaction of the biodiesel yield

Figure 5 shows the influence of biodiesel yield on the duration of the reaction using Allanblackia parviflora seed oil. The duration of the reaction was varied in the range of 0.5 h to 2.5 h. From Fig. 5, it can be deduced that the yield of the biodiesel was very much dependent on duration of transesterification reaction. At the beginning of the reaction (0.5 h), the yield was low due to mixing and the dispersion of methanol onto the oil. The maximum yield (97.1%) was obtained in 2 h. Further upward adjustment in the duration of the reaction of Allanblackia parviflora oil (after the optimum was reached) led to the reduction in the yield. The reduction in the yield after the optimum duration of 2 h was probably due to reversible reaction which might have taken place resulting in slight loss of esters [38]. The optimum duration of the reaction was therefore 2 h. Figure 6 shows the chromatogram of Allanblackia parviflora methyl esters at optimum reaction conditions whiles Fig. 7 shows the TGA curves of Allanblackia parviflora methyl esters in dry air atmosphere.

Fig. 5

Influence of reaction time (methanol to oil molar ratio of 6:1, reaction temperature of 60 °C and catalyst amount of 1%)

Fig. 6

Gas Chromatogram of Allanblackia parviflora methyl esters (APME) (methanol to oil molar ratio of 6:1, reaction temperature of 60 °C, reaction time of 2 h and catalyst amount of 1%)

Fig. 7

TGA curves of Allanblackia parviflora methyl esters atmospheric condition

Characterization of Allanblackia parviflora methyl ester (APME)

The APMEs that were obtained at optimum conditions (reaction temperature of 60 ℃, methanol: Allanblackia parviflora oil molar ratio of 6:1, reaction time of 2 h, catalyst amount of 1% NaOH (by wt) were subjected to characterization using GC. There was appearance of signal in the typical GC spectra (Fig. 6) after transesterification during the following time (min) and the corresponding peak (Intensity-Signal): 1 min—petroleum ether, 2.4 min—tetradecane, 7.6 min—C16:0, 11.0 min—C18:2, 11.2 min—C18:1 trans, 15.5 min—C18:0, 16 min—C20:0.

Fuel’s ignition quality is affected by properties such volatility and thermal stability [39]. On the basis of the indication of the thermogram (Fig. 7), the thermal stability of APMEs were especially, between 100 and 160 ℃. However, there was loss of mass between 160 and 900 ℃. At 700 ℃ there was an optimum speed of mass loss. The mass loss happened due to combustion or by evaporation of the methyl esters specifically; methyl linoleate and oleate that were basically the major compounds. Similar behaviour has been shown by Jatropha curcas methyl esters [40].

Properties of Allanblackia parviflora methyl ester (APME)

Fuel characteristic of the APME after determination were identified to conform to the international standard and are shown in the Table 1. The determination of the properties was to examine whether APMEs have sufficient values that could function as a candidate methyl ester. The movement of biodiesel through pipes, injector nozzles and orifices are affected by density [24]. The value of the density for APMEs was 867 kg/m3 and this was considered lower when compared with the values of other internationally accepted oils such as jatropha. The density of the APMEs (867 kg/m3) was lower than the values that were reported for other popular biodiesel such as rapeseed (882 kg/m3), soybean (884 kg/m3) and palm (876 kg/m3) methyl esters [41].

Table 1 Comparing the properties of the Allanblackia parviflora biodiesel to United States and Europe standards

Kinematic viscosity is a significant property of biodiesel since it influences the fluidity of the fuel. When biodiesel has a high viscosity, it simply indicates that there can be incomplete burning and this can lead to the formation of engine deposit and subsequently, soot formation [42, 43]. From the study, the viscosity of the biodiesel was reduced from 35.2 mm2/s (viscosity of the oil) to 4.74 mm2/s. This value was within the range specified by ASTM D 6751 and EN 1425 (1.9–6 mm2/s) and was relatively less than viscosity values of biodiesels including sunflower (4.43 mm2/s) and soybean (4.03 mm2/s) [42, 43]. This implies that APMEs with this low viscosity can easily flow through the fuel system of diesel engines.

Flash point of fuel is one of the most important property. Biodiesel's vapour will burst into flames immediately when exposed to fire or very high temperature (above 150 ℃). The lower the biodiesel flashpoint, the less risky it is to transport. Table 1 indicates that the methyl esters obtained from the Allanblackia parviflora oil had a flashpoint of 155 ℃, which is within the recommended range of ASTM D 6751 and EN 1425 (130 ℃ least) and this value is closer to those of soybean (178 ℃), olive (178 ℃) and peanut (176 ℃) methyl esters [41].

The cetane number determines ignition quality of biodiesel. The higher the cetane number, the more ignitable the biodiesel will be. In this study, the cetane number of the biodiesel was 50, which is higher than the least acceptable cetane number of 47 by ASTM D 6751 and EN 1425. The cetane value of 50 in this case was higher than that of sunflower (45) biodiesel (49) [41].

The ash value is the measure of proportion of non-ignitable matter contained in fuel [5]. The Allanblackia parviflora biodiesel had negligible ash content of 0.002% by wt. The sulfur and carbon values of 0.003% and 0.02% respectively were within the range of ASTM D 6751 and EN 1425 [31].


Allanblackia parviflora oil was obtained from Ryte Aid Chemical (Ho, Ghana) with the amount of oil per seed determined to be 49%. The crude oil was transesterificated to biodiesel using methanol in the presence of NaOH as the catalyst to obtained Allanblackia parviflora methyl esters (APMEs). Maximum yield of 97.1% was obtained at methanol to oil ratio of 6:1, reaction temperature of 60 ℃, catalyst amount of 1% and reaction time of 1 h. The properties of the APMEs were within international standards. Allanblackia parviflora oil could be proposed for use as an oil feedstock for producing biodiesel in Ghana. When compared with other vegetable oil feedstocks such as, soybean, rapeseed and sunflower Allanblackia parviflora oil could be cheap non-food oil for biodiesel production.

Availability of data and materials

All the data for this research are embedded in the manuscript. The authors want to thank Micmod Foundation for their support and also acknowledge Dr Michael Miyittah for polishing the English language.


  1. 1.

    Dennis YC, Leung X, Wu MKHL. review on biodiesel production using catalyzed transesterification. Appl Energy. 2010;87:1083–95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Marta G, Varanda G, Pinto FM. Life cycle analysis of biodiesel production. Fuel Process Technol. 2011;92:1087–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Kaya C, Hamamci C, Baysal A, Akba O, Erdogan S, Saydut A. Methyl ester of peanut (Arachis hypogea L.) seed oil as a potential feedstock for biodiesel production. Renew Energy. 2009;34:1257–60.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Jha S, Fernando S, Filip TSD. Flame temperature analysis of biodiesel blends and components. Fuel. 2008;87:1982–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Kumar G, Kumar D, Singh S, Kothari S, Bhatt S, Singh C. Continuous low cost transesterification process for the production of coconut biodiesel. Energies. 2010;3:43–560.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Weisz PB, Haag WO, Rodeweld PG. Catalytic production of high-grade fuel (gasoline) from biomass compounds by shape-delective catalysis. Science. 1979;206:57–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Ma F, Hanna MA. Biodiesel production: a review. Biores Technol. 1999;70:1–15.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Asghar MD, Mohammad G. Transesterification of waste cooking oil to biodiesel using Ca and Zr mixed oxides as heterogeneous base catalysts. Fuel Process Technol. 2012;97:45–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Ferrero GO, Faba EM, Rickert AA, Eimer GA. Alternatives to rethink tomorrow: Biodiesel production from residual and non-edible oils using biocatalyst technology. Renewable Energy. 2020;1(150):128–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Ilham Z, Nimme FH. Quantitative priority estimation model for evaluation of various non-edible plant oils as potential biodiesel feedstock. AIMS Agric Food. 2019;22:4.

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Helwani Z, Othman MR, Aziz N, Fernando WJN, Kim J. Technologies for production of biodiesel focusing on green catalytic techniques: a review. Fuel Process Technol. 2009;90:1502–14.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Saloua F, Saber C, Hedi Z. Methyl ester of [Maclura pomifera (Rafin.) Schneider] seed oil: biodiesel production and characterization. Bioresour Technol. 2010;101:3091–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Malani RS, Umriwad SB, Kumar K, Goyal A, Moholkar VS. Ultrasound–assisted enzymatic biodiesel production using blended feedstock of non–edible oils: Kinetic analysis. Energy Convers Manage. 2019;15(188):142–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Kansedo J, Lee KT, Bhatia S. Cerbera odollam (sea mango) oil as a promising non-edible feedstock for biodiesel production. Fuel. 2009;88:1148–50.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Silitonga AS, Masjuki HH, Mahlia TM, Ong HC, Kusumo F, Aditiya HB, Ghazali NN. Schleichera oleosa L oil as feedstock for biodiesel production. Fuel. 2015;15(156):63–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Silitonga AS, Masjuki HH, Mahlia TM, Ong HC, Chong WT, Boosroh MH. Overview properties of biodiesel diesel blends from edible and non-edible feedstock. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2013;1(22):346–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Milano J, Ong HC, Masjuki HH, Silitonga AS, Kusumo F, Dharma S, Sebayang AH, Cheah MY, Wang CT. Physicochemical property enhancement of biodiesel synthesis from hybrid feedstocks of waste cooking vegetable oil and Beauty leaf oil through optimized alkaline-catalysed transesterification. Waste Manage. 2018;1(80):435–49.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Hakimi MI, Ilham Z, Kohar RA. Enhancement of agro-industrial copra residue oil yield using microwave-assisted extraction. Waste Biomass Valor. 2019;10(9):2681–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Yang C-Y, Fang Z, Li B, Long Y-F. Review and prospects of Jatropha biodiesel industry in China. Renew Sust Energ Rev. 2012;16:2178–90.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Ofori D, Kehlenbeck K, Munjuga M, Jamnadass R, Asaah E, Kattah C, et al. Allanblackia species: A model for domestication of high potential tree crops in Africa. In: II International symposium on underutilized plant species: crops for the future-beyond food security 9792011. p. 311–7.

  21. 21.

    Takase M, Zhang M, Feng W, Chen Y, Zhao T, Cobbina SJ, et al. Application of zirconia modified with KOH as heterogeneous solid base catalyst to new nonedible oil for biodiesel. Energy Convers Manage. 2014;80:117–25.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Takase M, Feng W, Wang W, Gu X, Zhu Y, Li T, et al. Silybum marianum oil as a new potential non-edible feedstock for biodiesel: A comparison of its production using conventional and ultrasonic assisted method. Fuel Process Technol. 2014;123:19–26.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Kafuku G, Mbarawa M. Biodiesel production from Croton megalocarpus oil and its process optimization. Fuel. 2010;89:2556–60.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Azam MM, Waris A, Nahar NM. Prospects and potential of fatty acid methyl esters of some non-traditional seed oils for use as biodiesel in India. Biomass Bioenergy. 2005;29:293–302.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Nehdi IA, Sbihi H, Tan CP, Zarrouk H, Khalil MI, Al-Resayes SI. Characteristics, composition and thermal stability of Acacia senegal (L.) Willd. seed oil. Ind Crop Prod. 2012;36:54–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Nehdi IA. Cupressus sempervirens var. horizentalis seed oil: Chemical composition, physicochemical characteristics, and utilizations. Ind Crop Prod. 2013;41:381–5.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Anwar F, Rashid U, Ashraf M, Nadeem M. Okra (Hibiscus esculentus) seed oil for biodiesel production. Apply Energy. 2010;87:779–85.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Karmakar A, Karmakar S, Mukherjee S. Properties of various plants and animals feedstocks for biodiesel production. Biores Technol. 2010;101:7201–10.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Mol JC. Applications of olefin metathesis in the oleochemistry. In: Khosvari E, Szymanska-Buzar T, editors. Ring opening metathesis polimerisation and related chemistry. Polaica-Zdroy (Polska): Kluwer Academic Pub; 2000. p. 377–90.

    Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Kumar Tiwari A, Kumar A, Raheman H. Biodiesel production from jatropha oil (Jatropha curcas) with high free fatty acids: an optimized process. Biomass Bioenergy. 2007;31:569–75.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Meher LC, Dharmagadda VSS, Naik SN. Optimization of alkali-catalyzed transesterification of Pongamia pinnata oil for production of biodiesel. Biores Technol. 2006;97:1392–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Encinar JM, González JF, Sabio E, Ramiro MJ. Preparation and properties of biodiesel from Cynara C. ardunculus L. oil. Ind Eng Chem Res. 1999;38:2927–31.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Freedman B, Pryde E, Mounts T. Variables affecting the yields of fatty esters from transesterified vegetable oils. J Am Oil Chem Soc. 1984;61:1638–43.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Darnoko D, Cheryan M. Kinetics of palm oil transesterification in a batch reactor. J Am Oil Chem Soc. 2000;77:1263–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Stavarache C, Vinatoru M, Nishimura R, Maeda Y. Fatty acids methyl esters from vegetable oil by means of ultrasonic energy. Ultrason Sonochem. 2005;12:367–72.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Lifka J, Ondruschka B. Influence of mass transfer on the production of biodiesel. Chem Eng Technol. 2004;27:1156–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Ataya F, Dube MA, Ternan M. Single-phase and two-phase base-catalyzed transesterification of canola oil to fatty acid methyl esters at ambient conditions. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2006;45:5411–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Demirbas A. Biodiesel production via non-catalytic SCF method and biodiesel fuel characteristics. Energy Convers Manage. 2006;47:2271–82.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Ghadge SV, Raheman H. Biodiesel production from mahua (Madhuca indica) oil having high free fatty acids. Biomass Bioenergy. 2005;28:601–5.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Rodríguez RP, Sierens R, Verhelst S. Thermal and kinetic evaluation of biodiesel derived from soybean oil and higuereta oil. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2009;96:897–901.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Jain S, Sharma MP. Application of thermogravimetric analysis for thermal stability of Jatropha curcas biodiesel. Fuel. 2012;93:252–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Karaosmanoglu F. Vegetable oil fuels: a review. Energy Source. 1999;21:221–31.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Demirbas A. Progress and recent trends in biodiesel fuels. Energy Convers Manage. 2009;50:14–34.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information




MT and PKE wrote the manuscript and RK prepared the tables and figures. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammed Takase.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Takase, M., Essandoh, P.K. & Kipkoech, R. New non-edible Allanblackia parviflora seed oil as an alternative feedstock for biodiesel production and characterization of the fuel. Discov Sustain 2, 8 (2021).

Download citation


  • Biodiesel
  • Heterogeneous catalyst
  • Transesterification
  • Magnesium oxide
  • Non-edible oil
  • Allanblackia parviflora
  • NaOH