Abstract
This article reports on the findings from a study that intended to consider the validity of a model of reading comprehension. In the process of coding the resulting verbal protocols, the ‘feel’ or experience of the actual readers was lost, as was the individuality of the participants. Narratives were then developed to describe the experience of the reading and to recapture that individual nature of each reader’s approach to making sense of the texts they read. After those narratives were developed, some patterns emerged that are discussed in this article as reading styles. Some of these styles resulted in the reader developing a good understanding of what they were reading and others did not. The successful styles were classified in two ways, by the main strategy used and by the deliberateness of the readers’ construction of understanding. There are two pairs of successful reading styles discussed here, making four successful styles in total. Readers using a visualisation strategy are described as either “movie makers” for those who consciously constructed their mental movies, and as “Movie watchers” for those who experienced the process as being more receptive. The other strategy used in successful reading was questioning, either as an active “Hunter-seeker” approach or in the less-active “Wondering” style. Three styles that were not associated with successful reading are also described. Some implications for future research, and for teaching and learning are also discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Datasharing is not applicable to this paper.
References
Afflerbach P (1990) The influence of prior knowledge and text genre on readers’ prediction strategies. Journal of Reading Behavior 22:131–148
Baker L (2002) Metacognition in comprehension instruction. In: Block CC, Pressley M (eds) Comprehension instruction: research-based best practices. Guilford Press, New York, pp 77–95
Block CC, Pressley M (2001) Comprehension instruction: research-based best practices. Guilford Press, New York
Conley M (2016) Improving adolescent comprehension: developing comprehension strategies in the content areas. In: Israel SE, Duffy GG (eds) Handbook of research on reading comprehension, 2nd edn. Guilford Publications, New York, pp 406–427
Creswell JW (2007) Qualitative inquiry and research design, 2nd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
Darr C, McDowall S, Ferral H, Twist J, Watson V (2008) Progressive achievement test: reading. NZCER Press, Wellington, NZ
Davis AJ (2016) Teaching reading comprehension , Second edition. Eleanor Curtain Publishing, Hong Kong
Duke NK, Pearson PD (2002) Effective practices for developing reading comprehension. In: Farstrup AE, Samuels SJ (eds) What research has to say about reading instruction, 3rd edn. International Reading Association, Newark, Del., pp 205–242
Elley W, Croft C (1989) Assessing the difficulty of reading materials: the noun frequency method, Revised. New Zealand Council for Educational Research, Wellington
Ericsson KA, Simon HA (1993) Protocol analysis: verbal reports as data, Revised. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Evers, J. C. (2011). From the past into the future. How technological developments change our ways of data collection, transcription and analysis. Forum: Qualitative Social Research. https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-12.1.1636.
Funke C (2005) Inkspell. Chicken House, Frome Somerset
Garces-Bacsal RM, Tupas R, Kaur S, Paculdar AM, Baja ES (2018) Reading for pleasure: whose job is it to build lifelong readers in the classroom? Literacy 52(2):95–102. https://doi.org/10.1111/lit.12151
Gaskins IW, Satlow E, Pressley M (2007) Executive control of reading comprehension in the elementary school. In: Meltzer L (ed) Executive function in education. Guilford Press, New York, pp 194–215
Glenberg AM (2011) How reading comprehension is embodied and why that matters. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education 4(1):5–18
Gu Y (2014) To code or not to code: Dilemmas in analysing think-aloud protocols in learning strategies research. System 43:74–81
Israel SE (2015) Verbal protocols in literacy research: Nature of global reading development. (Routledge research in educational psychology.). Routledge, New York
Jacobs JE, Paris SG (1987) Children’s metacognition about reading: issues in definition, measurement, and instruction. Educational Psychologist 22(3 & 4):255–278
Kaplan A (2008) Clarifying metacognition, self-regulation, and self-regulated learning: what’s the purpose? Educational Psychology Review 20:477–484
Kennedy E (2014) Raising literacy achievement in high-poverty schools. Routledge, New York
Kiefer M, Pulvermüller F (2011) Conceptual representations in mind and brain: theoretical developments, current evidence and future directions. Cortex 48(7):805–825
Klingner JK, Vaughn S (1999) Promoting reading comprehension, content learning, and English acquisition through collaborative strategic reading (CSR). Reading Teacher 52:738–747
Louden W, Rohl M, Barrat-Pugh C, Brown C, Cairney T, Elderfield J et al (2005) In teachers’ hands: effective literacy teaching practices in the early years of schooling. Australian Government Department of Education, Science and Training, Canberra, ACT
McCrudden MT, Kendeou P (2014) Exploring the link between cognitive processes and learning from refutational text. J Res Reading 37(1):116–140. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2011.01527.x
McKoon G, Ratcliff R (1992) Inference during reading. Psychol Rev 99:440–466
McNaughton, S. (2007). Cultural contexts for schooling improvement. In: Redesigning pedagogy: culture, knowledge and understanding. National Institute of Education, Singapore
McNaughton S (2020) The literacy lanscape in Aotearoa New Zealand. Office of the Prime Minister of New Zealand, Wellington
National Reading Panel (2000) Teaching children to read: an evidence-based assessment of the scientific literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, MD
Parry B, Taylor L (2018) Readers in the round: children’s holistic engagements with texts. Literacy 52(2):103–110. https://doi.org/10.1111/lit.12143
Phillips LM (1988) Young readers’ inference strategies in reading comprehension. Cognition and Instruction 5(3):193–222
Pressley M (2002) Metacognition and self-regulated comprehension. In: Farstrup AE, Samuels SJ (eds) What research has to say about reading comprehension, 3rd edn. International Reading Association, Newark, Del, pp 291–309
Pressley M, Afflerbach P (1995) Verbal protocols of reading: the nature of constructively responsive reading. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ
Pressley M, Gaskins IW (2006) Metacognitively competent reading comprehension is constructively responsive reading: how can such reading be developed in students? Metacognition and Learning 1:99–113
Taylor KL, Dionne J-P (2000) Accessing problem-solving strategy knowledge: the complementary use of concurrent verbal protocols and retrospective debriefing. J Educ Psychol 92(3):413–425
Taylor SJ, Bogdan R, DeVault M (2015) Introduction to qualitative research methods: a guidebook and resource. Wiley, Hoboken
Vacca RT (2002) From efficient decoders to strategic readers. Educational Leadership 60(2):6–11
Wilhelm J, Smith M (2016) The power of pleasure reading: what we can learn from the secret reading lives of teens. English J 105(6):25
Winne PH (2001) Self-regulated learning viewed from models of information processing. In: Zimmerman BJ, Schunk DH (eds) Theories of self-regulated learning and academic achievement: an overview and analysis, 2nd edn. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, pp 153–189
Yin RK (2011) Qualitative research from start to finish. Guilford Press, New York
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
None declared.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Milne, J. Individual reading styles: a narrative approach to understanding reading behaviour. SN Soc Sci 1, 48 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-020-00054-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-020-00054-w