Management of the patella during total knee arthroplasty is a matter of constant debate. Numerous studies have assessed and compared the mechanical and clinical results of total knee arthroplasty with native as well as resurfaced patellae. However, the consensus has not been reached yet on this subject. This study aims to compare the outcome between patella resurfaced (PR) and non-resurfaced patellae (NPR) after a follow-up of minimum 10 years following total knee arthroplasty.
Materials and Methods
This is a retrospective study including 63 subjects (103 knees) who had undergone total knee arthroplasty with a follow-up of 10–14 years. In this study, we evaluated the knees implanted with either press fit condylar (PFC) sigma (Depuy, Johnson & Johnson) or Nexgen (CR flex/LPS flex) (Zimmer, Warsaw, Indiana, USA) implants. Whether to perform patella resurfacing or not and choice of implants as well as implant design (posterior stabilized/cruciate retaining) was surgeons’ preference. At final follow-up, clinical and functional outcome was assessed using Knee Society Scores (KSS), and comparison of difference between pre-op scores and scores at final follow-up among resurfaced versus non-resurfaced patellae groups was carried out. Patello-femoral function was assessed at final follow-up using Feller’s score and the results were compared between resurfaced and non-resurfaced patellae.
The mean follow-up was 140 months (range 124–168 months). There were 62 knees with their patella resurfaced and 41 knees with non-resurfaced patellae There was no significant difference in the mean pre-op Knee Society Scores between PR (46.29 ± 5.17) and NPR (47.34 ± 5.95), p value 0.34. Similarly there was no significant difference in their pre-op functional score as well PR (38.53 ± 5.14) and NPR (39.22 ± 6.79), p value 0.56. Both groups had significantly improved post-operative Knee Society Scores PR (85.95 ± 5.23) and NPR (84.65 ± 5.30). However, there is no difference between these groups, p value 0.22. Functional scores also maintained significant improvement at final follow-up. Between the two groups, the resurfaced group showed a significantly higher functional score at final follow-up: PR (70.90 ± 7.73) and NPR (66.44 ± 7.12), p value 0.02. Feller’s score at final follow-up for PR group was (23.36) and NPR group was (21.98), p value 0.001, which showed clear superiority of PR over NPR
After a minimum follow-up of 10 years, there were no differences in clinical results; however, the knee function score and patello-femoral function scoring was found to be significantly higher with patella resurfacing and it was persistent across all the subgroups we had included in the study—posterior stabilized/cruciate retaining or between implants made by two different manufacturers.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Delport, H. P. (2013). The advantage of a total knee arthroplasty with rotating platform is only theoretical: Prospective analysis of 1,152 arthroplasties. The Open Orthopaedics Journal,7, 635.
Harato, K., Bourne, R. B., Victor, J., Snyder, M., Hart, J., & Ries, M. D. (2008). Midterm comparison of posterior cruciate-retaining versus-substituting total knee arthroplasty using the Genesis II prosthesis: A multicenter prospective randomized clinical trial. The Knee,15(3), 217–221.
Waddell, D. D., Sedacki, K., Yang, Y., & Fitch, D. A. (2016). Early radiographic and functional outcomes of a cancellous titanium-coated tibial component for total knee arthroplasty. Musculoskeletal Surgery,100(1), 71–74.
Anderson, J. G., Wixson, R. L., Tsai, D., Stulberg, S. D., & Chang, R. W. (1996). Functional outcome and patient satisfaction in total knee patients over the age of 75. The Journal of Arthroplasty,11(7), 831–840.
Bonnin, M., Laurent, J. R., Parratte, S., Zadegan, F., Badet, R., & Bissery, A. (2010). Can patients really do sport after TKA? Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy,18(7), 853–862.
Bourne, R. B., Chesworth, B. M., Davis, A. M., Mahomed, N. N., & Charron, K. D. (2010). Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: Who is satisfied and who is not? Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research,468(1), 57–63.
Sensi, L., Buzzi, R., Giron, F., De Luca, L., & Aglietti, P. (2011). Patellofemoral function after total knee arthroplasty: Gender-related differences. The Journal of Arthroplasty,26(8), 1475–1480.
Petersen, W., Rembitzki, I. V., Brüggemann, G. P., Ellermann, A., Best, R., Gösele-Koppenburg, A., et al. (2014). Anterior knee pain after total knee arthroplasty: A narrative review. International Orthopaedics,38(2), 319–328.
Barrack, R. L., Bertot, A. J., Wolfe, M. W., Waldman, D. A., Milicic, M., & Myers, L. (2001). Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty: A prospective, randomized, double-blind study with five to seven years of follow-up. JBJS,83(9), 1376–1381.
Bayley, J. C., Scott, R. D., Ewald, F. C., & Holmes, G. B. (1988). Metal backed patella component failure following total knee replacement. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery,70, 668–674.
Outcome 2018; ISHKS (Indian society of hip and knee surgeons) Registry. www.ishks.com. Accessed 11 Sept 2019.
Agarwala, S., Shetty, V., Karumuri, L. K., & Vijayvargiya, M. (2018). Patellar resurfacing versus nonresurfacing with patellaplasty in total knee arthroplasty. Indian Journal of Orthopaedics,52(4), 393–298.
Axelrod, D. A., & Hayward, R. (2006). Nonrandomized interventional study designs (quasi-experimental designs) In Clinical research methods for surgeons (pp. 63–76). Totowa: Humana Press.
Insall, J. N., Dorr, L. D., Scott, R. D., & Scott, W. N. (1989). Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research,248(248), 13–14.
Kreibich, D. N., Vaz, M., Bourne, R. B., Rorabeck, C. H., Kim, P., Hardie, R., et al. (1996). What is the best way of assessing outcome after total knee replacement? Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research,331, 221–5.
Feller, J. A., Bartlett, R. J., & Lang, D. M. (1996). Patellar resurfacing versus retention in total knee arthroplasty. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery,78(2), 226–8.
Burnett, R. S., Haydon, C. M., Rorabeck, C. H., & Bourne, R. B. (2004). The john insall award: Patella resurfacing versus nonresurfacing in total knee arthroplasty: Results of a randomized controlled clinical trial at a minimum of 10 years’ follow-up. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research,428, 12–25.
Campbell, D. G., Duncan, W. W., Ashworth, M., Mintz, A., Stirling, J., Wakefield, L., et al. (2006). Patellar resurfacing in total knee replacement: A ten-year randomized prospective trial. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British Volume,88(6), 734–9.
Ogon, M., Hartig, F., Bach, C., Nogler, M., Steingruber, I., & Biedermann, R. (2002). Patella resurfacing: No benefit for the long-term outcome of total knee arthroplasty. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery,122(4), 229–234.
Waters, T. S., & Bentley, G. (2003). Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty: A prospective, randomized study. JBJS,85(2), 212–217.
Wood, D. J., Smith, A. J., Collopy, D., White, B., Brankov, B., & Bulsara, M. K. (2002). Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty: A prospective, randomized trial. JBJS.,84(2), 187–193.
Pakos, E. E., Ntzani, E. E., & Trikalinos, T. A. (2005). Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty: A meta-analysis. JBJS,87(7), 1438–1445.
Parvizi, J., Rapuri, V. R., Saleh, K. J., Kuskowski, M. A., Sharkey, P. F., & Mont, M. A. (2005). Failure to resurface the patella during total knee arthroplasty may result in more knee pain and secondary surgery. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research,438, 191–6.
Nizard, R. S., Biau, D., Porcher, R., Ravaud, P., Bizot, P., Hannouche, D., et al. (2005). A meta-analysis of patellar replacement in total knee arthroplasty. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research,432, 196–203.
Park, S. J., Jung, Y. B., Jeong, H. J., Shin, H. K., Jung, H. J., Lim, J. J., et al. (2010). Long-term results of primary total knee arthroplasty with and without patellar resurfacing. Acta Medica Okayama,64(5), 331–338.
Jung, Y. B., Park, S. J., Jung, H. J., & Chang, K. W. (2008). A Comparison of patella retention versus resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty. Journal of the Korean Orthopaedic Association,43, 65–71.
Campbell, D. G., Duncan, W. W., Ashworth, M., Mintz, A., Stirling, J., Wakefield, L., et al. (2006). Patellar resurfacing in total knee replacement: A ten-year randomised prospective trial. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British Volume,88(6), 734–9.
Ma, H. M., Lu, Y. C., Kwok, T. G., Ho, F. Y., Huang, C. Y., & Huang, C. H. (2007). The effect of the design of the femoral component on the conformity of the patellofemoral joint in total knee replacement. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British Volume,89(3), 408–12.
Pakos, E. E., Ntzani, E. E., & Trikalinos, T. A. (2005). Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty: A meta-analysis. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume,87(7), 1438–1445.
Nizard, R. S., Biau, D., Porcher, R., et al. (2005). A meta-analysis of patellar replacement in total knee arthroplasty. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research,432, 196–203.
Migliorini, F., Eschweiler, J., Niewiera, M., El Mansy, Y., Tingart, M., & Rath, B. (2019). Better outcomes with patellar resurfacing during primary total knee arthroplasty: A meta-analysis study. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery,139(10), 1445–1454.
Calvisi, V., Camillieri, G., & Lupparelli, S. (2009). Resurfacing versus nonresurfacing the patella in total knee arthroplasty: A critical appraisal of the available evidence. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery,129(9), 1261–1270.
Liu, H. C. (1984). Review of gross anatomy of the Chinese knee. Taiwan yi xue hui za zhi. Journal of the Formosan Medical Association.,83(3), 317.
Hurson, C., Kashir, A., Flavin, R., & Kelly, I. (2010). Routine patellar resurfacing using an inset patellar technique. International Orthopaedics,34(7), 955–958.
Muoneke, H. E., Khan, A. M., Giannikas, K. A., Hägglund, E., & Dunningham, T. H. (2003). Secondary resurfacing of the patella for persistent anterior knee pain after primary knee arthroplasty. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British Volume,85(5), 675–8.
Parvizi, J., Mortazavi, S. J., Devulapalli, C., Hozack, W. J., Sharkey, P. F., & Rothman, R. H. (2012). Secondary resurfacing of the patella after primary total knee arthroplasty: Does the anterior knee pain resolve? The Journal of Arthroplasty,27(1), 21–26.
Toro-Ibarguen, A. N., Navarro-Arribas, R., Pretell-Mazzini, J., Prada-Cañizares, A. C., & Jara-Sánchez, F. (2016). Secondary patellar resurfacing as a rescue procedure for persistent anterior knee pain after primary total knee arthroplasty: Do our patients really improve? The Journal of Arthroplasty,31(7), 1539–1543.
Thomas, C., Patel, V., Mallick, E., Esler, C., & Ashford, R. U. (2018). The outcome of secondary resurfacing of the patella following total knee arthroplasty: Results from the Trent and Wales Arthroplasty Register. The Knee,25(1), 146–152.
Karnezis, I. A., Vossinakis, I. C., Rex, C., Fragkiadakis, E. G., & Newman, J. H. (2003). Secondary patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty: Results of multivariate analysis in two case-matched groups. The Journal of Arthroplasty,18(8), 993–998.
Conflict of interest
No benefit in any form has been received or will be received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article.
Ethical standard statement
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by the any of the authors.
For this type of study informed consent is not required.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Thilak, J., Mohan, V. Long-Term Comparison Study of Patella Resurfacing Versus Non-resurfacing in Total Knee Arthroplasty with Minimum 10-Year Follow-Up. JOIO (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43465-020-00165-9
- Total knee arthroplasty
- Knee society score
- Patellar resurfacing
- Total knee arthroplasty