Lengthening of Massive Intercalary Cortical Allograft After Successful Graft Incorporation in Skeletally Immature Bone with Critical-Sized Defect: A Case Report with 6-year Follow-up

Abstract

Bone allograft serves as an alternative to overcome the limitation of autograft. Some concerns, such as graft rejection, infection, and low union rate, arise from the use of bone allograft since the graft is a non-living and foreign material. We reported a case of critical-sized bone defect in a skeletally immature patient treated with massive intercalary allograft that not only did it show union but also graft incorporation that allowed for subsequent bone lengthening at the site of the incorporated massive allograft. To our knowledge, there has been a report of lengthening of free-vascularized fibular autograft but not the nonvascularized one. Massive intercalary allograft that incorporates well to the host could be an option to treat critical-sized bone defect.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1

Source: internal documentation

Fig. 2

Source: internal documentation

Fig. 3

Source: internal documentation

Fig. 4

Source: internal documentation

References

  1. 1.

    Utomo, D. N., Hernugrahanto, K. D., Edward, M., Widhiyanto, L., & Mahyudin, F. (2019). International Journal of Surgery Case Reports Combination of bone marrow aspirate, cancellous bone allograft, and platelet-rich plasma as an alternative solution to critical-sized diaphyseal bone defect: A case series. International Journal of Surgery Case Reports, 58, 178–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Wang, W., & Yeung, K. W. K. (2017). Bioactive Materials Bone grafts and biomaterials substitutes for bone defect repair: A review. Bioactive Materials, 2(4), 224–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Goldberg, V. M., & Akhavan, S. (2005). Biology of bone grafts. In J. R. L. G. E. Friedlaender (Ed.), Bone Regeneration and Repair: Biology and Clinical Applications (pp. 57–65). Totowa: Humana Press Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Paley, D., Catagni, M. A., Argnani, F., Villa, A., Benedetti, G. B., Cattaneo, R., et al. (1989). Ilizarov treatment of tibialnonunions with bone loss. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 241, 146–165.

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Bullens, P. H. J., Minderhoud, N. M., de Waal Malefijt, M. C., Veth, R. P. H., Buma, P., & Schreuder, H. (2009). Survival of massive allografts in segmental oncological bone defect reconstructions. International Orthopaedics, 33, 757–760.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Zheng, X.-F., Huang, H.-Y., Ding, H.-W., Zhang, Y., & Yin, Q.-S. (2009). Reconstruction of bone defects with massive bone allograft for bone tumor treatment in 78 cases. Journal of Clinical Rehabilitative Tissue Engineering Research, 9(13), 2978–2983.

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Jamshidi, K., & Bahrabadi, M. M. A. (2017). Long-term results of osteoarticular allograft reconstruction in children with distal femoral bone tumors. Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery, 5, 296–301.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Delloye, C., Cornu, O., Druez, V., & Barbier, O. (2007). Bone allografts. What they can offer and what they cannot. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery B., 89(5), 574–579.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Stevenson, S., Emery, S. E., & Goldberg, V. M. (1996). Factors affecting bone graft incorporation. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 323, 66–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Delloye, C. (2003). How to improve the incorporation of massive allografts? La Chirurgia Degli Organi di Movimento, 88(4), 335–343.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Lindaman, L. (2001). Bone healing in children. Clinics in Podiatric Medicine and Surgery, 18(1), 97–108.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Hvid, I., Horn, J., Huhnstock, S., & Steen, H. (2016). The biology of bone lengthening. Journal of Children’s Orthopaedics, 10(6), 487–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Frisoni, T., Cevolani, L., Giorgini, A., & Dozza, B. D. D. (2012). Factors affecting outcome of massive intercalary bone allografts in the treatment of tumours of the femur. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 94-B, 836–841.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors so this research was fully funded personally.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Concepts: FM, HS. Design: FM, KDH, JA, LW, ME. Definition of intellectual content: FM, KDH, JA, LW, ME. Literature search: FM, KDH, JA, LW, ME. Clinical studies: FM, KDH, JA, LW, ME. Experimental studies: FM, KDH, JA, LW, ME. Data acquisition: FM, KDH, JA, LW, ME. Data analysis: FM, HS. Statistical analysis: FM, HS. Manuscript preparation: FM, KDH, HS. Manuscript editing: FM, KDH, HS. Manuscript review: FM, KDH, HS. Guarantor: FM, KDH, JA, LW, ME, HS.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ferdiansyah Mahyudin.

Ethics declarations

Conflicting interest

No conflict of interest in this study.

Ethical standard statement

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and accompanying images.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mahyudin, F., Hernugrahanto, K.D., Andrianus, J. et al. Lengthening of Massive Intercalary Cortical Allograft After Successful Graft Incorporation in Skeletally Immature Bone with Critical-Sized Defect: A Case Report with 6-year Follow-up. JOIO 55, 203–207 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43465-020-00087-6

Download citation

Keywords

  • Massive intercalary allograft
  • Bone lengthening
  • Critical-sized defect

MeSH Terms

  • Massive
  • Intercalary
  • Allograft
  • Lengthening
  • Critical-sized
  • Defect