Skip to main content
Log in

Self-production in an upcycling online community: shared knowledge, collaborative ideas and creation of value

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Italian Journal of Marketing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Digital communication technologies have enlarged information and knowledge opportunities for consumers to self-produce objects in a number of different industries (electronics, fashion, cosmetics, etc.). The paper aims at analyzing how upcycling practices (i.e. self-production that reuses products in the end stages of consumption) are discussed and elaborated in online communities and how these practices are linked to the knowledge sharing, collaboration and co-creation among community members, thus generating self- and co-creation of value. Using a netnographic approach applied to an Italian online community, findings reveal that the upcycling represents a well-established practice driven by several different motivations (economical, environmental, social, etc.) that determine how these empowered consumers carry out these practices in concrete terms. By discussing about their self-production practices, community members share the same language, rituals and the use of specific tools to inform their behavior, thus developing communal ideas, principles and (environmental) pro-social values. Theoretically, the paper proposes a model of interaction between online communities and self-production that shows how upcycling practices, generally conceptualized as individualistic behaviors, are upgraded and become collective in online communities through knowledge sharing and creative collaboration. In terms of managerial implications, the paper develops insights about how different types of upcyclers can be marketed in different ways by addressing them with specific offerings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, C. (2013). Makers: Per una nuova rivoluzione industriale. Milano: Etas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, S., Hamilton, K., & Tonner, A. (2018). “They were built to last”: Anticonsumption and the materiality of waste in obsolete buildings. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 37(2), 195–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andreeva, T., & Ikhilchik, I. (2011). Applicability of the SECI model of knowledge creation in Russian cultural context: Theoretical analysis. Knowledge and Process Management, 18(1), 56–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, J., Nikolaus Franke, N., & Tuertscher, P. (2016). Intellectual property norms in online communities: How user-organized intellectual property regulation supports innovation. Information Systems Research, 27(4), 724–750.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berthon, P., Pitt, L., Kietzmann, J., & McCarthy, I. P. (2015). CGIP: Managing consumer-generated intellectual property. California Management Review, 57(4), 43–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berthon, P. R., Pitt, L. F., McCarthy, I., & Kates, S. M. (2007). When customers get clever: Managerial approaches to dealing with creative consumers. Business Horizons, 50(1), 39–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhatt, D., Silverman, J., & Dickson, M. A. (2019). Consumer interest in upcycling techniques and purchasing upcycled clothing as an approach to reducing textile waste. International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education, 12(1), 118–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, D. E., Clarke, T. B., & Spekman, R. E. (2014). The emergence and impact of consumer brand empowerment in online social networks: A proposed ontology. Journal of Brand Management, 21(6), 516–531.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridgens, B., Powell, M., Farmer, G., Walsh, C., Reed, E., Royapoor, M., et al. (2018). Creative upcycling: Reconnecting people, materials and place through making. Journal of Cleaner Production, 189, 145–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brodie, R. J., Ilic, A., Juric, B., & Hollebeek, L. (2013). Consumer engagement in a virtual brand community: An exploratory analysis. Journal of Business Research, 66(1), 105–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (2001). Knowledge and organization: A social-practice perspective. Organization Science, 12(2), 98–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, C. (2005). The craft consumer: Culture, craft and consumption in a postmodern society. Journal of Consumer Culture, 5(1), 23–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catterall, M., & Maclaran, P. (2002). Researching consumers in virtual worlds: A cyberspace Odyssey. Journal of Consumer Behaviour: An International Research Review, 1(3), 228–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, T., Drennan, J., Andrews, L., & Hollebeek, L. D. (2018). User experience sharing: Understanding customer initiation of value co-creation in online communities. European Journal of Marketing, 52(5/6), 1154–1184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coppola, C., Vollero, A., & Siano, A. (2019). Oltre la sostenibilità: Un’indagine sul consumer upcycling. In XVI SIM Conference. Marketing 4.0: le sfide della multicanalità, Piacenza, Italia, 24–25 Ottobre.

  • Cova, B., Dalli, D., & Zwick, D. (2011). Critical perspectives on consumers’ role as ‘producers’: Broadening the debate on value co-creation in marketing processes. Marketing Theory, 11(3), 231–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cova, B., Ezan, P., & Fuschillo, G. (2013). Zoom sur l’autoproduction des consommateurs en relation avec l’entreprise. Revue Française de Gestion, 39(234), 115–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cova, B., Fuschillo, G., & Pace, S. (2017). Le marche siamo noi: Navigare nella cultura del consumo. Milano: Franco Angeli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Sawyer, K. (2014). Creative insight: The social dimension of a solitary moment. In M. Csikszentmihalyi (Ed.), The systems model of creativity (pp. 73–98). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faraj, S., Jarvenpaa, S. L., & Majchrzak, A. (2011). Knowledge collaboration in online communities. Organization Science, 22(5), 1224–1239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faraj, S., & Shimizu, T. (2018 February 26). Online communities and knowledge collaborations. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Business and Management. https://oxfordre.com/business/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190224851.001.0001/acrefore-9780190224851-e-146. Accessed 13 May 2020.

  • Faraj, S., von Krogh, G., Monteiro, E., & Lakhani, K. R. (2016). Special section introduction—Online community as space for knowledge flows. Information Systems Research, 27(4), 668–684.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gannon, V., & Prothero, A. (2018). Beauty bloggers and YouTubers as a community of practice. Journal of Marketing Management, 34(7–8), 592–619.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goulding, C. (2005). Grounded theory, ethnography and phenomenology: A comparative analysis of three qualitative strategies for marketing research. European Journal of Marketing, 39(3/4), 294–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grönroos, C. (2008). Service logic revisited: Who creates value? And who co-creates. European Business Review, 20(4), 298–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruen, T. W., Osmonbekov, T., & Czaplewski, A. J. (2007). Customer-to-customer exchange: Its MOA antecedents and its impact on value creation and loyalty. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 35(4), 537–549.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewer, P., & Brownlie, D. (2007). Cultures of consumption of car Aficionados: Aesthetics and consumption communities. International Journal of Sociology and Social policy, 27(3/4), 106–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollebeek, L. D., Juric, B., & Tang, W. (2017). Virtual brand community engagement practices: A refined typology and model. Journal of Services Marketing, 31(3), 204–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ind, N., Iglesias, O., & Schultz, M. (2013). Building brands together: Emergence and outcomes of co-creation. California Management Review, 55(3), 5–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iverson, J. O., & McPhee, R. D. (2002). Knowledge management in communities of practice: Being true to the communicative character of knowledge. Management Communication Quarterly, 16(2), 259–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janigo, K. A., Wu, J., & DeLong, M. (2017). Redesigning fashion: An analysis and categorization of women’s clothing upcycling behavior. Fashion Practice, 9(2), 254–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozinets, R. V. (2002). The field behind the screen: Using netnography for marketing research in online communities. Journal of Marketing Research, 39(1), 61–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozinets, R. V. (2010). Netnography: Doing ethnographic research online. Los Angeles: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozinets, R. V., & Handelman, J. (1998). Ensouling consumption: A netnographic exploration of the meaning of boycotting behavior. In J. W. Alba & J. W. Hutchinson (Eds.), NA—Advances in consumer research (Vol. 25, pp. 475–480). Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labrecque, L. I., vor dem Esche, J., Mathwick, C., Novak, T. P., & Hofacker, C. F. (2013). Consumer power: Evolution in the digital age. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 27(4), 257–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonidou, L. C., Leonidou, C. N., & Kvasova, O. (2010). Antecedents and outcomes of consumer environmentally friendly attitudes and behaviour. Journal of Marketing Management, 26(13–14), 1319–1344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nalewajek, M., & Mącik, R. (2013). Exploration of consumers’ behaviors connected with product reuse. In Diversity, technology and innovation for operational competitiveness: Proceedings of the 2013 international conference on technology innovation and industrial management (pp. S4_11–S4_23). ToKnowPress.

  • Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Hern, M. S., & Rindfleisch, A. (2009). Customer co-creation: A typology and research agenda. In N. K. Malholtra (Ed.), Review of marketing research (Vol. 6, pp. 84–106). New York: M. E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panahi, S., Watson, J., & Partridge, H. (2013). Towards tacit knowledge sharing over social web tools. Journal of Knowledge Management, 17(3), 379–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne, A. F., Storbacka, K., & Frow, P. (2008). Managing the co-creation of value. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(1), 83–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2004). Co-creation experiences: The next practice in value creation. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(3), 5–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritzer, G., & Jurgenson, N. (2010). Production, consumption, prosumption: The nature of capitalism in the age of the digital ‘prosumer’. Journal of Consumer Culture, 10(1), 13–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romero, M., & Barberà, E. (2012, September). Computer-based creative collaboration in online learning. In International conference on web-based learning (pp. 330–336). Berlin: Springer.

  • Rullani, E. (2014). Manifattura in transizione. Sinergie, Rivista di Studi e Ricerche, 93, 141–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siano, A., Golinelli, C. M., Della Volpe, M., Vollero, A., & Conte, F. (2014). Oltre il manufacturing: L’impresa diventa content provider?. In XXVI Convegno annuale di Sinergie. Manifattura: quale futuro?, 13–14 Novembre, Università di Cassino e del Lazio Meridionale (pp. 551–560).

  • Silva, L., Goel, L., & Mousavidin, E. (2009). Exploring the dynamics of blog communities: The case of MetaFilter. Information Systems Journal, 19(1), 55–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S. U., Hayes, S., & Shea, P. (2017). A critical review of the use of Wenger’s community of practice (CoP) theoretical framework in online and blended learning research, 2000–2014. Online Learning, 21(1), 209–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonnenburg, S. (2004). Creativity in communication: A theoretical framework for collaborative product creation. Creativity and Innovation Management, 13(4), 254–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sung, K., Cooper, T., & Kettley, S. (2014). Individual upcycling practice: Exploring the possible determinants of upcycling based on a literature review. In 19th International conference on sustainable innovation 2014, Copenhagen, Denmark, November 3–4 (pp. 237–244).

  • Szaky, T. (2014). Outsmart waste: The modern idea of garbage and how to think our way out of it. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Troye, S. V., & Supphellen, M. (2012). Consumer partecipation in coproduction: ‘I made it myself’ effects on consumers’ sensory perceptions and evaluations of outcome and input product. Journal of Marketing, 76(2), 33–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tseng, F. C., & Kuo, F. Y. (2014). A study of social participation and knowledge sharing in the teachers’ online professional community of practice. Computers & Education, 72, 37–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2016). Institutions and axioms: An extension and update of service-dominant logic. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44(1), 5–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vollero, A., Schultz, D. E., & Siano, A. (2019). IMC in digitally-empowering contexts: The emerging role of negotiated brands. International Journal of Advertising, 38(3), 428–449.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, M. (2016). When creative consumers go green: Understanding consumer upcycling. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 25(4), 394–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, S. C., & Fang, W. (2010). The effect of consumer-to-consumer interactions on idea generation in virtual brand community relationships. Technovation, 30(11–12), 570–581.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xie, C., Bagozzi, R. P., & Troye, S. V. (2008). Trying to prosume: Toward a theory of consumers as co-creators of value. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(1), 109–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zainuddin, N., Tam, L., & McCosker, A. (2016). Serving yourself: Value self-creation in health care service. Journal of Services Marketing, 30(6), 586–600.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, W., & Watts, S. (2008). Online communities as communities of practice: A case study. Journal of Knowledge Management, 12(4), 55–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwass, V. (2010). Co-creation: Toward a taxonomy and an integrated research perspective. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 5(1), 11–48.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carla Coppola.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Coppola, C., Vollero, A., Conte, F. et al. Self-production in an upcycling online community: shared knowledge, collaborative ideas and creation of value. Ital. J. Mark. 2020, 231–248 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43039-020-00010-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43039-020-00010-9

Keywords

Navigation