Skip to main content
Log in

Joint Contact Forces with Changes in Running Stride Length and Midsole Stiffness

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Science in Sport and Exercise Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine if lower extremity joint loading was influenced by stride length or shoe midsole cushioning. Ten subjects completed 10 trials of overground running at an average speed of 4.43 m/s in each of three conditions: normal running, running with a stride length (SL) reduced by 10% of normal, and running with a cushioned midsole stiffness (i.e., mechanical impact reduction of 13.7–10.9 g). Reaction forces calculated from inverse dynamics were summed with muscle forces estimated from a musculoskeletal model using static optimization to obtain joint contact forces at the hip, knee and ankle joints. Peak components of the contact forces [axial, anterior–posterior, and medial–lateral (ML)] were examined using parametric statistics (α = 0.05). Reducing stride length resulted in significant decreases in absolute peak ankle contact forces in the axial direction (normal: − 14.5 ± 1.5 BW; reduced SL: − 14.0 ± 1.6 BW) and the ML direction (normal: 0.67 ± 0.23 BW; reduced SL: 0.61 ± 0.21 BW). Reducing stride length also reduced the peak absolute axial forces at the knee (normal: − 10.6 ± 1.3 BW; reduced SL: − 9.8 ± 1.2 BW) and the hip (normal: − 7.26 ± 2.24 BW; reduced SL: − 6.75 ± 2.10 BW). The cushioned shoe did not statistically reduce the peak absolute contact forces from the normal stride condition at any of the joints. Post hoc stress analysis suggested that the observed changes in anterior hip force would increase stress more than any of the other statistically significant results. Reductions in stride length appear to decrease some joint contact variables but cushioning in the heel region of the shoe does not.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Almeida SA, Williams KM, Shaffer RA, Brodine SK. Epidemiological patterns of musculoskeletal injuries and physical training. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1999;31(8):1176–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Arendt E, Agel J, Heikes C, Griffiths H. Stress injuries to bone in college athletes: a retrospective review of experience at a single institution. Am J Sports Med. 2003;31(6):959–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Arnold EM, Ward SR, Lieber RL, Delp SL. A model of the lower limb for analysis of human movement. Ann Biomed Eng. 2010;38(2):269–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. ASTM F. Standard test method for cushioning properties of athletic shoes using an impact test. American Society for Testing and Material. 1976.

  5. Bennell KL, Malcolm SA, Thomas SA, Wark JD, Brukner PD. The incidence and distribution of stress fractures in competitive track and field athletes: a twelve-month prospective study. Am J Sports Med. 1996;24(2):211–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Brunet ME, Cook SD, Brinker MR, Dickinson JA. A survey of running injuries in 1505 competitive and recreational runners. J Sports Med Phys Fit. 1990;30(3):307–15.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Burdett RG. Forces predicted at the ankle during running. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1982;14(4):308–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Cavanagh PR, Lafortune MA. Ground reaction forces in distance running. J Biomech. 1980;13(5):397–406.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. L. Lawrence Earlbaum Associates: Hillsdale; 1988. p. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Croker SL, Clement JG, Donlon D. A comparison of cortical bone thickness in the femoral midshaft of humans and two non-human mammals. HOMO – J Comp Hum Biol. 2009;60(6):551–65.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Crowninshield RD, Brand RA. A physiologically based criterion of muscle force prediction in locomotion. J Biomech. 1981;14(11):793–801.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Davis IS, Bowser BJ, Mullineaux DR. Greater vertical impact loading in female runners with medically diagnosed injuries: a prospective investigation. Br J Sports Med. 2016;50(14):887–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Derrick TR, Hamill J, Caldwell GE. Energy absorption of impacts during running at various stride lengths. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1998;30(1):128–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Edwards WB. Modeling overuse injuries in sport as a mechanical fatigue phenomenon. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2018;46(4):224–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Edwards WB, Gillette JC, Thomas JM, Derrick TR. Internal femoral forces and moments during running: implications for stress fracture development. Clin Biomechan. 2008;23(10):1269–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Edwards WB, Taylor D, Rudolphi TJ, Gillette JC, Derrick TR. Effects of stride length and running mileage on a probabilistic stress fracture model. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009;41(12):2177–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Glitsch U, Baumann W. The three-dimensional determination of internal loads in the lower extremity. J Biomech. 1997;30(11–12):1123–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Meardon SA, Willson JD, Gries SR, Kernozek TW, Derrick TR. Bone stress in runners with tibial stress fracture. Clin Biomech. 2015;30(9):895–902.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Meardon SA, Willson JD, Kernozek TW, Duerst AH, Derrick TR. Shoe cushioning affects lower extremity joint contact forces during running. Footwear Sci. 2018;10(2):109–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Miller RH, Hamill J. Computer simulation of the effects of shoe cushioning on internal and external loading during running impacts. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng. 2009;12(4):481–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Nigg BM, Herzog W, Herzog W. Biomechanics of the musculo-skeletal system, vol 192. New York: Wiley; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rooney BD, Derrick TR. Joint contact loading in forefoot and rearfoot strike patterns during running. J Biomech. 2013;46(13):2201–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sasimontonkul S, Bay BK, Pavol MJ. Bone contact forces on the distal tibia during the stance phase of running. J Biomech. 2007;40(15):3503–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Scott SH, Winter DA. Internal forces of chronic running injury sites. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1990;22(3):357–69.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Shorten M, Mientjes MI. The ‘heel impact’ force peak during running is neither ‘heel’ nor ‘impact’ and does not quantify shoe cushioning effects. Footwear Sci. 2011;3(1):41–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Söderkvist I, Wedin PÅ. Determining the movements of the skeleton using well-configured markers. J Biomech. 1993;26(12):1473–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Vaughan CL, Davis BL, Jeremy CO. Dynamics of human gait. Champaign: Human Kinetics; 1992. p. 17–22.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Timothy R. Derrick.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Thomas, J.M., Edwards, W.B. & Derrick, T.R. Joint Contact Forces with Changes in Running Stride Length and Midsole Stiffness. J. of SCI. IN SPORT AND EXERCISE 2, 69–76 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42978-019-00027-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42978-019-00027-3

Keywords

Navigation