Skip to main content
Log in

Sensitivity analysis of complex shear modulus using Hirsch model

  • Published:
International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present work evaluates the factors that affecting estimation of the Complex Shear Modulus (G*) of a binder when this estimation is done through an indirect approach: the Hirsch model. This technique consists of (i) testing specimens for dynamic modulus (E*) and (ii) back calculating the G* using the Hirsch model. To this purpose, four virgin asphalt binders were performance-graded with frequency sweeps to determine the appropriate properties. The data obtained from the laboratory tests were used in the Hirsch model for E* prediction. Subsequently, the Bulk Specific Gravity (Gsb) and G* were altered to determine the sensitivity of the Hirsch model to these estimations in terms of E*. Finally, the Gsb was altered, and the G* was estimated. The results showed that the estimation of G* presents more reproducibility for higher temperatures and lower frequencies. In conclusion, the estimation G* in hot mix asphalt designs using the Hirsch model is a promising alternative.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. Copeland, Reclaimed asphalt pavement in asphalt mixtures: State of the practice. FHWA-HRt-11-021. Federal Highway Administration, McLean, 2011.

  2. K. R. Hansen, A. Copeland, Annual asphalt pavement industry survey on recycled materials and warm-mix asphalt usage: 2009–2012, National Asphalt Pavement Association, Lanham, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  3. M. D. Nazzal, W. A. A. Mogawer, L. A. Qtaish, S. Kaya, Multi-scale evaluation of the effect of rejuvenators on the performance of high RAP content mixtures, Constr. Build. Mater. 101 (2015) 50–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. J. Shen, S. Amirkhanian, J. Aune Miller, Effects of rejuvenating agents on superpave mixtures containing reclaimed asphalt pavement., J. Mater. Civil Eng. 19 (5) (2017) 376–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. R. Miró, G. Valdés, A. Martínez, P. Segura, C. Rodríguez, Evaluation of high modulus mixture behaviour with high reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP) percentages for sustainable road construction, Constr. Build. Mater. 25 (10) (2011) 3854–3862.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. G. Valdés, F. Pérez-Jiménez, R. Miró, A. Martínez, R. Botella, Experimental study of recycled asphalt mixtures with high percentages of reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP), Constr. Build. Mater. 25 (3) (2011) 1289–1297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. X. Li, M. Marasteanu, R. Williams and T. Clyne, Effect of reclaimed asphalt pavement (proportion and type) and binder grade on asphalt mixtures., J. Transp. Res. Brd. 2051 (2008) 90–97.

    Google Scholar 

  8. American Association of State and Highway Transportation Officials, Standard Method of Test for Quantitative Extraction and Recovery of Asphalt Binder from Asphalt Mixtures. AASHTO T 319. Washington, 2015.

  9. R. West, A. Kvasnak, High-RAP-Content Mixes, Better Roads, 77 (10) (2007) 68–70.

    Google Scholar 

  10. American Association of State and Highway Transportation Officials, Standard method of test for determining dynamic modulus of hot mix asphalt (HMA). AASHTO TP 62. Washington, 2007.

  11. D. W. Christensen Jr, T. Pellinen, R. F. Bonaquist, Hirsch model for estimating the modulus of asphalt concrete, Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, 72 (2003) 97–121.

    Google Scholar 

  12. M. M. Robbins, D. Timm, Evaluation of Dynamic Modulus Predictive Equations for NCAT Test Track Asphalt Mixtures, 2011.

  13. R. S. McDaniel and R. M. Anderson, Recommended use of reclaimed asphalt pavement in the superpave mix design method: technician’s manual. NCHRP report 452. National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Washington, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  14. A. Kvasnak, R. West, J. Michael, L. Loria, E. Hajj, N. Tran, Bulk Specific Gravity of Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement Aggregate: Evaluating the Effect on Voids in Mineral Aggregate, Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Brd. 2180 (2010) 30–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. American Association of State and Highway Transportation Officials, Standard Method of Test for Bulk Specific Gravity (Gmb) of Compacted Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) Using Saturated Surface-Dry Specimens. AASHTO T 166. Washington, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  16. American Association of State and Highway Transportation Officials, Standard Method of Test for Determining the Rheological Properties of Asphalt Binder Using a Dynamic Shear Rheometer (DSR). AASHTO T 315. Washington, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  17. American Society for Testing and Materials, Standard Test Method for Preparation and Determination of the Relative Density of Asphalt Mix Specimens by Means of the Superpave Gyratory Compactor. ASTM D6925. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  18. A. J. Taylor, N. H. Tran, Results of Inter-Laboratory Study for AMPT Pooled Fund Study TPF-5 (178), (NCAT Report 14–01), 2014.

  19. American Society for Testing and Materials, Standard Test Method for Determining the Rheological Properties of Asphalt Binder Using a Dynamic Shear Rheometer. ASTM D7175. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Júlia C. Mendes.

Additional information

Peer review under responsibility of Chinese Society of Pavement Engineering.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Padula, F.R.G., Nicodemos, S., Mendes, J.C. et al. Sensitivity analysis of complex shear modulus using Hirsch model. Int. J. Pavement Res. Technol. 12, 125–130 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42947-019-0016-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42947-019-0016-1

Keywords

Navigation