Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Performance Evaluation of Distance Relay in the Presence of Voltage Source Converters-Based HVDC Systems

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Electrical Engineering & Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Voltage source converters (VSC)-based high voltage direct current (HVDC) link is an economical option for the long distance bulk power transmission, and it can be used to interconnect the offshore wind farms with an AC grid. Due to the penetration of VSC-HVDC system into the AC grid, the performance of the distance relay gets affected when a transmission line close to the point of common coupling (PCC) subjected to power system disturbances. In such condition, the PCC voltage is increased due to the VSC-HVDC control action, that causes the Zone-2 fault can be seen as a Zone-3 fault. As a result, the miscoordination of Zone-2 protection can occur in the distance relays. This paper presents both the analytical and simulation studies carried out on a VSC-HVDC system influence on the distance relay performance under fault conditions using PSCAD/EMTDC. Simulation results show that the presence of VSC-HVDC system greatly affects the performance of the Zone-2 and Zone-3 relay in an AC transmission line. Besides, the maloperation of the Zone-2 and Zone-3 relay is mitigated by varying the AC voltage reference input of the decoupled d-q controller of VSC-HVDC. Also, the effect of fault resistance on Zone-1 ground relay performance is analyzed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Perveen R, Kishor N, Mohanty SR (2014) Offshore wind farm development: present status and challenges. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 29:780–792

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Torres-Olguin RE, Molinas M, Undeland T (2012) Offshore wind farm grid integration by VSC technology with LCC based HVDC transmission. IEEE Trans Sustain Energy 3(4):899–907

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Alyami HH (2014) Protective relay models for electromagnetic transient simulation

  4. Novosel D, Phadke A, Saha MM, Lindahl S (1997) Problems and solutions for microprocessor protection of series compensated lines. In: Proc. Inst. Elect. Eng. Conf. Developments in Power System Protection, pp 18–23

  5. Dash PK, Pradhan AK, Panda G, Liew AC (2000) Digital protection of power transmission lines in the presence of series connected FACTS devices. In: Proc. IEEE Power Eng. Soc. Winter Meeting, 3, pp 1967–1972

  6. Khederzadeh M (2002) The impact of FACTS device on digital multifunctional protective relays. In: Proc. IEEE Power Eng. Soc. transmission and distribution conf. exhibit., Asia Pacific, 3, pp 2043–2048

  7. Wang WG, Yin XG, Yu J, Duan XZ, Chen DS (1998) The impact of TCSC on distance protection relay. In: Proc. Int. Conf. Power System Technology (POWERCON’98), 1, pp 18–21

  8. El-Arroudi K, Joos G, McGillis DT (2002) Operation of impedance protection relays with the STATCOM. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 17(2):381–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sidhu TS, Varma RK, Gangadharan PK, Albasri FA, Ortiz GR (2005) Performance of distance relays on shunt—FACTS compensated transmission lines. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 20(3):1837–1845

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sham MV, Vittal KP (2011) Simulation studies on the distance relay performance in the presence of STATCOM. J Electr Eng 11(3):8

    Google Scholar 

  11. Zhou X, Wang H, Aggarwal RK, Beaumont P (2006) Performance evaluation of a distance relay as applied to a transmission system with UPFC. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 21(3):1137–1147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Alizadeh M, Khodabakhshi-Javani N, Gharehpetian GB, Abyaneh HA (2015) Performance analysis of distance relay in presence of unified interphase power controller and voltage-source converters-based inter phase controller. IET Gener Transm Distrib 9(13):1642–1651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang H (2014) The protection of transmission networks containing ac and dc circuits. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Bath

  14. He L, Liu CC, Pitto A, Cirio D (2014) Distance protection of AC grid with HVDC-connected offshore wind generators. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 29(2):493–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Slootweg JG, De Haan SWH, Polinder H, Kling WL (2003) General model for representing variable speed wind turbines in power system dynamics simulations. IEEE Trans Power Syst 18(1):144–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Deng F, Chen Z (2011) An offshore wind farm with DC grid connection and its performance under power system transients. In: Proc. IEEE Power Energy Soc. Gen. Meeting, Detroit Michigan, USA, pp 1–7

  17. Anaya-Lara O, Campos-Gaona D, Moreno-Goytia E, Adam G (2014) Offshore wind energy generation: control, protection and integration to electrical systems. Wiley, Chichester

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. Krause P, Wasynczuk O, Sudhoff SD, Pekarek S (2013) Analysis of electrical machinery and drive systems. Wiley, Hoboken

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. Kontos E, Pinto RT, Rodrigues S, Bauer P (2015) Impact of HVDC transmission system topology on multiterminal DC network faults. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 30(2):844–852

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Leterme W, Tielens P, De Boeck S, Van Hertem D (2014) Overview of grounding and configuration options for meshed HVDC grids. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 29(6):2467–2475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kontos E, Pinto RT, Bauer P (2013) Control and protection of VSC-based multi-terminal DC networks. M.S. Thesis, Dept. Elect. Sustain. Energy, Delft Univ. of Technology, Delft, Netherlands

  22. Bajracharya C, Molinas M, Suul JA, Undeland TM (2008) Understanding of tuning techniques of converter controllers for VSC-HVDC. In: Proc. nordic workshop on power and ind. electron. (NORPIE/2008), Espoo, Finland, pp 1–6

  23. Xu L, Li S (2010) Analysis of HVDC control using conventional decoupled vector control technology. In: Proc. IEEE Power Energy Soc. Gen. Meeting, Minnesota, USA, pp 1–8

  24. Jovcic D, Ahmed K (2015) High voltage direct current transmission: converters, systems and DC grids. Wiley, Scotland

    Book  Google Scholar 

  25. Langella R, Testa A (2014) IEEE recommended practice and requirements for harmonic control in electric power systems

  26. Eissa MM (2006) Ground distance relay compensation based on fault resistance calculation. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 21(4):1830–1835

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Model setting calculations for typical IEDs line protection setting guide lines protection system audit checklist recommendation for protection management, New Delhi, March 2014

  28. Ma J, Xiang X, Li P, Deng Z, Thorp JS (2016) Adaptive distance protection scheme with quadrilateral characteristic for extremely high-voltage/ultra-high-voltage transmission line. IET Gener Transm Distrib 11(7):1624–1633

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Mohan.

Appendix

Appendix

Mho relay zone setting calculation:

Positive sequence impedance is given by,

$$Z_{1} = 0.423966868\angle 85.32710681^{ \circ } \; = \left( {0.034539303 + {\text{j}}0.422557619} \right) \varOmega /{\text{km}}$$

Zero sequence impedance is given by,

$$Z_{0} = 1.177029529\angle 75.34458819^{ \circ } \; = \left( {0.297794508 + {\text{j}}1.138734799} \right) \varOmega / {\text{km}}$$

Zero sequence compensation factor (k) is calculated as,

$$k = \frac{{Z_{0} - Z_{1} }}{{Z_{1} }} = 1.799737023\angle - 15.50972219^{ \circ }$$

Positive sequence impedance for 200 km line is given by,

$$\begin{aligned} & = 200 \times \left( {0.423966868\angle 85.32710681^{ \circ } } \right) \\ & = 84.7933736\angle 85.32710681^{ \circ } \\ & = \left( {6.907860686 + {\text{j}}84.51152387} \right) \varOmega \\ \end{aligned}$$

Zone-1 reach setting is calculated as,

$$\begin{aligned} & = 0.8 \times \left( {84.7933736\angle 85.32710681^{ \circ } } \right) \\ & = 67.83469888\angle 85.32710681^{ \circ } \\ & = \left( {5.526288549 + j67.6092191} \right) \varOmega \\ \end{aligned}$$

Zone-1 mho circle radius

$$\begin{aligned} & = 33.91734944\angle 85.32710681^{ \circ } \\ & = \left( {2.763144275 + j33.80460955} \right) \varOmega \\ \end{aligned}$$

Zone-2 reach setting is calculated as,

$$\begin{aligned} & = 1.2 \times \left( {84.7933736\angle 85.32710681p} \right) \\ & = 101.7520483\angle 85.32710681p \\ & = \left( {8.289432822 + j101.4138286} \right) \varOmega \\ \end{aligned}$$

Zone-2 mho circle radius

$$\begin{aligned} & = 50.87602415\angle 85.32710681^{ \circ } \\ & = \left( {4.144716411 + j50.70691431} \right) \varOmega \\ \end{aligned}$$

Zone-3 reach setting is calculated as,

$$\begin{aligned} & = 2.2 \times \left( {84.7933736\angle 85.32710681^{ \circ } } \right) \\ & = 186.5454219\angle 85.32710681^{ \circ } \\ & = \left( {15.19729351 + j185.9253525} \right) \varOmega \\ \end{aligned}$$

Zone-3 mho circle radius

$$\begin{aligned} & = 93.27271096\angle 85.32710681^{ \circ } \\ & = \left( {7.598646755 + j92.96267626} \right)\varOmega \\ \end{aligned}$$

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mohan, M., Vittal, K.P. Performance Evaluation of Distance Relay in the Presence of Voltage Source Converters-Based HVDC Systems. J. Electr. Eng. Technol. 14, 69–83 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42835-018-00026-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42835-018-00026-4

Keywords

Navigation