Skip to main content
Log in

Interfacial area measurement with new algorithm for grouping bubbles by diameter

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experimental and Computational Multiphase Flow Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 05 February 2022

This article has been updated

Abstract

Many industrial systems make use of two-phase flows for processing or safety applications. Modeling these flows is essential for ensuring safety and engineering optimization. In general, these flows are modeled using the two-fluid model. Two key parameters in the two-fluid model are void fraction and interfacial area concentration. To improve model accuracy, the bubbles are typically broken up into groups based on transport properties and modeled separately. Such models must be validated using experimental data, which is often collected using intrusive probes such as electrical conductivity or optical void probes. Current algorithms for converting the signals from these instruments into void and interfacial area measurements struggled with missing interfaces due to signal rise and fall time. These types of instruments also use the chord length to classify the “group” of a bubble, which can lead to incorrect grouping behavior. In this paper, a new dynamic signal processing method and a grouping algorithm based on calculating bubble diameter have been introduced in an attempt to correct these inaccuracies. The ability of the new algorithm is to correctly identify smaller bubbles and to more accurately identify bubble signals is demonstrated by comparison of the output logic pulse for both the old and new algorithms with the same input signal. The new bubble size calculation means that a number of bubbles that were previously classified as “spherical/distorted” are now classified as “cap/slug/churn” bubbles. This leads to changes in average bubble properties. While these changes were expected in several cases, the increase was larger than the reported uncertainty of the instruments. This may indicate significant shortcomings in data analyzed using the previous algorithms. Additional data collection and analysis is required in order to evaluate this possibility. However, the new algorithm has a significant weakness: the bubble diameter calculation increases the computational t ime by an order of magnitude.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

References

  • Calderbank, P. H., Moo-Young, M. B. 1961. The continuous phase heat and mass-transfer properties of dispersions. Chem Eng Sci, 16: 39–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delhaye, J. M., Achard, J. L. 1976. On the averaging operators introduced in two-phase flows modeling. In: Proceedings of the OECD/NEA Specialists Meeting on Transient Two-Phase Flow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fu, X. Y., Ishii, M. 2003. Two-group interfacial area transport in vertical air–water flow: I. Mechanistic model. Nucl Eng Des, 219: 143–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hibiki, T., Ishii, M. 2000. Two-group interfacial area transport equations at bubbly-to-slug flow transition. Nucl Eng Des, 202: 39–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ishii, M., Kim, S. 2001. Micro four-sensor probe measurement of interfacial area transport for bubbly flow in round pipes. Nucl Eng Des, 205: 123–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ishii, M., Kojasoy, G. 1993. Interfacial area transport equation and preliminary considerations on closure relations. Purdue University Report, PU NE-93-6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishii, M., Mishima, K. 1984. Two-fluid model and hydrodynamic constitutive relations. Nucl Eng Des, 82: 107–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ishii, M., Revankar, S. T. 1991. Measurement of interfacial area using four sensor probe in two phase flow. NASA STI/Recon Technical Report N, 91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishii, M., Zuber, N. 1979. Drag coefficient and relative velocity in bubbly, droplet or particulate flows. AIChE J, 25: 843–855.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishii, M. 1975. Thermo-Fluid Dynamic Theory of Two-Phase Flow. Paris: Eyrolles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kataoka, I., Ishii, M., Serizawa, A. 1984. Local formulation of interfacial area and its measurements in two-phase flow. Argonne National Laboratory Report: NUREG series, ANL-84-68.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kataoka, I., Ishii, M., Serizawa, A. 1986. Local formulation and measurements of interfacial area concentration in two-phase flow. Int J Multiphase Flow, 12: 505–529.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kataoka, I., Ishii, M., Serizawa, A. 1994. Sensitivity analysis of bubble size and probe geometry on the measurements of interfacial area concentration in gas–liquid two-phase flow. Nucl Eng Des, 146: 53–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kataoka, I., Serizawa, A. 1990. Interfacial area concentration in bubbly flow. Nucl Eng Des, 120: 163–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S., Fu, X. Y., Wang, X., Ishii, M. 2000. Development of the miniaturized four-sensor conductivity probe and the signal processing scheme. Int J Heat Mass Transfer, 43: 4101–4118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kocamustafaogullari, G., Ishii, M. 1995. Foundation of the interfacial area transport equation and its closure relations. Int J Heat Mass Transfer, 38: 481–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neal, L. G., Bankoff, S. G. 1963. A high resolution resistivity probe for determination of local void properties in gas–liquid flow. AIChE J, 9: 490–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paranjape, S. 2016. Bubble diameter calculation. E-mail interview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, M. J. D. 1970. A Fortran subroutine for solving systems of non-linear algebraic equations. In: Numerical Methods for Nonlinear Algebraic Equations. Gordon and Breach, 87–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rayleigh, L. 1878. On the instability of jets. Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society, s1-10: 4–13.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Shen, X. Z., Mishima, K., Nakamura, H. 2008. A method for measuring local instantaneous interfacial velocity vector in multi-dimensional two-phase flow. Int J Multiphase Flow, 34: 502–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen, X. Z., Nakamura, H. 2013. Local interfacial velocity measurement method using a four-sensor probe. Int J Heat Mass Transfer, 67: 843–852.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen, X. Z., Nakamura, H. 2014. Spherical-bubble-based four-sensor probe signal processing algorithm for two-phase flow measurement. Int J Multiphase Flow, 60: 11–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen, X. Z., Saito, Y., Mishima, K., Nakamura, H. 2005. Methodological improvement of an intrusive four-sensor probe for the multidimensional two-phase flow measurement. Int J Multiphase Flow, 31: 593–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talley, J. D., Worosz, T., Kim, S. 2015. Characterization of horizontal air–water two-phase flow in a round pipe part II: Measurement of local two-phase parameters in bubbly flow. Int J Multiphase Flow, 76: 223–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. P. Schlegel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mills, C.S.L., Schlegel, J.P. Interfacial area measurement with new algorithm for grouping bubbles by diameter. Exp. Comput. Multiph. Flow 1, 61–72 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42757-019-0012-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42757-019-0012-3

Keywords

Navigation