Skip to main content
Log in

Internal incentives and operations strategies for the water-saving supply chain with cap-and-trade regulation

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Engineering Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Faced with the rapid development of modern industries of agriculture, manufacturing, and services, water resources are becoming increasingly scarce. Industries with high water consumption are generally regulated by the government’s water cap-and-trade (CAT) regulation to solve the contradiction between the limited water supply and the rapid growing water demand. Supply chain equilibrium and coordination models under the benchmark scenario without water saving and CAT regulation, water-saving supply chain equilibrium and coordination models under the scenario without/with CAT regulation are developed, analyzed and compared. The corresponding numerical and sensitivity analyses for all models are conducted and compared, and the managerial insights and policy recommendations are summarized in this article. The results indicate that (1) Conducting water saving could improve effectively the operational performance of the water-saving supply chain under the scenario without/with CAT regulation. (2) The coordination strategy based on the revenue sharing contract could efficiently coordinate the water-saving supply chain, enhance water consumption reduction rate, and improve the operational performance of the water-saving supply chain. (3) The implementation of CAT regulation enhances effectively water-consumption-reduction in the water-saving supply chain and improves the operational performance of water-saving supply chain. (4) Simultaneous implementation of CAT regulation by the government and adopting coordination strategy by the water-saving supply chain would be superior to any other scenarios/strategies. (5) A suitable water cap based on the industrial average water consumption and historical water consumption data are beneficial for constructing reasonable and effective incentive mechanism. (6) A higher marginal trade price could induce more reduction in water consumption and create better operational performance for the manufacturer and water-saving supply chain, both under the equilibrium and coordination strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Campisano A, D’Amico G, Modica C (2017). Water saving and cost analysis of large-scale implementation of domestic rain water harvesting in minor Mediterranean Islands. Water (Basel), 9(12): 1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao H, Wei T, Lou I, Yang Z, Shen Z, Li Y (2014). Water saving effect on integrated water resource management. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 93: 50–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilg A, Barr S (2006). Behavioural attitudes towards water saving? Evidence from a study of environmental actions. Ecological Economics, 57(3): 400–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu Y, Moiwo J P, Yang Y, Han S, Yang Y (2010). Agricultural watersaving and sustainable groundwater management in Shijiazhuang Irrigation District, North China Plain. Journal of Hydrology (Amsterdam), 393(3–4): 219–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ji J, Zhang Z, Yang L (2017). Comparisons of initial carbon allowance allocation rules in an O2O retail supply chain with the cap-and-trade regulation. International Journal of Production Economics, 187: 68–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khatib J M (2015). Energy, Environmental & Sustainable Ecosystem Development: International Conference on Energy, Environmental & Sustainable Ecosystem Development (EESED 2015). Singapore: World Scientific

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Liu H, Guo J, He W (2014). The research on subject behavioral risk of whole life-cycle water conservation projects. Frontiers of Engineering Management, 1(4): 348–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu Y, Shang C (2014). The environmental impact of the three gorges project and the countermeasures. Frontiers of Engineering Management, 1(2): 120–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luckmann J, Grethe H, McDonald S (2016). When water saving limits recycling: Modelling economy-wide linkages of wastewater use. Water Research, 88: 972–980

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monaco F, Sali G, Hassen M B, Facchi A, Romani M, Valè G (2016). Water management options for rice cultivation in a temperate area: A multi-objective model to explore economic and water saving results. Water (Basel), 8(8): 1–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Nikouei A, Zibaei M, Ward F A (2012). Incentives to adopt irrigation water saving measures for wetlands preservation: An integrated basin scale analysis. Journal of Hydrology (Amsterdam), 464–465: 216–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Novak J, Melenhorst M, Micheel I, Pasini C, Fraternali P, Rizzoli A E (2018). Integrating behavioural change and gamified incentive modelling for stimulating water saving. Environmental Modelling & Software, 102: 120–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ørum J E, Boesen M V, Jovanovic Z, Pedersen S M (2010). Farmers’ incentives to save water with new irrigation systems and water taxation–A case study of Serbian potato production. Agricultural Water Management, 98(3): 465–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson J M, Ding Y (2005). Economic adjustments to groundwater depletion in the high plains: Do water-saving irrigation systems save water? American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 87(1): 147–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shang H, Zhou S, Zhang L (2008). Circular Economy Development Evaluation and Policy Design. Beijing: China Financial & Economic Publishing House

    Google Scholar 

  • Varouchakis E A, Apostolakis A, Siaka M, Vasilopoulos K, Tasiopoulos A (2018). Alternatives for domestic water tariff policy in the municipality of Chania, Greece, toward water saving using game theory. Water Policy, 20(1): 175–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WWAP (United Nations World Water Assessment Programme) (2015). The United Nations World Water Development Report 2015: Water for a Sustainable World. Paris: UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization)

  • Xie G (2015). Modelling decision processes of a green supply chain with regulation on energy saving level. Computers & Operations Research, 54: 266–273

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Xin B, Sun M (2018). A differential oligopoly game for optimal production planning and water savings. European Journal of Operational Research, 269(1): 206–217

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Xu X, He P, Hao X, Zhang Q (2017). Supply chain coordination with green technology under cap-and-trade regulation. International Journal of Production Economics, 183: 433–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu X, Zhang W, He P, Xu X (2017). Production and pricing problems in make-to-order supply chain with cap-and-trade regulation. Omega, 66: 248–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yi Y, Li J (2018). Cost-Sharing contracts for energy saving and emissions reduction of a supply chain under the conditions of government subsidies and a carbon tax. Sustainability, 10(3): 895

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang D, Guo P (2016). Integrated agriculture water management optimization model for water saving potential analysis. Agricultural Water Management, 170: 5–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou L, Xu K, Cheng X, Xu Y, Jia Q (2017). Study on optimizing production scheduling for water-saving in textile dyeing industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 141: 721–727

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Huimin Wang.

Additional information

This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 71603125, 71433003, 91646122, 91746202), China Scholarship Council (Grant No. 201706865020), the National Key R&D Program of China (2017YFC0404600), the Natural Science Research Project of Colleges and Universities in Jiangsu Province (15KJB110012), the Philosophy and Social Science Research Project of Colleges and Universities in Jiangsu Province (2014SJB094), the Humanities and Social Sciences Young Scientist Project of Nanjing Normal University (1409006), the Project funded by China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2014M551623), the Jiangsu Planned Projects for Postdoctoral Research Funds (1301077C), and the Humanity and Social Science Youth foundation of China Ministry of Education (17YJC790002).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, Z., Fang, L. & Wang, H. Internal incentives and operations strategies for the water-saving supply chain with cap-and-trade regulation. Front. Eng. Manag. 6, 87–101 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42524-019-0006-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42524-019-0006-7

Keywords

Navigation