Skip to main content
Log in

A Study on Efficacy of Wavelet Transform for Damage Identification in Reinforced Concrete Buildings

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Vibration Engineering & Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Structural damage and its extent can be detected by vibration-based techniques to avoid failure or to minimize maintenance. Among different damage identification techniques, modal curvature approaches are widely researched and applied one. On the contrary, wavelet transformation (WT) methods are gaining popularity in damage identification of real life buildings because of their suitability for non-stationary signals and non-dependency on baseline data. This paper presents a novel approach utilizing complex continuous wavelet to effectively locate change in physical properties of reinforced concrete (RC) buildings by virtue of variation in frequency and mode shapes due to small change in mass and stiffness.

Methods

In this paper, the effect of variation of mass and stiffness of a building on the modal parameters is established analytically using theequation of motion for a multi-degree freedom system under forced vibration condition. A 3-D finite element model was developed for predicting the modal frequencies and mode shapes of the scaled down six storey RC building and the effect of addition of mass on a particular level of structure on the modal parameters was studied. Further, acceleration time histories were recorded with variation in mass on 3rd story of building using wireless tri-axial accelerometers and the time histories were processed to arrive at Curvature Damage Factor and wavelet coefficients for identification of the additional load on the particular floor.

Results

Vibration responses from all floors of RC building in ambient and loaded conditions were analyzed for frequency response spectra (FRS). Mode shapes were drawn for unloaded case and loaded cases. It was observed that the modal frequency of building decreases with the increase in mass at floors. It is observed that CDF approach could detect the change in mass in both numerical and experimental results. However, CDF algorithm could not detect the addition of load in case 1, 2 and 3, i.e. when load was less than 25 kg, i.e. only 2.6% of floor mass (960 kg). The acquired data for the above stated load cases were analyzed using complex Gaussian ‘cgau5’ wavelet in MATLAB toolbox to determine the singularity in the signal in terms of wavelet coefficient modulus. It is observed that the WT approach is able to precisely locate the change in physical parameters of the RC model building. However, it is seen that additional load could not be detected in case where only 9 kg, i.e. 0.93% of the total floor mass, was placed on 3rd floor.

Conclusions

From the research work, it is observed that CDF technique is inefficient in damage detection and always demand prior baseline information, which is usually difficult to obtain in practice. However, the wavelet transform-based approach more accurately detects the location of change without relying on intact state vibration data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Koohdaragh M, Lotfollahi-Yaghin MA, Ettefagh MM, Mojtehedi A, Beyghbabaye B (2011) Damage detection in beam-like structure based on wavelet packet. Sci Resa Essays 6(7):1537–1545

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rytter A (1993) Vibration based inspection of civil engineering structures. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Building Technology and Structural Engineering, Aalborg University, Denmark, vol R9314, no 44

  3. Cawley P, Adams RD (1979) The location of defects in structures from measurements of natural frequencies. J Strain Anal 14(2):49–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Fan W, Qiao P (2011) Vibration-based damage identification methods: a review and comparative study. Struct Health Monit 10(1):83–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Patel SS, Chourasia AP, Panigrahi SK, Parashar J, Parvez N, Kumar M (2016) Damage identification of RC structures using wavelet transformation. Procedia Eng 144:336–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Amiri GG, Asadi A (2009) Comparison of different methods of wavelet and wavelet packet transform in processing ground motion records. Int J Civil Eng 7(4):248–257

    Google Scholar 

  7. Staszewski WJ, Tomlinson GR (1994) Application of the wavelet transform to fault detection in a spur gear. J Mech Syst Signal Process 8(3):289–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang WJ, McFadden PD (1996) Application of wavelets to gearbox vibration signals for fault detection. J Sound Vib 192(5):927–939

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hou Z, Noori M, Amand RS (2000) Wavelet-based approach for structural damage detection. J Eng Mech 126(7):677–683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mallat S (2001) A wavelet tour of signal processing. Academic Press, San Diego

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Moyo P, Brownjohn JMW (2002) Detection of anomalous structural behavior using wavelet analysis. Mech Syst Signal Process 16(2–3):429–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sun Z, Chang CC (2002) Structural damage assessment based on wavelet packet transform. J Struct Eng 128(10):1354–1361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Amaravadi V, Rao V, Koval LR, Derriso MM (2011) Structural health monitoring using wavelet transforms. In: Proceedings of SPIE, smart structures and materials 2001: smart structures and integrated systems, vol 4327, pp 258–269

  14. Gurley K, Kijewski T, Kareem A (2003) First and higher order correlation detection using wavelet transforms. J Eng Mech 129(2):188–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Jaya Prakash G, Swarnamani S (2008) Damage identification in composite beams using continuous wavelet transform applied to mode shape and strain energy data. Adv Vib Eng 7(2):127–141

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gentile A, Messina A (2003) On the continuous wavelet transforms applied to discrete vibrational data for detecting open cracks in damaged beams. Int J Solids Struct 40:95–315

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Panigrahi SK, Chakraverty S, Mishra BK (2013) Damage assessment in beam with sparse modal information. Adv Vib Eng 12(4):343–348

    Google Scholar 

  18. Melhem H, Kim H (2003) Damage detection in concrete by Fourier and wavelet analyses. J Eng Mech 129(5):571–577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kim H, Melhem H (2004) Damage detection of structures by wavelet analysis. J Eng Struct 26:347–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ovanesova AV, Suarez LE (2004) Applications of wavelet transforms to damage in frame structures. Eng Struct 26:39–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Basu B (2005) Identification of stiffness degradation in structures using wavelet analysis. Constr Build Mater 19:713–721

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Goggins J, Broderick BM, Basu B, Elghazouli AY (2007) Investigation of seismic response of braced frames using wavelet analysis. Struct Control Health Monit 14:627–648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Radzienski M, Krawczuk M (2009) Experimental verification and comparison of mode shape-based damage detection methods. In: 7th International conference on modern practice in stress and vibration analysis. J Phys Conf Ser, vol 181

  24. Asaee ZS, Anvar SA, Sherafat Z (2011) Comparison of modal parameters of multi-story buildings obtained by different wavelet functions. In: Proceedings of IOMAC11-4th international operational modal analysis conference

  25. Miao XY, Wang SL, Fan YJ (2011) Study on damage identification for reinforced concrete structures based on wavelet transform. Appl Mech Mater 94–96:1505–1510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Noh HY, Nair KK, Lignos DG, Kiremidjian AS (2011) Use of wavelet-based damage-sensitive features for structural damage diagnosis using strong motion data. J Struct Eng 137(10):1215–1228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Xue G (2012) Damage detection of reinforced concrete beams by wavelet analysis. Appl Mech Mater 166–169:1416–1421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Chen B, Chen ZW, Wang GJ, Xie WP (2014) Damage detection on sudden stiffness reduction based on discrete wavelet transform. Sci World J 2014:807620. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/807620

    Google Scholar 

  29. Buyukozturk O, Yu T (2003) Structural health monitoring and seismic impact assessment. In: Proceedings of fifth national conference on earthquake engineering, Istanbul, Turkey, 26–30 May 2003

  30. Pandey AK, Biswas M, Samman MM (1991) Damage detection from changes in curvature mode shapes. J Sound Vib 145(2):321–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Wahab MMA, Roeck GD (1999) Damage detection in bridges using modal curvatures: application to a real damage scenario. J Sound Vib 226(2):217–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Harry HG, Gajanan MS (1999) Structural modeling and experimental techniques, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  33. Kanwar VS, Kwatra N, Aggarwal P, Gambir ML (2008) Health monitoring of RCC building model experimentally and its analytical validation. Eng Comput Int J Comput Aided Eng Softw 25(7):677–693

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. K. Panigrahi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Patel, S.S., Chourasia, A., Panigrahi, S.K. et al. A Study on Efficacy of Wavelet Transform for Damage Identification in Reinforced Concrete Buildings. J. Vib. Eng. Technol. 6, 127–138 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42417-018-0023-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42417-018-0023-6

Keywords

Navigation