Seeding Insights and Nourishing Change: a Case for Participatory Evaluation in Place-Based Community Food Systems

Abstract

In the United States, achieving equitable food security requires innovative system-level solutions that address complex intersecting factors. Food insecurity is intricately connected to poverty and access to food, and has short- and long-term impacts on individual health, quality of life, and healthcare costs. Fostering food security demands innovation: new collaborations, approaches, and fresh measurement models that can address food insecurity at a systems level. Through a sophisticated place-based approach, Full Lives is a complex but promising food security community impact grantmaking strategy that leverages the resources of different partners, organizations, and components of the food supply within a concentrated geographical area. Furthermore, transformation of a community’s food system requires a combination of technical knowledge and authentic community engagement in order to effectively yield and measure community change. This case study provides an in-depth look at:

  • How grant makers can work in partnership with a diverse set of non-profit organizations in developing solutions;

  • Co-creation of a community engaged food security program evaluation characterized by shared measurement of community-level indicators;

  • Strengths, challenges and limitations of a community-engaged approach to food security program evaluation.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Data Availability

Not applicable.

Notes

  1. 1.

    Food deserts”: It is important to note that up until 2018, census tracts that were both low-income and low-access (defined as being far from a supermarket, supercenter, or large grocery store) were defined by the USDA Economic Research Service, and often referred to across the field, as “food deserts”. The USDA has since stopped using the term, calling their data tool the “Food Access Research Atlas.” GTCUW supports efforts to move away from the term. Additionally, in its work, GTCUW has found that the negative connotation of the word desert discounts the history, diversity, and complexities of the communities that reside in these areas. In this brief and subsequent materials, GTCUW avoids the term “food deserts” in describing neighborhoods challenged by food insecurity.

References

  1. Amin, S. A., Lehnerd, M., Cash, S. B., Economos, C. D., & Sacheck, J. M. (2018). Three-year case study of national organizations participating in a nutrition cohort: A unique funder-initiated learning collaborative. Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development, 8(2), 123–137. https://doi.org/10.5304/jafscd.2018.082.00.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Artiga, S., & Hinton, E. (2018). Beyond health care: The role of social determinants in promoting health and health equity. http://files.kff.org/attachment/issue-brief-beyond-health-care. Accessed 26 Feb 2020.

  3. Banks, A., Saito, R., & Adamek, M. (2019). Building grantee capacity as a Core strategy to improve local food systems. Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development, 9(A), 253–254. https://doi.org/10.5304/jafscd.2019.091.020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bazerghi, C., McKay, F. H., & Dunn, M. (2016). The role of food banks in addressing food insecurity: A systematic review. Journal of Community Health, 41, 732–740. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-015-0147-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bell, J. & Rubin, V. (2007). Why place matters: Building a movement for healthy communities. PolicyLink & The California Endowment. www.policylink.org/sites/default/files/WHYPLACEMATTERS_FINAL.PDF. Accessed 26 Feb 2020.

  6. Bertmann, F., Ohri-Vachaspati, P., Buman, M. P., & Wharton, C. M. (2012). Implementation of wireless terminals at farmers’ markets: Impact on SNAP redemption and overall sales. American Journal of Public Health, 102(7), e53–e55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Community Food Projects Indicators of Success Fiscal Year 2011 Final Report. (2011). Portland: Community Food Security Coalition.

  8. Community Food Security Coalition. (2009). Whole measures for community food systems: Values-based planning and evaluation. Vermont: Center for Whole Communities.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cureton, C. (2017). West Broadway public market feasibility study. [Unpublished manuscript]. Minneapolis: Appetite for Change and West Broadway Coalition.

  10. Eligon, J. (2016). Minneapolis’s less visible, and more troubled side. The New York Times. www.nytimes.com/2016/01/11/us/minneapolissless-visible-and-more-troubled-side.html. Accessed 26 Feb 2020.

  11. Feeding America. (2017). Understand food security. https://hungerandhealth.feedingamerica.org/understand-food-insecurity. Accessed 26 Feb 2020.

  12. Food Research and Action Center. (2017). The Impact of Poverty, Food Insecurity, and Poor Nutrition on Health and Well-Being. https://frac.org/wp-content/uploads/hunger-health-impact-poverty-food-insecurity-health-well-being.pdf. Accessed 26 Feb 2020.

  13. Greater Twin Cities United Way. (2019). Nourishing communities a case for investing in place-based urban food systems. Congressional Hunger Center. https://www.hungercenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Nourishing-Communities.pdf. Accessed 26 Feb 2020.

  14. Hamm, M. W., & Bellows, A. C. (2003). Community food security and nutrition educators. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 35, 37–43 www.jneb.org/article/S1499-4046(06)60325-4/fulltext.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Harley, D., Stebnicki, M., & Rollins, C. (2000). Applying empowerment evaluation as a tool for self-improvement and community development with culturally diverse populations. Journal of the Community Development Society, 31(2), 348–364. https://doi.org/10.1080/15575330009489711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hendriks, S. (2015). The food security continuum: a novel tool for understanding food insecurity as a range of experiences. Food Security 7, 609–619 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-015-0457-6.

  17. Hood, C. M., Gennuso, K. P., Swain, G. R., & Catlin, B. B. (2016). County health rankings: Relationships between determinant factors and health outcomes. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 50(2), 129–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2015.08.024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Horowitz, B. (2018). Food-system initiatives promote health and wealth in North Minneapolis. Minneapolis Federal Reserve., 102, e53–e55. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2012.300727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kaiser, M. L. (2017). Redefining food security in a community context: An exploration of community food security indicators and social worker roles in community food strategies. Journal of Community Practice, 25, 213–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Leonard, T., Hughes, A. E., Donegan, C., Santillan, A., & Pruitt, S. L. (2018). Overlapping geographic clusters of food security and health: Where do social determinants and health outcomes converge in the US? SSM-Population Health, 5, 160–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Liu, Y., Njai, R. S., Greenlund, K. J., Chapman, D. P., & Croft, J. B. (2014). Relationships between housing and food insecurity, frequent mental distress, and insufficient sleep among adults in US states, 2009. Preventing Chronic Disease, 11, 37. https://doi.org/10.5888/pcd11.130334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Low-income and low-supermarket-access census tracts, 2010–2015. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. www.ers.usda.gov/webdocs/publications/82101/eib-165.pdf?v=0

  23. Minkler, M., Garcia, A., Rubin, V., & Wallerstein N. (2012). Community-based participatory research: a strategy for building healthy communities and promoting health through policy change. http://www.policylink.org/site/apps/nlnet/content2.aspx?c=lkIXLbMNJrE&b=5136581&ct=11762035. Accessed 26 Feb 2020.

  24. Minnesota Food Charter. (2014). www.mnfoodcharter.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/MNFoodCharterSNGLFINAL.pdf. Accessed 26 Feb 2020.

  25. North Minneapolis Neighborhoods. (2019). West Broadway Business and Area Coalition. www.northmpls.org/page/show/769797-neighborhoods. Accessed 26 Feb 2020.

  26. North Minneapolis Workforce Report. (2014). Northside funders group. www.northsidefunders.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/5.3NorthMpls-workforce-Report-June-2014.Pdf.

  27. Patton, M. Q. (2008). Utilization-focused evaluation, 4th edition. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publishing.

  28. Patton, M. Q. (2010). Developmental evaluation: Applying complexity concepts to enhance innovation and use. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publishing.

  29. Raja, S., Ma, C., & Yadav, P. (2008). Beyond food deserts: Measuring and mapping racial disparities in neighborhood food environments. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 27(4), 469–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Rausch, E. & Mattessich, P. (2016). Healthy food access: A view of the landscape in Minnesota and lessons learned from healthy food financing initiatives. The Federal Reserve Bank of Minnesota and Wilder Research. https://www.wilder.org/sites/default/files/imports/Healthy%20Food%20Access%20Study_Final%20Report_April%202016.pdf. Accessed 26 Feb 2020.

  31. Rhone, A., Ploeg, M. V., Dicken, C., Williams, R., & Breneman, V. (2017). Low-income and low-supermarket-access census tracts, 2010-2015, EIB-165, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.

  32. Saadeh, C. I. (2015). Integrating food access, food security, food justice, and food sovereignty paradigms in order to develop an integral food systems theory of change: A North Minneapolis case study. (Master's thesis). Retrieved from ProQuest dissertations and theses database.

  33. Story, M., Kaphingst, K. M., Robinson-O’Brien, R., & Glanz, K. (2008). Creating healthy food and eating environments: Policy and environmental approaches. Annual Review of Public Health, 29, 253–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Swingley, S. (2011). The Northside healthy eating project: Transportation access to affordable health produce. Center for Urban and Regional Affairs, University of Minnesota. http://www.cura.umn.edu/sites/cura.advantagelabs.com/files/publications/NSG-013.pdf. Accessed 26 Feb 2020.

  35. United States Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service. (2017). Food Security and Nutrition Assistance. https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/ag-and-food-statistics-charting-the-essentials/food-security-and-nutrition-assistance/. Accessed 26 Feb 2020.

  36. United States Department of Agriculture Economic Research Services. (n.d.). Food Environment Atlas. https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/food- access-research-atlas/

  37. United States Department of Agriculture. USDA Program in the local food supply chain. (n.d.) U.S. Department of Agriculture Agricultural Marketing Service. www.usda.gov/sites/default/files/documents/FoodSupplyChain_v8.pdf. Accessed 26 Feb 2020.

  38. Wei-ting Chen, M. L. (2015). Community food security in the United States: A survey of the scientific literature volume II. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Center for a Livable Future.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Wolkomir, E. (2018). SNAP boosts retailers and local economies. Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, updated. https://www.cbpp.org/research/food-assistance/snap-boosts-retailers-and-local-economies. Accessed 26 Feb 2020.

  40. World Health Organization, Commission on Social Determinants of Health. (2019). Closing the gap in a generation: Health equity through action on the social determinants of health. http://www.who.int/social_determinants/en. Accessed 26 Feb 2020.

Download references

Acknowledgments

The Full Lives initiative reflects a powerful story about the collective work of many partners working to impact the local food system in North Minneapolis and Twin Cities communities. The strategies and outcomes described in this case article are a result of shared efforts of organizations and stakeholders working to strengthen North Minneapolis’ community food system. GTCUW is deeply appreciative of the collective involvement, contributions, and support of so many partners that made the work of Full Lives possible, including:

General Mills Foundation: Mary Jane Melendez, Nicola Dixon, Louise Iverson, and Meredith Kruger Kos.

Greater Twin Cities United Way: Alyssa Banks, Megan O’Meara, Julie Ogunleye, Ellen Nikodym, Olivia Jefferson, Isabella Xiong, Kiese Hansen, Jaci Donlan, Jennifer Krocak, Anne Soto.

Full Lives Grantees and Partners: Appetite for Change and the Northside Fresh Coalition, CAPI, Northpoint Health and Wellness, Northside Economic Opportunities Network (NEON), Pillsbury United Communities, Project Sweetie Pie, Urban Strategies, Victory Neighborhood Association, West Broadway Business Area Coalition, Youth Resources, Wilder Foundation. Rainbow Research: Rebecca Saito, Misty Blue, Mary McEathron; Terra Soma, LLC: Maggi Adamek, Nadja Berneche; Movement Center for Deep Democracy, Julie Murphy and Associates and so many more of the community partners, businesses and residents that helped to make this work possible.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alyssa Banks.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Banks, A., Saito, R., Berneche, N. et al. Seeding Insights and Nourishing Change: a Case for Participatory Evaluation in Place-Based Community Food Systems. Int. Journal of Com. WB (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42413-020-00097-0

Download citation

Keywords

  • Place-based
  • Community indicators
  • Participatory evaluation
  • Community food systems
  • Food security
  • Food justice