Skip to main content
Log in

The Inverse Optimal Control Problem for a Three-Loop Missile Autopilot

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Aeronautical and Space Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The performance characteristics of the autopilot must have a fast response to intercept a maneuvering target and reasonable robustness for system stability under the effect of un-modeled dynamics and noise. By the conventional approach, the three-loop autopilot design is handled by time constant, damping factor and open-loop crossover frequency to achieve the desired performance requirements. Note that the general optimal theory can be also used to obtain the same gain as obtained from the conventional approach. The key idea of using optimal control technique for feedback gain design revolves around appropriate selection and interpretation of the performance index for which the control is optimal. This paper derives an explicit expression, which relates the weight parameters appearing in the quadratic performance index to the design parameters such as open-loop crossover frequency, phase margin, damping factor, or time constant, etc. Since all set of selection of design parameters do not guarantee existence of optimal control law, explicit inequalities, which are named the optimality criteria for the three-loop autopilot (OC3L), are derived to find out all set of design parameters for which the control law is optimal. Finally, based on OC3L, an efficient gain selection procedure is developed, where time constant is set to design objective and open-loop crossover frequency and phase margin as design constraints. The effectiveness of the proposed technique is illustrated through numerical simulations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abd-elatif MA, Qian L, Bo Y (2016) Optimization of three-loop missile autopilot gain under crossover frequency constraint. Def Technol 12:32–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Mracek CP, Ridgely DB (Aug. 2005) Missile longitudinal autopilots: connections between optimal control and classical topologies. AIAA guidance, navigation, and control conference, San Francisco

  3. Mracek CP, Ridgely DB (Aug. 2005) Missile longitudinal autopilots: comparison of multiple three loop topologies. AIAA guidance, navigation, and control conference, San Francisco

  4. Nesline FW, Zarchan P (1984) Why modern controllers can go unstable in practice. AIAA guidance, navigation, and control conference, pp 495–500

  5. Jackson PB (2010) Overview of missile flight control systems. Johns Hopkins APL Tech., pp 9–24

  6. De-fu L, Jun-fang F, Zaikang Q, Yu M (2009) Analysis and improvement of missile three-loop autopilots. J Syst Eng Electron 20:844–851

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hui W, Defu L, Jiaxin W, Tao S (2012) An analytical design method for the missile two-loop acceleration autopilot. System simulation and scientific computing, Heidelberg, pp 157–165

  8. Fan J, Su Z, Li Q, Dong S (2011) Design and control limitation analysis of two-loop autopilot. IEEE Chinese control and decision conference, China, pp 3814–3818

  9. Lidan X, Kenan Z, Wanchun C, Xingliang Y (2010) Optimal control and output feedback considerations for missile with blended aero-fin and lateral impulsive thrust. Chin J Aeronaut 23:401–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sreenuch T, Tsourdos A, Hughes E, White B (2004) Lateral acceleration control design of a non-linear homing missile using multi-objective evolution strategies. American control conference, vol 4, Boston, pp 3628–3633

  11. Moon BM, Sang DK, Tahk MJ (2007) Missile autopilot design via output redefinition and gain optimization technique. SICE 2007 annual conference, Takamatsu, pp 2615–2619

  12. Kalman RE (1963) When is a linear control system optimal? Proceedings of joint automatic control conference, Minneapolis, pp 1–15

  13. Anderson BDO (1966) The inverse problem of optimal control, Rep. Sel-66-39. Stanford Electronics Laboratories, California

  14. Chang SSL (1961) Synthesis of optimum control systems. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  15. Anderson BDO, Moore JB (1971) Linear optimal control. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Zarchan P (2002) Tactical and strategic missile guidance, 4th edn, AIAA, vol 199. Progress in astronautics and aeronautics, Reston

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Min-Jea Tahk.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hwang, D., Tahk, MJ. The Inverse Optimal Control Problem for a Three-Loop Missile Autopilot. Int. J. Aeronaut. Space Sci. 19, 411–422 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42405-018-0014-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42405-018-0014-6

Keywords

Navigation