Advertisement

Waypoints Following Guidance for Surface-to-Surface Missiles

  • Hao Zhou
  • Elsayed M. Khalil
  • Tawfiqur Rahman
  • Wanchun Chen
Original Paper
  • 6 Downloads

Abstract

The paper proposes waypoints following guidance law. In this method an optimal trajectory is first generated which is then represented through a set of waypoints that are distributed from the starting point up to the final target point using a polynomial. The guidance system then works by issuing guidance command needed to move from one waypoint to the next one. Here the method is applied for a surface-to-surface missile. The results show that the method is feasible for on-board application.

Keywords

Missile guidance Inverse dynamic guidance Surface-to-surface missile Waypoints following guidance 

References

  1. 1.
    Sworder DD, Wells GR (1977) Guidance laws for aerodynamically controlled re-entry vehicles. J Spacecr 14(2):7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Liu Xj, Yuan Tb (2005) A new efficient method to boundary value problem for ballistic rocket guidance. Appl Math Mech 26(10):1375–1381CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kumar SR, Rao S, Ghose D (2014) Nonsingular terminal sliding mode guidance with impact angle constraints. J Guid Control Dyn 37(4):1114–1130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Medagoda EDB, Gibbens PW (2010) Synthetic-waypoint guidance algorithm for following a desired flight trajectory. J Guid Control Dyn 33(2):601–606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kumar P, Bhattacharya A, Padhi R (2013) MPSP guidance of tactical surface-to-surface missiles with way-point as well as terminal impact and body angle constraints. In: Presented at the 2013 IEEE International Conference on Control Applications (CCA) 28–30. August, Hyderabad, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ashwin D, Debasish G (2012) Impact angle constraint guidance law using cubic splines for intercepting stationary targets. In: AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, Minneapolis, Minnesota. 13–16 AugustGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Knott GD (2000) Interpolating cubic splines. Publ Am Stat Assoc 97(457):366–366zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sentoh E, Bryson AE (1992) Inverse and optimal control for desired outputs. J Guid Control Dyn 15(3):687–691CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Enns D, Bugajski DAN, Hendrick R, Stein G (1994) Dynamic inversion: an evolving methodology for flight control design. Int J Control 59(1):71–91CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mario I, Gianluca C, Francesco N (1998) Angle of attack guidance via robust approximate inversion. In: Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibit, Boston, USA, MAGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lu L, Murray-Smith DJ, Thomson D (2008) Issues of numerical accuracy and stability in inverse simulation. Simul Model Pract Theory 16(9):1350–1364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zhou H, Rahman T, Chen W (2014) Neural network assisted inverse dynamic guidance for terminally constrained entry flight. Sci World J 686040:2014Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tawfiqur R, Zhou H, Liang Y, Chen W (2015) Pseudospectral model predictive control for exo-atmospheric guidance. Int J Aeronaut Space Sci 16(1):64–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Burden RL, Faires JD (2011) Numerical analysis. Brooks Cole Publishing CompanyGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Palumbo NF, Blauwkamp RA, Lloyd JM (2010) Modern homing missile guidance theory and techniques. Johns Hopkins APL Tech Dig 29(1):42–59Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Oberkampf WL, DeLand SM, Rutherford BM, Diegert KV, Alvin KF (2002) Error and uncertainty in modeling and simulation. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 75(1):333–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    The Aerodynamic Challenges of the Design and Development of the Space Shuttle Orbiter [A]. In: Space Shuttle Technical Conference [C]. Young JC, Underwood JM, Hillje ER, George W, Deloy O (eds) NASA CP-2342, Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center, Houston, Texas, 1983Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Korean Society for Aeronautical & Space Sciences and Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hao Zhou
    • 1
  • Elsayed M. Khalil
    • 1
  • Tawfiqur Rahman
    • 2
  • Wanchun Chen
    • 1
  1. 1.School of AstronauticsBeihang University (BUAA)BeijingChina
  2. 2.Directorate of EngineeringBangladesh Air ForceDhakaBangladesh

Personalised recommendations