Advertisement

Impact Angle and Time Control Guidance Under Field-of-View Constraints and Maneuver Limits

  • Sang-Wook Shim
  • Seong-Min Hong
  • Gun-Hee Moon
  • Min-Jea Tahk
Original Paper
  • 98 Downloads

Abstract

This paper proposes a guidance law which considers the constraints of seeker field-of-view (FOV) as well as the requirements on impact angle and time. The proposed guidance law is designed for a constant speed missile against a stationary target. The guidance law consists of two terms of acceleration commands. The first one is to achieve zero-miss distance and the desired impact angle, while the second is to meet the desired impact time. To consider the limits of FOV and lateral maneuver capability, a varying-gain approach is applied on the second term. Reduction of realizable impact times due to these limits is then analyzed by finding the longest course among the feasible ones. The performance of the proposed guidance law is demonstrated by numerical simulation for various engagement conditions.

Keywords

Impact-time control guidance Impact-angle control guidance Field-of-view constraints Maneuver limits Homing missile guidance 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work has been supported by Agency for Defense Development (ADD) and Defense Acquisition Program Administration (DAPA) under Grant 07-201-301-004.

References

  1. 1.
    Xing M, Balakrishnan SN, Ohlmeyer EJ (2006) Guidance law design form missiles with reduced seeker field-of-view. In: Proceedings of the AIAA guidance, navigation, and control conference, Keyston, Colorado, August 21–24.  https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2006-6085
  2. 2.
    Sang DK, Tahk MJ (2009) Guidance law switching logic considering the seeker’s field-of-view limits. J Proc Inst Mech Eng Part G J Aerosp Eng 223(8):1049–1058.  https://doi.org/10.1243/09544100JAERO614 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Park BG, Jeon BJ, Kim TH, Tahk MJ, Kim YH (2012) Composite guidance law for impact angle control of tactical missiles with passive seekers. In: Asia-Pacific international symposium on aerospace technology, Jeju, Korea, November 13–15Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ratnoo A (2016) Analysis of two-stage proportional navigation with heading constraints. J Guid Control Dyn 39(1):156–164.  https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G001262 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kim TH, Park BG, Tahk MJ (2013) Bias-shaping method for biased proportional navigation with terminal-angle constraint. J Guid Control Dyn 36(6):1810–1816.  https://doi.org/10.2514/1.59252 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tekin R, Erer KS (2015) Switched-gain guidance for impact angle control under physical constraints. J Guid Control Dyn 38(2):205–216.  https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G000766 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Erer KS, Tekin R, Özgören MK (2015) Look angle constraint impact angle control based on proportional navigation. In: AIAA guidance, navigation, and control conference, AIAA SciTech Forum (AIAA 2015-0091).  https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2015-0091
  8. 8.
    Park BG, Kim TH, Tahk MJ (2013) Optimal impact angle control guidance law considering the seeker’s field-of-view limits. J Proc Inst Mech Eng Part G J Aerosp Eng 227(8):1347–1364.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0954410012452367 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Park BG, Kim TH, Tahk MJ (2016) Range-to-Go weighted optimal guidance with impact angle constraint and seeker’s look angle limits. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst 52(3):1241–1256.  https://doi.org/10.1109/TAES.2016.150415 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wen Q, Xia Q, Weixia S (2015) A parameter design strategy for seeker’s field-of-view constraint in impact angle guidance. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part G J Aerosp Eng 229(13):2389–2396.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0954410015576237 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wang X, Zhang Y, Wu H (2016) Sliding mode control based impact angle control guidance considering the seekerxs field-of-view constraint. ISA Trans 61:49–59.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isatra.2015.12.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tahk MJ, Shim SW, Hong SM, Lee CH, Choi HL Impact time control based on time-to-go prediction for sea-skimming anti-ship missiles. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst (submitted for publication)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ryoo CK, Cho H, Tahk MJ (2005) Optimal guidance laws with terminal impact angle constraint. J Guid Control Dyn 28(4):724–732.  https://doi.org/10.2514/1.8392 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dubins LE (1957) On curves of minimal length with a constraint on average curvature, and with prescribed initial and terminal positions and tangents. Am J Math 79(3):497–516.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2372560 MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Korean Society for Aeronautical & Space Sciences and Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sang-Wook Shim
    • 1
  • Seong-Min Hong
    • 1
  • Gun-Hee Moon
    • 1
  • Min-Jea Tahk
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Aerospace EngineeringKorea Advanced Institute of Science and TechnologyDaejeonRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations