Skip to main content
Log in

Reynolds number influence on the backpressure-induced shock–boundary layer interaction in an asymmetric supersonic expansion flow

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Aerospace Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the present study, asymmetric supersonic expansion flow produced by an annular conical supersonic nozzle has been studied under static conditions. To understand the details of Reynolds number influence on the backpressure-induced shock–boundary layer interaction, a computational program has been carried out. Particular attention has been paid to the shock physics and characteristics of shock–shock and shock–boundary layer interaction change in the flow field when applied to engines operating in different ambient pressure environments. The identification of this Reynolds number correlated flow behavior changes is important for low supersonic expansion flow in engines, as it is directly attributed to the limits of off-design capability on launcher performance. The obtained results show that Reynolds number has significant influence on flow pattern at low pressure ratio, PR, conditions. When PR grows from 2.00 to 2.10, the most prominent phenomenon is that the separation point on the upper wall keeps moving downstream while the one on the lower wall keeps still. This special flow pattern results in a gradual transition from a Mach reflection to the regular reflection. However, for results at higher pressure ratios than 2.57, the comparison between the predicted shock patterns at the three ambient conditions shows a close one for these higher PR regimes. This suggests that the Reynolds number effect is going to weaken at a higher Mach number flow regime when the flow Reynolds number increases with an increase of the pressure ratio as well as the expansion flow Mach number.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rommel T, Hagemann G, Schley CA et al (1997) Plug nozzle flowfield analysis. J Propul Power 13:629–634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hagemann G, Immich H, Terhadt M. Flow phenomenon in advanced rocket nozzles-the plug nozzle. In: 34th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE joint propulsion conference and exhibit, AIAA Paper 1998-3522. Cleveland, OH, USA

  3. Verma SB. Performance characteristics of an annular conical aerospike nozzle with freestream effect. In: 44th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE joint propulsion conference & exhibit, AIAA Paper 2008-5290. Hartford, CT

  4. Schwane R, Hagemann G, Reijasse P. Plug nozzles-assessment of prediction methods for flow features and engine performance. In: 40th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting & exhibit, AIAA Paper 2002-0585. Reno, NV, USA

  5. Onofri M, Calabro M, Hagemann G, Immich H, Sacher P, Nasuti F, Reijasse P. Plug nozzles: summary of flow features and engine performance - overview of RTO/AVT WG 10 subgroup 1. In: 40th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting & exhibit, AIAA Paper 2002-0584. Reno, NV, USA

  6. Nasuti F, Onofri M, Martelli E (2005) Role of wall shape on the transition in axisymmetric dual-bell nozzles. J Propul Power 21(2):243–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Martelli E, Nasuti F, Onofri M (2007) Numerical parametric analysis of dual bell nozzle flows. AIAA J 45(3):640–650

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Miyazawa M, Otsu H. An analytical study on design and performance of dual-bell nozzles. In: 42nd AIAA aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit, AIAA Paper 2004-380. Reno, Nevada

  9. Verma SB, Stark R, Génin C, Haidn O (2010) Flow separation characteristics of a dual-bell nozzle during its transition modes. Shock Waves 20(3):191–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Verma SB, Stark R, Génin C, Haidn O (2011) Cold gas dual-bell transition tests in a high altitude simulation chamber. Shock Waves 21(2):131–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Stark R, Wagner B (2009) Experimental study of boundary layer separation in truncated ideal contour nozzles. Shock Waves 19(3):185–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Verma SB, Haidn O (2011) Cold gas testing of thrust-optimized parabolic nozzle in a high-altitude test facility. J Propul Power 27(6):1238–1246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Verma SB, Stark R, Haidn O (2013) Reynolds number influence on dual-bell transition phenomena. J Propul Power 29(3):602–609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Olson BJ, Lele SK (2013) A mechanism for unsteady separation in over-expanded nozzle flow. Phys Fluids 25:110809

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zaman K, Dahl M, Bencic T, Loh C (2002) Investigation of a ‘transonic resonance’ with convergent-divergent nozzles. J Fluid Mech 463:313–343

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Verma SB, Manisankar C (2014) Origin of flow asymmetry in planar nozzles with separation. Shock Waves 24:191–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Donaldson C, Lange RH (1952) Study of pressure rise across shock waves required to separate laminar and turbulent boundary layers, NACA RM L52C21

  18. Keanini RG, Brown AM (2007) Scale analysis and experimental observations of shock-induced turbulent boundary layer separation in nozzles. Eur J Mech B Fluids 26:494–510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Menter FR, Kuntz M, Langtry R (2003) Ten years of industrial experience with the SST turbulence model. In: Harjalic K, Nagano Y, Tummers M (eds) Turbulence, Heat, and mass transfer, 2003. Proceedings of the 4th international symposium on turbulence, heat, and mass transfer, 2003, International centre for heat and mass transfer, Ankara, Turkey. Begell House, Inc., 2003, pp 625–632

  20. Miaosheng He, Lizi Qin, Liu Yu (2015) Numerical investigation of flow separation behavior in an over-expanded annular conical aerospike nozzle. Chin J Aeronaut 28(4):983–1002

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We wish to acknowledge the support of the NSFC Project (91441205). Besides, the authors would like to thank the Center for High Performance Computing of SJTU for providing the supercomputer π to support this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Miaosheng He.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ji, Y., He, M. & Liu, H. Reynolds number influence on the backpressure-induced shock–boundary layer interaction in an asymmetric supersonic expansion flow. AS 2, 111–118 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42401-019-00025-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42401-019-00025-x

Keywords

Navigation