Skip to main content
Log in

OPD analysis and prediction in aero-optics based on dictionary learning

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Aerospace Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

When aircraft flying at a high speed, the density and reflective index of atmosphere around it become uneven. Thus images or videos observed from the observation window on the aircraft are usually blur or quivering, which is called the aero-optical effect. To recover the images from poor quality, it is necessary to learn about the wavefront distortion of the light, described as optical path difference (OPD). Among the existing methods, the method of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation followed by ray tracing is very time consuming, and the method of real-time OPD measurement with OPD sensor has a certain lag for OPD with high frequency. In this paper, a reconstructible dimension reduction method based on dictionary learning is employed to map the high-dimensional OPD data into a low-dimensional space, and the OPD data are calculated when rays travel across the supersonic shear layer. All the parameters of training and test datasets remain the same except the convective Mach numbers (Mc number). According to the dimension reduction results of training sets, we find that OPD is obviously periodic and its distribution characteristics have a strong correlation with Mc number. By fitting the OPD data in the low-dimensional space, every point on the fitting curve can be reconstructed to the original high-dimensional space, which works as prediction. Compared with the truthful data, the average similarity coefficient of the prediction for the test datasets is up to 83%, which means that the prediction result is credible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gilbert KG, Otten LJ (1982) Aero-optical phenomena. AIAA, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Burns WR, Jumper EJ, Gordeyev S (2016) A robust modification of a predictive adaptive-optic control method for aero-optics. In: 47th AIAA plasmadynamics and lasers conference, p 3529

  3. Whiteley M, Gibson J (2007) Adaptive laser compensation for aero-optics and atmospheric disturbances. In: 38th AIAA plasmadynamics and lasers conference in conjunction with the 16th international conference on MHD energy conversion, p 4012

  4. Goorskey DJ, Schmidt JD, Whiteley MR (2013) Efficacy of predictive wavefront control for compensating aero-optical aberrations. Opt Eng 52(7):071418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Tesch J, Gibson S, Verhaegen M (2013) Receding-horizon adaptive control of aero-optical wavefronts. Opt Eng 52(7):071406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Page KA (2005) Applications of linear predictors in adaptive optics, p 1511

  7. Doerr SE, Wissler JB, McMackin LJ, Truman CR (1993) Aero-optics research at the Phillips laboratory. Opt Diagn Fluid Thermal Flow Int Soc Opt Photon 2005:129–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hong HY, Zhang TX (2004) Investigation of restoration algorithm for degraded images caused by aero-optics effects using multi-resolution blind deconvolution. Chin J Comput Chin Edn 27(7):952–963

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cowley JM (1979) Principles of image formation. Introduction to analytical electron microscopy. Springer, Boston, pp 1–42

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. Hecht E, Zajac A (1987) Optics, 2nd edn. Addison-Wesley, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  11. Klimaszewski K, Sederberg TW (1997) Faster ray tracing using adaptive grids. IEEE Comput Graph Appl 17(1):42–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wu L, Fang J, Yang Z, Wu S (2011) Study on a neural network model for high speed turbulent boundary layer inducing optical distortions. Optik Int J Light Electron Opt 122(17):1572–1575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Van Der Maaten L, Postma E, Van Den Herik J (2009) Dimensionality reduction: a comparative. J Mach Learn Res 10:66–71

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wei X, Kleinsteuber M, Shen H (2015) Invertible nonlinear dimensionality reduction via joint dictionary learning. In: International conference on latent variable analysis and signal separation. Springer, Cham, pp 279–286

  15. Donoho DL (2006) Compressed sensing. IEEE Trans Inf Theory 52(4):1289–1306

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Jumper EJ, Fitzgerald EJ (2001) Recent advances in aero-optics. Prog Aerosp Sci 37(3):299–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gladstone JH, Dale TP (1863) XIV. Researches on the refraction, dispersion, and sensitiveness of liquids. Philos Trans R Soc Lond 153:317–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Zheng SL, LI YX, Wei X, Peng XS (2016) Nonlinear dimensionality reduction based on dictionary learning. Acta Autom Sin 42(7):1065–1076

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported in part by The Technical Innovation Project of Aerospace Advanced Technology Joint Research Center (Project No: USCAST2016-6).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuanxiang Li.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, Z., Li, Y., Xing, B. et al. OPD analysis and prediction in aero-optics based on dictionary learning. AS 2, 61–70 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42401-018-0020-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42401-018-0020-1

Keywords

Navigation