Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

An Overview of Cervical Spine Posture Assessment Methods

  • Review
  • Published:
SN Comprehensive Clinical Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Assessment of posture is not an easy task, but it is an integral part of physical evaluation and designing a treatment protocol. Various postural measurement methods have been developed and their validity and reliability have been established. This review provides an overview of all the methods and critically analyses them. To give a comprehensive review of all the available methods that are used to assess cervical spine posture and briefly compare their reliability, validity, advantages, and disadvantages. A thorough search was performed on PubMed/Medline, Scopus, ScienceDirect, and Web of Science. Studies assessing cervical spine posture, irrespective of the age of the participants and the device being used in the study were included. Any study including participants with pain, or any other pathology was excluded. Data from included studies was collated and compared to conduct the study. After refining the search strategy, studies indicated various methods used in clinics and/or academics such as visual assessment method, radiographs, photogrammetry, plumb line method, simple observation method, and devices such as inclinometer, flexicurve, and electronic head posture instrument. All the included studies were analysed to determine the method most preferred by the clinicians. It was observed that the choice of method to be used for the cervical posture assessment depends on various factors such as the preference of the clinician, patient population, and ease of use. The non-invasive methods provided immediate results and hence were favored. The most preferred method among the clinicians was the visual assessment method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

All data generated or analysed during this study is included in the reference list.

Code Availability

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

MRI :

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

FC :

Flexicurve

EHPI :

Electronic Head Posture Instrument

HPSCI :

Head Posture Spinal Curvature Instrument

MHPSCI :

Modified Head Posture Spinal Curvature Instrument

CROM :

Cervical Range of Motion

CVA :

Craniovertebral Angle

References

  1. de Albuquerque PMNM, de Alencar GG, de Oliveira DA, de Siqueira GR. Concordance and reliability of photogrammetric protocols for measuring the cervical lordosis angle: a systematic review of the literature. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2018;41(1):71–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmpt.2017.08.004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Shaghayeghfard B, Ahmadi A, Maroufi N, Sarrafzadeh J. Evaluation of forward head posture in sitting and standing positions. Euro Spine J. 2016;25(11):3577–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-4254-x.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Passier LN, Nasciemento MP, Gesch JM, Haines TP. Physiotherapist observation of head and neck alignment. Physiother Theory Pract. 2010;26(6):416–23. https://doi.org/10.3109/09593980903317557.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fedorak C, Ashworth N, Marshall J, Paull H. Reliability of the visual assessment of cervical and lumbar lordosis: How good are we? Spine. 2003;28(16):1857–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.BRS.0000083281.48923.BD.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gadotti IC, Armijo-Olivo S, Silveira A, Magee D. Reliability of the craniocervical posture assessment: Visual and angular measurements using photographs and radiographs. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2013;36(9):619–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmpt.2013.09.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Aitken, A. Reliability of Visual Assessment of Forward Head Posture in Standing. 2008; 1–82.

  7. Hazar Z, Karabicak GO, Tiftikci U. Reliability of photographic posture analysis of adolescents. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015;27(10):3123–6. https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.27.3123.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Paušić J, Pedišić Ž, Dizdar D. Reliability of a photographic method for assessing standing posture of elementary school students. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2010;33(6):425–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmpt.2010.06.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Salahzadeh Z, Maroufi N, Ahmadi A, Behtash H, Razmjoo A, Gohari M, Parnianpour M. Assessment of forward head posture in females: Observational and photogrammetry methods. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2014;27(2):131–9. https://doi.org/10.3233/BMR-130426.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ruivo RM, Pezarat-Correia P, Carita AI. Intrarater and interrater reliability of photographic measurement of upper-body standing posture of adolescents. Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics. 2015;38(1):74–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmpt.2014.10.009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Raupp EG, Candotti CT, Marchetti BV, Vieira A, Medeiros FS, Loss JF. The Validity and Reproducibility of the Flexicurve in the Evaluation of Cervical Spine Lordosis. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2017;40(7):501–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmpt.2017.06.010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lau HMC, Chiu TTW, Lam TH. Measurement of craniovertebral angle with electronic head posture instrument: Criterion validity. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2010;47(9):911–8. https://doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2010.01.0001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Cheung Lau HM, Wing Chiu TT, Lam TH. Clinical measurement of craniovertebral angle by electronic head posture instrument: A test of reliability and validity. Man Ther. 2009;14(4):363–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.math.2008.05.004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Subbarayalu AV. Measurement of craniovertebral angle by the Modified Head Posture Spinal Curvature Instrument: A reliability and validity study. Physiother Theory Pract. 2016;32(2):144–52. https://doi.org/10.3109/09593985.2015.1099172.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hickey ER, Rondeau MJ, Corrente JR, Abysalh J, Seymour CJ. Reliability of the Cervical Range of Motion (CROM) device and plumb-line techniques in measuring resting head posture (RHP). J Manual Manipulative Ther. 2000;8(1):10–7. https://doi.org/10.1179/106698100790811346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Audette I, Dumas JP, Côté JN, De Serres SJ. Validity and between-day reliability of the cervical range of motion (CROM) device. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2010;40(5):318–23. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2010.3180.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Harrison DE, Haas JW, Cailliet R, Harrison DD, Holland B, Janik TJ. Concurrent validity of flexicurve instrument measurements: Sagittal skin contour of the cervical spine compared with lateral cervical radiographic measurements. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2005;28(8):597–603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmpt.2005.08.012.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. McFarland C, Wang-Price S, Richard S. Clinical measurements of cervical lordosis using flexirule and inclinometer methods in individuals with and without cervical spine dysfunction: A reliability and validity study. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2015;28(2):295–302. https://doi.org/10.3233/BMR-140517.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Karabag H, Iplikcioglu AC. The Assessment of Upright Cervical Spinal Alignment Using Supine MRI Studies. Clin Spine Surg. 2017;30(7):E892–5. https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000000495.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Oshina M, Tanaka M, Oshima Y, Tanaka S, Riew KD. Correlation and differences in cervical sagittal alignment parameters between cervical radiographs and magnetic resonance images. Eur Spine J. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-018-5550-z.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Tang R, Ye IB, Cheung ZB, Kim JS, Cho SKW. Age-related Changes in Cervical Sagittal Alignment: A Radiographic Analysis. Spine. 2019;44(19):E1144–50. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000003082.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Furlanetto TS, Sedrez JA, Candotti CT, Loss JF. Photogrammetry as a tool for the postural evaluation of the spine: A systematic review. World J Orthopaed. 2016;7(2):136–48. https://doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v7.i2.136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Gadotti IC, Magee D. Validity of surface markers placement on the cervical spine for craniocervical posture assessment. Man Ther. 2013;18(3):243–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.math.2012.10.012.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Guan X, Fan G, Wu X, Zeng Y, Su H, Gu G, Zhou Q, Gu X, Zhang H, He S. Photographic measurement of head and cervical posture when viewing mobile phone: a pilot study. Eur Spine J. 2015;24(12):2892–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-4143-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Wilmarth, M., & Hilliard, T. Measuring head posture via the craniovertebral angle. 2002

  26. Kendall, F., McCreary, E., Provance, P., & Rodgers, M. Muscles, testing and function: with posture and pain. 1993

  27. Hinman RS, May RL, Crossley KM. Is there an alternative to the full-leg radiograph for determining knee joint alignment in osteoarthritis? Arthritis Care Res. 2006;55(2):306–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.21836.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Schwab FJ, Smith VA, Biserni M, Gamez L, Farcy JP, Pagala M. Adult scoliosis: a quantitative radiographic and clinical analysis. Spine. 2002;27(4):387–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Sciences, Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi, 110025, India

    Arshi Shamim, Tarushi Tanwar & Zubia Veqar

Authors
  1. Arshi Shamim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tarushi Tanwar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Zubia Veqar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceived and designed the manuscript: AS, TT, ZV. Wrote the paper: AS, TT. Critically reviewed the manuscript: AS, TT, ZV. All authors met the ICMJE criteria for authorship and approved the final version of the submitted manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zubia Veqar.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

No conflicts of interest were reported for the current study.

Consent to Participate

Not applicable.

Consent for Publication

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Imaging

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shamim, A., Tanwar, T. & Veqar, Z. An Overview of Cervical Spine Posture Assessment Methods. SN Compr. Clin. Med. 5, 225 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42399-023-01559-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42399-023-01559-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation