Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Assessment of Bone Marrow Status in Different Hematological Diseases Using Diffusion Weighted Image (DWI)– and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC)–MRI Technique

  • Medicine
  • Published:
SN Comprehensive Clinical Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Assessing the value of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in normal bone marrow (BM) tissue as well as in benign and malignant hematological diseases in comparison with BM histopathologic report. A cohort cross-sectional study performed from October 2016 till December 2017 in Al-Imamian Al-Khadimain Medical City. Forty patients were enrolled and segregated equally into two main groups (benign and malignant hematological disorders with another 20 healthy volunteers (control group). Hematology data were recorded for all patients in addition to DWI-MRI and ADC mapping in comparison with bone marrow report for the group of malignant hematological disease in terms of blast cell percentage. Conventional MRI reveals abnormal signal intensity in 85% of the malignant cases with different pattern. While 95% of the benign and 100% of control group had normal signal intensity with P value (P = 0.001). Application of DWI-ADC on three groups of sample reveals a variable range of ADC values which is higher in malignant (225–875 × 10−6 mm2\s) than benign (275–600 × 10−6 mm2\s) and control cases (205–560 × 10−6 mm2\s) with a cut-off value of 550 × 10−6 mm2\s. There was a positive correlation between ADC values and blast % in bone marrow histopathological report with correlation coefficient of 0.75 and P value of 0.05. Both DWI-MRI and ADC are useful in BM assessment. The latter is a quantitative assay for the diffusion and can reflect a functional assessment in correlation with blast cell percentage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. George M, Lehman CM. Disorders of hemostasis and coagulation. In: Greer JP, editor. Wintrob s clinical hematology. 13th ed. Philadelphia: LWW publishers; 2017. p. 128–32.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kanshansky K. Hematopoitic stem cells. In: Kanshansky K, editor. Williams hematology. 9th ed. New York: McGraw Hill education; 2015. p. 257–9.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Custer RP, Ahlfeldt FE. Studies on the structure and function of the bone marrow. J Lab Clin Med. 2007;17:951.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Naveires O, Nardi V, Wenzel PL. Bone-marrow adipocytes as negative regulators of the haematopoietic microenvironment. Nature. 2009;460:259–63. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08099.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. List AF, Paraskevas F. Examination of the the blood and bone marrow. In: Greer JP, editor. Wintrob s clinical hematology. 13th ed. Philadelphia: LWW publishers; 2017. p. 25.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Brian M. Dale, Mark A. Brown. Production of net magnetization. In: Brian M. Dale,editor. MRI basic principles and application, 5th ed. Oxford: Wiley blackwell; 2015. p. 1.

  7. Achten E, Boon P, Van De Kerckhove T, Caemaert J, De Reuek J, Kunnen M, et al. Value of single-voxel proton MR spectroscopy in temporal lobe epilepsy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1997;18:1131–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Nolen-Hoeksema S. MRI applications. In: Nolen H, editor. Abnormal psychology. 6th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Education; 2014. p. 67.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Robert M. Appropriateness criteria for cardiac computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Radiol. 2006;10:751.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Moulopoules. Radiological imaging in hematological malignancies. JMRI. 1993;2:14–6.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Le B, Breton E. Imagerie de diffusion in-vivo par résonance magnétique nucléaire. C R Acad Sci. 1985;15:1109–12.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Knipe H. MRI basics. JMRI. 2017;19:467–9.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Schmidt G. Whole body DWI in malignancies. EJR. 2005;55:33–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Pangalis GA. Downstaging of lymphocytic leukemia patients. Haemotologica. 2002;87:500–6.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Vora AJ, Lilleyman JS. Secondary thrombocytosis. Harmotologica. 1993;8:88–90.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Palis J, Yoder MC. Yolk-sac hematopoiesis: the first blood cells of mouse and man. Exp Hematol. 2001;8:927–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-472X(01)00669-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Jacobs MA, Pan L, Macura KJ. Whole-body diffusion weighted and proton imaging: a review of this emerging technology for monitoring metastatic cancer. Semin Roentgenol. 2009;44(2):111–22. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ro.2009.01.003.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Catler R. Pictorial review of musckloskeletal system. Turk Soc Radiol. 2013;14:393–5.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Nonomura Y, Yasumoto M, Yoshimura R, Haraguchi K, Ito S, Akashi T, et al. Relationship between bone marrow cellularity and apparent diffusion coefficient. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2001;13(5):757–60. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.1105.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Waseem F. AlTameemi.

Ethics declarations

It is approved by IRB (Institute Review Board) al Nahrain University/College of Medicine, and all patients were informed about the study by taking a verbal consent.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Research Involving Human Participants

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards, as well as IRB (institute review board) al Nahrain university/college of medicine, and all patients were informed about the study by taking a verbal consent.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Medicine

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

AlTameemi, W.F., Khassaf, M.S., Wazeer, F.J. et al. Assessment of Bone Marrow Status in Different Hematological Diseases Using Diffusion Weighted Image (DWI)– and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC)–MRI Technique. SN Compr. Clin. Med. 1, 458–464 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42399-019-00067-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42399-019-00067-4

Keywords

Navigation