Abstract
Peer bullying in schools is a significant public health problem that contributes to poor health and wellbeing outcomes for those who bully or are bullied. Meta-analyses of the efficacy of secondary school bullying prevention interventions have typically found no effects or an increase in student bullying. Consequently, few secondary school studies have examined the “real-world” effectiveness of these interventions. This age-cohort study design evaluated the effectiveness of the Friendly Schools (FS) secondary school intervention, previously found to be efficacious. FS was implemented in schools under real-world conditions by an education publisher. Student survey data were collected in 12 schools. The primary outcomes were bullying victimisation and perpetration. Results showed a significant decrease in reported bullying perpetration in subsequent cohorts of both grade 8 and 9 students, and a significant reduction in bullying victimisation and cybervictimisation for grade 8 students, when the FS student curriculum was taught compared to the usual curriculum. This study demonstrates the importance of considering the effectiveness of secondary school bullying prevention interventions and real-world implementation supports for schools.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bradshaw, C. P. (2015). Translating research to practice in bullying prevention. American Psychologist, 70(4), 322–332. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039114.
Chalamandaris, A.-G., & Piette, D. (2015). School-based anti-bullying interventions: systematic review of the methodology to assess their effectiveness. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 24, 131–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2015.04.004.
Cross, D., Monks, H., Hall, M., Shaw, T., Pintabona, Y., Erceg, E., ..., Lester, L. (2011). Three-year results of the Friendly Schools whole-of-school intervention on children’s bullying behaviour. British Educational Research Journal, 37(1), 105–129. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920903420024.
Cross, D., Runions, K. C., Resnicow, K. A., Britt, E. F., & Gray, C. (2018). Motivational interviewing as a positive response to high-school bullying. Psychology in the Schools, 55, 464–475. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22120.
Cross, D., Shaw, T., Epstein, M., Pearce, N., Barnes, A., Burns, S., . . . Runions, K.(2018). Impact of the Friendly Schools whole-school intervention on transition to secondary school andadolescent bullying behaviour. European Journal of Education, 53(4), 495–513. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12307
Cross, D., Shaw, T., Hadwen, K., Cardoso, P., Slee, P., Roberts, C., . . . Barnes, A. (2016). Longitudinal impact of the Cyber Friendly Schools program on adolescents’ cyberbullying behavior. Aggressive Behavior, 42(2), 166–180. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21609.
Cross, D., Waters, S., Pearce, N., Shaw, T., Hall, M., Erceg, E., . . . Hamilton, G. (2012). The friendly schools friendly families programme: three-year bullying behaviour outcomes in primary school children. International Journal of Educational Research, 53, 394–406. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2012.05.004.
Durlak, J. A., & DuPre, E. P. (2008). Implementation matters: a review of research on the influence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41(3–4), 327–350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-008-9165-0.
Farrington, D. P., & Ttofi, M. M. (2009a). Reducing school bullying: evidence-based implications for policy. Crime and Justice, 38(1), 281–345.
Farrington, D. P., & Ttofi, M. M. (2009b). School-based programs to reduce bullying and victimization. The Campbell Collaboration, 6, 1–149. https://doi.org/10.1086/599198.
Flay, B. R. (1986). Efficacy and effectiveness trials (and other phases of research) in the development of health promotion programs. Preventive Medicine, 15(5), 451–474.
Foster, P., Arora, T., & Thompson, D. (1990). A whole-school approach to bullying. Pastoral Care in Education, 8(3), 13–17.
Fox, B. H., Farrington, D. P., & Ttofi, M. M. (2012). Successful bullying prevention programs: Influence of research design, implementation features, and program components. International Journal of Conflict and Violence (IJCV), 6(2), 273–282. https://doi.org/10.4119/UNIBI/ijcv.245.
Gottfredson, D. C., Cook, T. D., Gardner, F. E. M., Gorman-Smith, D., Howe, G. W., Sandler, I. N., & Zafft, K. M. (2015). Standards of evidence for efficacy, effectiveness, and scale-up research in prevention science: next generation. Prevention Science, 16(7), 893–926. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-015-0555-x.
Green, S. (2001). Systemic vs individualistic approaches to bullying. JAMA, 286(7), 787–788. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.286.7.787.
Hemphill, S. A., Kotevski, A., Herrenkohl, T. I., Bond, L., Kim, M. J., Toumbourou, J. W., & Catalano, R. F. (2011). Longitudinal consequences of adolescent bullying perpetration and victimisation: a study of students in Victoria, Australia. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 21(2), 107–116. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbm.802.
Hiller, C. R., Pfetsch, J., Schultze-Krumbholz, A., & Ittel, A. (2018). Does media use lead to cyberbullying or vice versa? Testing longitudinal associations using a latent cross-lagged panel design. Computers in Human Behavior, 81, 93–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.12.007.
Kim, M. J., Catalano, R. F., Haggerty, K. P., & Abbott, R. D. (2011). Bullying at elementary school and problem behaviour in young adulthood: a study of bullying, violence and substance use from age 11 to age 21. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 21(2), 136–144. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbm.804.
Krosnick, J. A., & Presser, S. (2010). Question and questionnaire design. In P. V. Marsden & J. D. Wright (Eds.), Handbook of survey research (pp. 263–314). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing.
Lee, S., Kim, C. J., & Kim, D. H. (2015). A meta-analysis of the effect of school-based anti-bullying programs. Journal of Child Health Care, 19(2), 136–153. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367493513503581.
Lester, L., Cross, D., Dooley, J., & Shaw, T. (2013). Developmental trajectories of adolescent victimization: predictors and outcomes. Social Influence, 8(2–3), 107–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/15534510.2012.734526.
Marchand, E., Stice, E., Rohde, P., & Becker, C. B. (2011). Moving from efficacy to effectiveness trials in prevention research. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 49(1), 32–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2010.10.008.
Moore, S. E., Norman, R. E., Sly, P. D., Whitehouse, A. J., Zubrick, S. R., & Scott, J. (2014). Adolescent peer aggression and its association with mental health and substance use in an Australian cohort. Journal of Adolescence, 37(1), 11–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2013.10.006.
Olweus, D. (1992). Bullying among schoolchildren - intervention and prevention. In R. D. Peters, R. J. McMahon, & V. L. Quinsey (Eds.), Aggression and violence throughout the life span (pp. 100–125). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Olweus, D. (1993). Victimization by peers: antecedents and long-term outcomes. Social Withdrawal Inhibition and Shyness in childhood, 315, 315–341.
Olweus, D. (2005). A useful evaluation design, and effects of the Olweus Bullying Prevention Program. Psychology, Crime & Law, 11(4), 389–402. https://doi.org/10.1080/10683160500255471.
Pearce, N., Cross, D., & Alderman, N. (2015). Strong schools safe kids project: final report to Healthway. Perth: Child Health Promotion Research Centre, Edith Cowan University.
Rivers, I., Noret, N., Poteat, V., & Ashurst, N. (2009). Observing bullying at school: the mental health implications of witness status. School Psychology Quarterly, 24(4), 211–223. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018164.
Roland, E. (2002). Bullying, depressive symptoms and suicidal thoughts. Educational Research, 44(1), 55–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131880110107351.
Rollnick, S., Butler, C., Cambridge, J., Kinnersley, P., Elwyn, G., & Resnicow, K. (2005). Consultations about behaviour change. British Medical Journal, 331(7522), 961–963. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.331.7522.961.
Runions, K. C., Salmivalli, C., Shaw, T., Burns, S., & Cross, D. (2018). Beyond the reactive-proactive dichotomy: rage, revenge, reward, and recreational aggression predict early high school bully and bully/victim status. Aggressive Behavior, 44(5), 501–511. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21770.
Ryan, R., & Deci, E. (2000). Self-determination theory & the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development & well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68.
Ryan, W., & Smith, J. D. (2009). Antibullying programs in schools: how effective are evaluation practices? Prevention Science, 10(3), 248–259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-009-0128-y.
Schultze-Krumbholz, A., & Scheithauer, H. (2009a). Cyberbullying and cybervictimsation using behavioural categories- the Berlin Cyberbullying-Cybervictimisation Questionnaire (BCyQ). In Paper presented at the COST Workshop on Cyberbullying. Vilnius, Lithuania: Definition and Measurement Issues.
Schultze-Krumbholz, A., & Scheithauer, H. (2009b). Social-behavioral correlates of cyberbullying in a German student sample. Zeitschrift Fur Psychologie-Journal of Psychology, 217(4), 224–226. https://doi.org/10.1027/0044-3409.217.4.224.
Shaw, T., Dooley, J. J., Cross, D., & Zubrick, S. R. (2013). The forms of bullying scale (FBS): validity and reliability estimates for a measure of bullying victimization and perpetration in adolescence. Psychological Assessment, 25(4), 1045–1057. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032955.
Smith, J. D., Schneider, B., Smith, P. K., & Ananiadou, K. (2004). The effectiveness of whole-school antibullying programs: a synthesis of evaluation research. School Psychology Review, 33, 547–560.
StataCorp. (2015). Stata Statistical Software: Release 14. Retrieved from College Station, TX.
Stevens, V., De Bourdeaudhuij, I., & Van Oost, P. (2001). Anti-bullying interventions at school: aspects of programme adaptation and critical issues for further programme development. Health Promotion International, 16(2), 155–167. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/16.2.155.
Sutton, J., Smith, P. K., & Swettenham, J. (1999). Bullying and ‘theory of mind’: a critique of the ‘social skills deficit’ view of anti-social behaviour. Social Development, 8(1), 117–127. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9507.00083.
Ttofi, M. M., & Farrington, D. P. (2011). Effectiveness of school-based programs to reduce bullying: a systematic and meta-analytic review. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 7(1), 27–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-010-9109-1.
Ttofi, M. M., Farrington, D. P., Loesel, F., & Loeber, R. (2011). The predictive efficiency of school bullying versus later offending: a systematic/meta-analytic review of longitudinal studies. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 21(2), 80–89. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbm.808.
Van Geel, M., Vedder, P., & Tanilon, J. (2014). Relationship between peer victimization, cyberbullying, and suicide in children and adolescents: a meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatrics, 168(5), 435–442. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.4143.
Whitney, I., & Smith, P. K. (1993). A survey of the nature and extent of bullying in junior/middle and secondary schools. Educational Research, 35(1), 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/0013188930350101.
Yeager, D. S., Fong, C. J., Lee, H. Y., & Espelage, D. L. (2015). Declines in efficacy of anti-bullying programs among older adolescents: theory and a three-level meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 37, 36–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2014.11.005.
Acknowledgements
This study was conducted as part of the Beyond Bullying: Positive Change for All study, which was funded in whole by the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC Project 1046086). Donna Cross’ contribution to this paper was supported by an NHMRC Research Fellowship GNT 1119339.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Approval for this research was obtained from the relevant university Human Research Ethics Committee and educational sectors, and the research was conducted in strict accordance with the Australian National Health & Medical Research Council’s National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cross, D., Runions, K.C., Shaw, T. et al. Friendly Schools Universal Bullying Prevention Intervention: Effectiveness with Secondary School Students. Int Journal of Bullying Prevention 1, 45–57 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42380-018-0004-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42380-018-0004-z