Some notes on numerical simulation and error analyses of the attached turbulent cavitating flow by LES

  • Xin-ping Long (龙新平)
  • Yun Long (龙云)
  • Wen-ting Wang (王文婷)
  • Huai-yu Cheng (程怀玉)
  • Bin Ji (季斌)
Article
  • 11 Downloads

Abstract

In this letter, the attached turbulent cavitating flow around the Clark-Y hydrofoil is investigated by the numerical simulation with special emphasis on error analysis of large eddy simulation (LES) for the unsteady cavitation simulation. The numerical results indicate that the present simulation can capture the periodic cavity shedding behavior and show a fairly good agreement with the available experimental data. Further analysis demonstrates that the cavitation has a great influence on LES numerical error and modeling error. The modeling error and numerical error are almost on the same order of magnitude, while the modeling error often shows a little bit larger magnitude than numerical error. The numerical error and modeling error sometimes can partially offset each other if they have the opposite sign. Besides, our results show that cavitation can extend the magnitudes and oscillation levels of numerical error and modeling error.

Keywords

Cavitation cavitating flow large eddy simulation (LES) error analyses verification and validation (V&V) 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Li X. S., Li X. L. All-speed Roe scheme for the large eddy simulation of homogeneous decaying turbulence [J]. International Journal of Computational Fluid Dynamics, 2016, 30(1): 69–78.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Li X. S., Xu J. Z., Gu C. W. Preconditioning method and engineering application of large eddy simulation [J]. Science in China Series G-Physics, Mechanics and Astronomy, 2008, 51(6): 667–677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Wu Q., Huang B., Wang G. et al. The transient characteristics of cloud cavitating flow over a flexible hydrofoil [J]. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 2018, 99: 162–173.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Cui P., Zhang A. M., Wang S. et al. Ice breaking by a collapsing bubble [J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2018, 841: 287–309.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Peng X. X., Ji B., Cao Y. et al. Combined experimental observation and numerical simulation of the cloud cavitation with U-type flow structures on hydrofoils [J]. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 2016, 79: 10–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Ji B., Luo X., Arndt R. E. A. et al. Large eddy simulation and theoretical investigations of the transient cavitating vortical flow structure around a NACA66 hydrofoil [J]. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 2015, 68: 121–134.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Wang Y., Xu C., Wu X. et al. Ventilated cloud cavitating flow around a blunt body close to the free surface [J]. Physical Review Fluids, 2017, 2(8): 084303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Long X., Cheng H., Ji B. et al. Large eddy simulation and Euler-Lagrangian coupling investigation of the transient cavitating turbulent flow around a twisted hydrofoil [J]. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 2018, 100: 41–56.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Cheng H. Y., Long X. P., Ji B. et al. 3-D Lagrangianbased investigations of the time-dependent cloud cavitating flows around a Clark-Y hydrofoil with special emphasis on shedding process analysis [J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2018, 30(1): 122–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Long Y., Long X., Ji B. et al. Verification and validation of URANS simulations of the turbulent cavitating flow around the hydrofoil [J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2017, 29(4): 610–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Xing T. A general framework for verification and validation of large eddy simulations [J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2015, 27(2): 163–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Freitag M., Klein M. An improved method to assess the quality of large eddy simulations in the context of implicit filtering [J]. Journal of Turbulence, 2006, 7(40): 1–11.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Dutta R., Xing T. Quantitative solution verification of large eddy simulation of channel flow [C]. Proceedings of the 2nd Thermal and Fluid Engineering Conference and 4th International Workshop on Heat Transfer, Las Vegas, USA, 2017.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    Huang B., Young Y. L., Wang G. et al. Combined experimental and computational investigation of unsteady structure of sheet/cloud cavitation [J]. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 2013, 135(7): 071301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    Ji B., Long Y., Long X. P. et al. Large eddy simulation of turbulent attached cavitating flow with special emphasis on large scale structures of the hydrofoil wake and turbulence-cavitation interactions [J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2017, 29(1): 27–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    Dutta R., Xing T. Five-equation and robust three-equation methods for solution verification of large eddy simulation [J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2018, 30(1): 23–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© China Ship Scientific Research Center 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xin-ping Long (龙新平)
    • 1
    • 2
  • Yun Long (龙云)
    • 1
    • 2
  • Wen-ting Wang (王文婷)
    • 1
    • 2
  • Huai-yu Cheng (程怀玉)
    • 1
    • 2
  • Bin Ji (季斌)
    • 1
  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering Science, School of Power and Mechanical EngineeringWuhan UniversityWuhanChina
  2. 2.Key Laboratory of Jet Theory and New Technology of Hubei ProvinceWuhan UniversityWuhanChina

Personalised recommendations