Skip to main content
Log in

Streamline similarity method for flow distributions and shock losses at the impeller inlet of the centrifugal pump

  • Article
  • Published:
Journal of Hydrodynamics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An analytical method is presented, which enables the non-uniform velocity and pressure distributions at the impeller inlet of a pump to be accurately computed. The analyses are based on the potential flow theory and the geometrical similarity of the streamline distribution along the leading edge of the impeller blades. The method is thus called streamline similarity method (SSM). The obtained geometrical form of the flow distribution is then simply described by the geometrical variable G(s) and the first structural constant G I . As clearly demonstrated and also validated by experiments, both the flow velocity and the pressure distributions at the impeller inlet are usually highly non-uniform. This knowledge is indispensible for impeller blade designs to fulfill the shockless inlet flow condition. By introducing the second structural constant G II , the paper also presents the simple and accurate computation of the shock loss, which occurs at the impeller inlet. The introduction of two structural constants contributes immensely to the enhancement of the computational accuracies. As further indicated, all computations presented in this paper can also be well applied to the non-uniform exit flow out of an impeller of the Francis turbine for accurately computing the related mean values.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shi F., Tsukamoto H. Numerical study of pressure fluctuations caused by impeller-diffuser interaction in a diffuser pump stage [J]. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 2001, 123(3): 466–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Muggli F., Eisele K., Zhang Zh. et al. Numerical investigations of the flow in a pump turbine in pump mode [C]. ImechE: 3rd European Conference on Turbomachinery, London, UK, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Feng J., Benra F., Dohmen H. Unsteady flow visualization at part-load conditions of a radial diffuser pump: By PIV and CFD [J]. Journal of Visualization, 2009, 12(1): 65–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Guleren K., Pinarbasi A. Numerical simulation of the stalled flow within a vaned centrifugal pump [J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, 2004, 218: 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Zhang Zh. Rotating stall mechanism and stability control in the pump flows [J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part A: Journal of Power and Energy, 2011, 225: 779–788.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hong S., Kim D., Kim J. et al. Study on inducer and impeller of a centrifugal pump for a rocket engine turbopump [J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, 2013, 227: 311–319.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Pfleiderer K. Die kreiselpumpen für flüssigkeiten und gase [M]. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, 1955, 126.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Casey M., Roth P. A streamline curvature throughflow method for radial turbocompressors [C]. International Mechanical Engineering Conference, Solihull, UK, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Casey M., Robinson C. A new streamline curvature throughflow method for radial turbomachinery [J]. Journal of Turbomachinery, 2008, 132(3): 2119–2130.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gong W. Q., Wu R. K., Zhang B. A new finite difference method to solve the velocity gradient equation in streamline curvature method [J]. Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 2016, 8(9): 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wu C. H. A general theory of three-dimensional flow in subsonic and supersonic turbomachines of axial-, radial-, and mixed-flow types [R]. Washington DC, USA: NACA, 1952, NACA-TN-2604.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Stoffel B., Weiss K. Different types and locations of part-load recirculations in centrifugal pumps found from LDA measurements [C]. XVIII IAHR Symposium on Hydraulic Machinery and Caviatation, Valencia, Spain, 1996, II: 1034–1044.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Eisele K. Global und LDA messungen am radialpumpenlaufrad la 033.112 mit unbeschaufeltem und beschaufeltem diffusor [R]. Sulzer Innotec Report, 1992, IT 1773.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang Zh., Titzschkau M. Self-validated calculation of characteristics of a Francis turbine and the mechanism of the S-shape operational instability [J]. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2012, 15(3): 032036.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gülich J. Centrifugal pumps [M]. 2nd Edition, Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, 2010, (Fig. 7.4).

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zh. Zhang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, Z. Streamline similarity method for flow distributions and shock losses at the impeller inlet of the centrifugal pump. J Hydrodyn 30, 140–152 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42241-018-0015-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42241-018-0015-8

Keywords

Navigation