The micro Flapping Rotary Wing (FRW) concept inspired by insects was proposed recently. Its aerodynamic performance is highly related to wing pitching and rotational motions. Therefore, the effect of wing pitching kinematics and rotational speed on unsteady aerodynamic forces and power consumption of a FRW in hovering flight is further studied in this paper using computational fluid dynamics method. Considering a fixed pitching amplitude (i.e., 80°), the vertical force of FRW increases with the downstroke angle of attack and is enhanced by high wing rotational speed. However, a high downstroke angle of attack is not beneficial for acquiring high rotational speed, in which peak vertical force at balance status (i.e., average rotational moment equals zero.) is only acquired at a comparatively small negative downstroke angle of attack. The releasing constraint of pitching amplitude, high rotational speed and enhanced balanced vertical force can be acquired by selecting small pitching amplitude despite high power consumption. To confirm which wing layout is more power efficient for a certain vertical force requirement, the power consumed by FRW is compared with the Rotary Wing (RW) and the Flapping Wing (FW) while considering two angle of attack strategies without the Reynolds number (Re) constraint. FRW and RW are the most power efficient layouts when the target vertical force is produced at an angle of attack that corresponds to the maximum vertical force coefficient and power efficiency, respectively. However, RW is the most power efficient layout overall despite its insufficient vertical force production capability under a certain Re.
micro air vehicle flapping rotary wing aerodynamic forces power consumption computational fluid dynamics
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
This research was primarily supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant number: 11672022).
Shyy W, Aono H, Chimakurthi S K, Trizila P, Kang C-K, Cesnik C E S, Liu H. Recent progress in flapping wing aerodynamics and aeroelasticity. Progress in Aaerospace Ssciences, 2010, 46, 284–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitchett B. Development and Investigation of a Flapping Rotor for Micro Air Vehicles, Master thesis, University of Maryland, College Park, USA, 2007.Google Scholar
Guo S J, Li D C, Huang Z R. A smart material aeroelastic flapping wing micro rotor craft. Proceeding of International Forum on Aeroelasticity and Structural Dynamics, Seattle, USA, 2009, 21–25.Google Scholar
Guo S J, Li D C, Wu J H. Theoretical and experimental study of a piezoelectric flapping wing rotor for micro aerial vehicle. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2012, 23, 429–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou C, Wu J H, Guo S J, Li D C. Experimental study of the lift generated by a flapping rotary wing applied in a micro air vehicle. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 2014, 228, 2083–2093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen L, Zhang Y L, Wu J H. Study on lift enhancement of a flapping rotary wing by a bore-hole design. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 2017, 0954410016688927.Google Scholar
Wu J H, Wang D, Zhang Y L. Aerodynamic analysis of a flapping rotary wing at a low Reynolds number. AIAA Journal, 2015, 53, 2951–2966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu J H, Zhou C, Zhang Y L. Aerodynamic power efficiency comparison of various micro-air-vehicle layouts in hovering flight. AIAA Journal, 2016, 55, 1–12.Google Scholar
Li H, Guo S J, Zhang Y L, Zhou C, Wu J H. Unsteady aerodynamic and optimal kinematic analysis of a micro flapping wing rotor. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2017, 63, 167–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sun M, Lan S L. A computational study of the aerodynamic forces and power requirements of dragonfly (Aeschna juncea) hovering. Journal of Experimental Biology, 2004, 207, 1887–1901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lentink D, Dickinson M H. Rotational accelerations stabilize leading edge vortices on revolving fly wings. Journal of Experimental Biology, 2009, 212, 2705–2719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kruyt, J W, Quicazán-Rubio E M, van Heijst G F, Altshuler D L, Lentink D. Hummingbird wing efficacy depends on aspect ratio and compares with helicopter rotors. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 2009, 11, 20140585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang Z J. The role of drag in insect hovering. Journal of Experimental Biology, 2004, 207, 4147–4155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pesavento U, Wang Z J. Flapping wing flight can save aerodynamic power compared to steady flight. Physical Review Letters, 2009, 103, 118102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zheng L, Hedrick T, Mittal R. A comparative study of the hovering effciency of flapping and revolving wings. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, 2013, 8, 036001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers S E, Kwak D. An upwind differencing scheme for the time-accurate incompressible Navier–Stokes equations. AIAA Journal, 1990, 28, 253–262.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
Rogers S E, Kwak D, Kiris C. Steady and unsteady solutions of the incompressible Navier–Stokes equations. AIAA Journal, 1991, 29, 603–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu J H, Sun M. Unsteady aerodynamic forces of a flapping wing. Journal of Experimental Biology, 2004, 207, 1137–1150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gopalakrishnan P, Tafti D K. Effect of wing flexibility on lift and thrust production in flapping flight. AIAA Journal, 2010, 48, 865–877.CrossRefGoogle Scholar