Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A Two-Level Cross-Sectional Optimization Approach for Automotive Body Concept Design

  • Published:
Automotive Innovation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Concept design is vital important in development of auto-body and it has great effects on later design work. In this paper, a two-level cross-sectional optimization approach is presented to shorten concept design cycles. First, an exact structural analysis approach for spatial semi-rigid framed structures, i.e., the transfer stiffness matrix method proposed in our previous study, is adopted for both static and dynamic analyses of body-in-white (BIW) structure. A two-level cross-sectional optimization approach is then proposed for an automotive BIW lightweight design, and genetic algorithm is used to solve the optimization models. Afterward, an object-oriented MATLAB toolbox, using distributed parallel computing techniques, is developed to promote the concept design of the BIW structure. Finally, relevant numerical examples demonstrate the validity and accuracy of the proposed method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

TSMM:

Transfer stiffness matrix method

TMM:

Transfer matrix method

BIW:

Body-in-white

GA:

Genetic algorithm

k :

Local stiffness matrix

u :

Displacement vector

Q :

End force vector

T :

Transfer stiffness matrix

S :

Structural stiffness matrix

d :

Unknown joint displacement vector

P :

Joint load vector

DOF:

Degree of freedom

abcd:

Auto-body concept design

h :

Height of thin-walled rectangular section

w :

Width of thin-walled rectangular section

t :

Thickness of thin-walled rectangular section

m :

BIW conceptual structure mass function

\(\delta \) :

Maximum vertical deflection

\(\phi \) :

Twist angle

\(\mathrm{freq}\) :

First-order eigenfrequency

x :

Design variable vector

LB :

Lower bound

UB :

Upper bound

\(\theta \) :

Counterclockwise angle

SV:

Scale vector coefficient

\({n}^{\prime }_\mathrm{aa}\) :

Number of acute angle

\({n}^{\prime }_\mathrm{ip}\) :

Number of intersection point

\({n}^{\prime }_\mathrm{ii} \) :

Number of invalid interior point

OPM:

Optimum

\(S_\mathrm{p}\) :

Speedup of the parallel algorithm

References

  1. Nishigaki, H., Nishiwaki, S., Amago, T., et al.: First order analysis—new CAE tools for automotive body designers. In: SAE 2001 World Congress, pp. 1–13, Detroit (2001)

  2. Nishigaki, H., Amago, T., Sugiura, H., et al.: First order analysis for automotive body structure design—part 1: overview and applications. In: Proceedings of SAE 2004 World Congress & Exhibition, pp. 1–11, Detroit (2004)

  3. Tsurumi, Y., Nishigaki, H., Nakagawa, T., et al.: First order analysis for automotive body structure design—part 2: joint analysis considering nonlinear behavior. In: Proceedings of SAE 2004 World Congress & Exhibition, pp. 1–11, Detroit (2004)

  4. Nishigaki, H., Kikuchi, N.: First order analysis for automotive body structure design—part 3: crashworthiness analysis using beam elements. In: Proceedings of SAE 2004 World Congress & Exhibition, pp. 1–12, Detroit (2004)

  5. Nakagawa, T., Nishigaki, H., Tsurumi, Y., et al.: First order analysis for automotive body structure design—part 4: noise and vibration analysis applied to a subframe. In: Proceedings of SAE 2004 World Congress & Exhibition, pp. 1–10, Detroit (2004)

  6. Hou, W.B., Zhang, H.Z., Chi, R.F., et al.: Development of an intelligent CAE system for auto-body concept design. Int. J. Auto. Tech.-Kor. 10(2), 175–180 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hou, W.B., Zhang, H.Z., Zhang, W., et al.: Rapid structural property evaluation system for car body advanced design. Int. J. Vehicle Des. 57, 242–253 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hou, W.B., Shan, C.L., Zhang, H.Z.: Multi-level optimization method for vehicle body in conceptual design. In: Proceedings of ASME 2015 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, pp. 1–10. Boston (2015)

  9. Zuo, W.J., Li, W., Xu, T., et al.: A complete development process of finite element software for body-in-white structure with semi-rigid beams in.NET framework. Adv. Eng. Softw. 45(1), 261–271 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zuo, W.J.: An object-oriented graphics interface design and optimization software for cross-sectional shape of automobile body. Adv. Eng. Softw. 64, 1–10 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zuo, W.J.: Bi-level optimization for the cross-sectional shape of a thin-walled car body frame with static stiffness and dynamic frequency stiffness constraints. P. I. Mech. Eng. D-J. Aut. 229(8), 1046–1059 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Qin, H., Liu, Z.J., Liu, Y., et al.: An object-oriented MATLAB toolbox for automotive body concept design using distributed parallel optimization. Adv. Eng. Softw. 106, 19–32 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kassimali, A.: Matrix Analysis of Structures SI Version, pp. 553–568. Cengage Learning, Boston (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  14. McGuire, W., Gallagher, R.H., Ziemian, R.D.: Matrix Structural Analysis, 2nd edn, pp. 56–130. Wiley, Hoboken (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Banerjee, J.R.: Dynamic stiffness formulation for structural elements: a general approach. Comput. Struct. 63(1), 101–103 (1997)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Lee, U.: Spectral Element Method in Structural Dynamics, pp. 41–53. Wiley, Hoboken (2009)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. Smith, I.M., Griffiths, D.V., Margetts, L.: Programming the Finite Element Method, 5th edn, pp. 67–68. Wiley, Hoboken (2014)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Wittrick, W.H., William, F.W.: A general algorithm for computing natural frequencies of elastic structures. Q. J. Mech. Appl. Math. 24(3), 263–284 (1971)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Goldberg, D.E.: Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization and Machine Learning, pp. 1–25. Addison-Wesley, Boston (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Datta, R., Deb, K.: Evolutionary Constrained Optimization, pp. 3–5. Springer, Berlin (2015)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Yim, H.J., Lee, S.B., Pyun, S.D.: A study on optimum design for thin walled beam structures of vehicles. In: International Body Engineering Conference & Exhibition and Automotive & Transportation Technology Congress, pp. 1–8, Detroit (2002)

  22. Genetic Algorithms Toolbox (2001). http://codem.group.shef.ac.uk/index.php/ga-toolbox

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51475152).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zijian Liu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Qin, H., Liu, Z., Liu, Y. et al. A Two-Level Cross-Sectional Optimization Approach for Automotive Body Concept Design. Automot. Innov. 1, 122–130 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42154-018-0022-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42154-018-0022-z

Keywords

Navigation