Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

CFD simulation of hemispherical domes: structural flexibility and interference factors

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Asian Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The computational fluid dynamics (CFD) method is widely used today for determining the wind action on structures. Along with the CFD method the wind tunnel experiments are also employed to achieve this purpose. The cost and effort required for a wind tunnel test, however, is much higher than that of the CFD method; therefore, it is beneficial to extend and validate the use of CFD method to various classes and types of structures. This paper firstly compares the results of CFD method with the results of three series of wind tunnel tests available in the literature. Then, numerically the effect of structural flexibility and the neighbourhood of the objects on the wind pressure distribution coefficients are studied. Two and three half spheres are arranged sequentially and transversally. According to the CFD analysis, at a clear distance greater than 2.5 times the diameter of the (obstructing) dome, the wind dynamic interference effects on the reference hemisphere are diminished.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baker, C. J. (2007). The past, present and future of wind engineering. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 95, 843–870.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blocken, B. (2014). 50 years of computational wind engineering: Past, present and future. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 129, 69–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, C. M., & Fu, C. L. (2010). Characteristic of wind loads on a hemispherical dome in smooth flow and turbulent boundary layer flow. Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 98, 328–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kateris, D. L., Fragos, V. P., Kotsopoulos, T. A., Martzopoulou, A. G., & Moshou, D. (2012). Calculated external pressure coefficient on livestock buildings and comparison with Eurocode 1. Wind and Structures, 6, 481–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, C. S. H., Chua, C. K., & Yeo, J. H. (2014). Aerodynamics of badminton shuttlecock: Characterization of flow around a conical skirt with gaps, behind a hemispherical dome. Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 127, 29–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michalski, A., Kermel, P. D., Haug, E., Ohner, R. L., Uchner, R. W., & Bletzinger, K. (2011). Validation of the computational fluid-structure interaction simulation at real-scale tests of a flexible 29 m umbrella in natural wind flow. Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 99, 400–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montaazeri, H., & Blocken, B. (2013). CFD simulation of Wind-induced pressure coefficient on buildings with and without balconies: Validation and sensitivity analysis. Building and Environment, 60, 137–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nieto, F., Hernández, S., Jurado, J. A., & Baldomir, A. (2010). CFD practical application in conceptual design of a 425 m cable-stayed bridge. Wind and Structures, 13, 309–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qiu, Y., Sun, Y., Wu, Y., & Tamura, Y. (2014). Modelling the mean wind loads on cylindrical roofs with consideration of the Reynolds number effect in uniform flow with low turbulence. Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 129, 11–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramponi, R., & Blocken, B. (2012). CFD simulation of cross-ventilation flow for different isolated building configuration: Validation with wind tunnel measurements and analysis of physical and numerical diffusion effects. Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 104, 408–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rizzo, F., D’Asdia, P., Lazzari, M., & Procino, L. (2011). Wind action evaluation on tension roofs of hyperbolic paraboloid shape. Engineering Structures, 33(2), 445–461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.11.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadeghi, H., Heristchian, M., Aziminejad, A., & Nooshin, H. (2017). Wind effect on grooved and scallop domes. Engineering Structures, 148, 436–450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.07.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, Y., Qiu, Y., & Wu, Y. (2013). Modelling of wind pressure spectra on spherical domes. International Journal of Space Structures, 28(2), 87–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uematsu, Y., et al. (1997). Wind loads and wind-induced dynamic behaviour of a single-layer latticed dome. Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 66, 227–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vizotto, I., & Ferreira, A. M. (2015). Wind force coefficient on hexagonal free form shells. Engineering Structures, 83, 17–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, A.-S., Wen, C. Y., Juan, Y. H., Su, Y. M., & Wu, J. H. (2014). Using the central ventilation shaft design within public buildings for natural aeration enhancement. Applied Thermal Engineering, 70, 219–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mahmoud Heristchian.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sadeghi, H., Heristchian, M., Aziminejad, A. et al. CFD simulation of hemispherical domes: structural flexibility and interference factors. Asian J Civ Eng 19, 535–551 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-018-0040-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-018-0040-5

Keywords

Navigation