Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Investigation of the behavior of reinforced concrete-coupled shear wall with opening using IDA analysis

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Asian Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In a tunnel formwork system, concrete pour of the walls and ceilings is usually combined simultaneously and is done in one step. This causes the structure to be homogenized and also minimizes the number of cold connections in the structure. This system includes static formworks; thus, during the implementation of the structure, these formworks are seamlessly moved from place to place by lifters and cranes. This system combines quality, accuracy, and pace. An incremental dynamic analysis is a parametric analysis based on nonlinear dynamic analysis. This analysis method has been approved by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) in the last decade and has been considered in the FEMA 350 and FEMA 351 standards for determining the overall disruption capacity of the structure. In this study, two, one-story buildings, one of which including openings and the other not including one, is analyzed by the ABAQUS software. The results indicate that the building without an opening demonstrates a better behavior than the one including openings. In this study, the effect of existence of openings on base shear as well as ductility and resistance factor, which are effective factors on the response modifier factor, is considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ABAQUS theory manual and user’s manual. Version 6.13 (2013).

  • ACI 318–08. (2008). Building code requirements for structural concrete and commentary. ACI 318–08, American Concrete Institute: Farmington Hills, MI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aghayari, R., Roudsari, M. T., Ashrafy, M. (2012). Base shear and fundamental period of RC coupling beam structures. International Conference on Transport, Environment and Civil Engineering Kuala Lumpur.

  • Ali, A., Wight, J. K. (2000). RC structural walls with staggered door openings. Journal of Structural Engineering, 117(5), 1514–1531.

  • ATC. (1978). Tentative provision for the development of seismic regulations for buildings (pp. 45–53). Redwood City: ATC-3-06, Applied Technology Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • ATC. (1995). A critical review of current approaches to earthquake resistant design (pp. 31–36). Redwood city: ATC-34, Applied Technology Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beheshti A. S. B. & Asayesh, M. J. (2017). Seismic performance evaluation of asymmetric reinforced concrete tunnel form buildings. Structures, 10, 157–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balkaya, C., Kalkan, E. (2004). Seismic vulnerability, behavior and design of tunnel form building structures. Engineering Structures, 26(14), 2081–2099.

  • Beheshti Aval, S. B., Mohsenian, V., & Nikpour, N. (2015). Seismic characteristic of tunnel form concrete buildings with irregular plan. Journal of Solid and Fluid Mechanics, 3, 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beheshti, A. S., & Mohsenian, V. (2016). Probabilistic seismic performance model for tunnel form concrete building structures. Journal of Structural and Construction Engineering, 3(3), 42–57. (Article 4).

    Google Scholar 

  • Eshghi, S., Tavafoghi, A. (2012). Seismic behavior of tunnel form building structures. Int. Inst. of Earthquake Engineering and Seismology (IIEES), Tehran, Iran.

  • Fajfar, P. (2002). Structural analysis in earthquake engineering, a breakthrough of simplified nonlinear method. 12th European Conference on Earhquake Engineering.

  • Hamid, N. H., Saleh, S. M., Anuar, S. A. (2014). Seismic performance of double-unit tunnel form building under in-plan lateral cyclic loading. WIT Transaction on the Built Environment, 141.

  • Kalkan, E., Yuksel, S. B. (2007). Pros and Cons of multi story RC tunnel-form (box-type) buildings. The Structural Design of Tall AND Special Buildings, 17(3), 601–617.

  • Keykhosravi, A., Aghayari, R. (2016). Evaluating response modification factor (R) of reinforced concrete frames with chevron brace equipped with steel slit damper. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 1–7.

  • Mosoarca, M., Stoian, V., & Truta, M. (2002). Nonlinear analysis of seismic behavior of R.C shear wall with staggered openings. Ovidius University Anaals of constructions, 1(3), 119–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mwafy, A. M., & Elnashai, A. S. (2002). Calibration of force reduction factors of RC buildings. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 6(2), 239–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naeim F. (2001). The seismic design handbook (2nd ed.). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

  • Niknam, A., & Kazemi, M. (2009). Evaluation and comparison of seismic effects of near-fault and far-fault region with standard project spectrum of code of practice 2800 of Iran. Journal of Civil Engineering of Islamic Azad University, 2(1), 71–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sosidharan, A., Aslam, M., (2015). Comparative study of tunnel form and framed buildings by dynamic analysis. International Conference on Technological Advancements in structures and construction, June.

  • Sotoudeh, Y., Salehi, M., Moradzadeh, S., Taghipoor, H., & Behboodi, M. (2013). Building technology for mass concrete tunnel form method. Advances in Environmental Biology, 7(9), 2190–2194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tavafoghi, A., Eshghi, S. (2008). Seismic behavior of tunnel form concrete building structures. The 14 th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, October 12–17, Beijing, China.

  • Tavafoghi, A., & Eshghi, S. (2011). Evaluation of behavior factor of tunnel-form concrete building structures using Applied Technology Council 63 methodology. The Structure Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 22(8), 615–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tehranizade, M., & Movahed, H. (2011). The investigation of steel moment-resisting frames in tall structures in near-fault range. Journal of Civil Engineering and Mapping, 5(44), 621–633.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vamvatsikos, D., & Allin Cornell, C. (2002). Incremental dynamic analysis. International Association for Earthquake Engineering, 31(3), 491–514.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, T., & Hsu, T. T. C. (2001). Nonlinear finite element analysis of concrete structures using new constitutive models. Computer and Structures, 79(32), 2781–2791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Structural Engineering, Department of Civil Engineering, Razi university, Kermanshah, Iran

    Safoura Darabi

  2. Department of Civil Engineering, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran

    Reza Aghayari

Authors
  1. Safoura Darabi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Reza Aghayari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Reza Aghayari.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Darabi, S., Aghayari, R. Investigation of the behavior of reinforced concrete-coupled shear wall with opening using IDA analysis. Asian J Civ Eng 19, 319–332 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-018-0030-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-018-0030-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation