Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Operative Therapie: Ist die transurethrale Resektion der Prostata noch Goldstandard?

Surgical treatment: is transurethral resection of the prostate still the gold standard?

  • Extended Abstract
  • Published:
Urologie in der Praxis Aims and scope

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3
Abb. 4

Literatur

  1. Gravas SCJ, Drake MU et al (2018) EAU Guidelines on management of non-neurogenic male lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), incl. benign prostatic obstruction (BPO). https://uroweb.org/guideline/treatment-of-non-neurogenic-male-luts/. Zugegriffen: 02.01.2019

    Google Scholar 

  2. Varkarakis J, Bartsch G, Horninger W (2004) Long-term morbidity and mortality of transurethral prostatectomy: a 10-year follow-up. Prostate 58:248–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ahyai SA, Gilling P et al (2010) Meta-analysis of functional outcomes and complications following transurethral procedures for lower urinary tract symptoms resulting from benign prostatic enlargement. Eur Urol 58(3):384–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Madersbacher S, Marberger M (1999) Is transurethral resection of the prostate still justified? BJU Int 83:227–237

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Reich O, Gratzke C et al (2008) Morbidity, mortality and early outcome of transurethral resection of the prostate: a prospective multicenter evaluation of 10,654 patients. J Urol 180:246–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ahyai SA, Lehrich K et al (2007) Holmium laser enucleation versus transurethral resection of the prostate: 3‑year follow-up results of a randomized clinical trial. Eur Urol 52:1456–1463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Roos NP, Wennberg JE et al (1989) Mortality and reoperation after open and transurethral resection of the prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia. N Engl J Med 320:1120–1124

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kaya C, Ilktac A et al (2007) The long-term results of transurethral vaporization of the prostate using plasmakinetic energy. BJU Int 99:845–848

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mamoulakis C, Trompetter M et al (2009) Bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate: the ‘golden standard’ reclaims its leading position. Curr Opin Urol 19:26–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wroclawski ML et al (2016) ‘button type’ bipolar plasma vaporisation of the prostate compared with standard transurethral resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis of short-term outcome studies. BJU Int 117:662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hoy NY, Van Zyl et al (2015) Initial Canadian experience with robotic simple prostatectomy: case series and literature review. Can Urol Assoc J 9(9–1):E626–E630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Umari P et al (2017) Robotic assistec simple prostatectomy versus holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for lower urinary tract symptoms in patients with large volume prostate: a comparative analysis from a high volume center. J Urol 197:1108–1114

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Klinik für Urologie, EBU Certified Training Centre, Kantonsspital Winterthur, Brauerstrasse 15, 8401, Winterthur, Schweiz

    Christian Padevit

Authors
  1. Christian Padevit
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christian Padevit.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

C. Padevit gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Dieser Beitrag beinhaltet keine vom Autor durchgeführten Studien an Menschen oder Tieren.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Padevit, C. Operative Therapie: Ist die transurethrale Resektion der Prostata noch Goldstandard?. Urol. Prax. 21, 17–19 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41973-019-0045-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41973-019-0045-z

Search

Navigation