Skip to main content
Log in

Risk-based approach towards design evaluation and re-assessment of shutdown safety margin

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Life Cycle Reliability and Safety Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Traditional approach for design, operation and regulation of the nuclear plants is deterministic in nature where the principle of defense in depth governs incorporation of multiple barriers and levels of protection. Single failure criteria, redundancy, diversity, fail safe criteria, quality assurance, etc., form the major cornerstone of this approach for safety demonstration. Traditional approach, which is conservative and prescriptive in nature, has served well for high level of safety since the inception of nuclear industry. However, with the accumulation of operating experiences, insights obtained from the accidents in the nuclear plants and growth of the probabilistic risk assessment methods, there is an increasing trend to implement a risk-informed approach in the nuclear plants. Over conservatism built in design, operation and regulation can be addressed using quantitative insights on risk and uncertainty such that the system availability or performance can be enhanced without compromising the safety. This paper proposes an integrated risk-based approach wherein probabilistic risk assessment framework has been used along with the deterministic insights to give credit to the available design provision in the nuclear plants. The objective is to use the margins available with the existing design to demonstrate safety of the plant by using risk framework along with the improved understanding of uncertainty. The model and procedure, involved in the risk-based approach, have been demonstrated through a case study performed on an Indian research reactor.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • A Brief History of Nuclear Accidents Worldwide (2018) http://www.ucsusa.org/nuclear-power/nuclear-power-accidents/history-nuclear-accidents. Accessed 31 Aug 2018

  • Agarwal SK, Karhadkar CG, Zope AK, Singh K (2006) Dhruva: main design features, operational experience and utilization. Nucl Eng Des 236(7):747–757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Applications of Probabilistic Safety Assessment (PSA) for Nuclear Power Plants (2002) Series: IAEA TECDOC Series, No. 1200. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna

  • Basic Safety Principles for Nuclear Power Plants (1999) 75-INSAG-3 Rev.1 (series: INSAG Series, No. 12, STI-PUB-1082). International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna

  • Defence in Depth in Nuclear Safety (1996) Series: IAEA INSAG series, no. 10, STI/PUB/1013. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna

  • Deterministic Safety Analysis for Nuclear Power Plants (2010) Series: IAEA safety standard series, no. SSG-2, STI/PUB/1428. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna

  • FCOAST (1960) Adapted version of AECL code COASTDOWN developed by NRX staff

  • Hannaman GW, Spurgin AJ, Lukic YD (1984) Human cognitive reliability model for PRA analysis, Draft Report, NUS-5431, EPRI-2170-3. Electric Power Research Institute

  • Kinard M, Allen EJ (2004) Efficient numerical solution of the point kinetics equations in nuclear reactor dynamics. Ann Nucl Energy 31(9):1039–1051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazumdar T et al (2012) RITAC: reactivity initiated transient analysis code—an overview. Ann Nucl Energy 43:192–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PRIS: Power Reactor Information System (2018) International Atomic Energy Agency. http://www.iaea.org/pris. Accessed 31 Aug 2018

  • Research Reactors (2018) World Nuclear Association. http://www.world-nuclear.org/information-library/non-power-nuclear-applications/radioisotopes-research/research-reactors.aspx. Accessed 31 Aug 2018

  • Safety of Research Reactors (2016) Series: IAEA safety standard series, no. SSR-3, STI/PUB/1751. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna

  • Singh T et al (2013) Development of neutronics and thermal hydraulics coupled code—SAC-RIT for plate type fuel and its application to reactivity initiated transient analysis. Ann Nucl Energy 62:61–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swain AD, Guttman HE (1983) Handbook of human reliability analysis with emphasis on Nuclear Power Plant Applications. NUREG/CR-1278, United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

  • United States Atomic Energy Commission (1975) Reactor safety study: an assessment of accident risks in U.S. Commercial Nuclear Power Plant: Executive summary: Main report. WASH-1400-MR, United States Atomic Energy Commission

  • United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission (1987) Standard review plan for the review of safety analysis reports for nuclear power plants, NUREG-0800, United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

  • United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission (1995) Use of probabilistic risk assessment methods in nuclear regulatory activities; final policy statement (60 FR 42622) 1995. https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/commission/policy/60fr42622.pdf. Accessed 18 Sep 2017

  • United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission (2000) Technical basis and implementation guidelines for A Technique for Human Reliability Analysis (ATHENA). NUREG/CR-1624, United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arihant Jain.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Varde, P.V., Singh, T., Mazumdar, T. et al. Risk-based approach towards design evaluation and re-assessment of shutdown safety margin. Life Cycle Reliab Saf Eng 7, 215–234 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41872-018-0047-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41872-018-0047-7

Keywords

Navigation