Skip to main content
Log in

Instrumented Indentation Test in the Nano-range: Performances Comparison of Testing Machines Calibration Methods

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Nanomanufacturing and Metrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the modern manufacturing industry, dealing with innovative productions and advanced materials, technological surface characterisation is becoming crucial to qualify components and optimise processes. Instrumented indentation test is an effective method for characterising mechanical behaviour of materials through the analysis of the force–displacement curve obtained during the implementation of a predefined loading/unloading cycle. Instrumented indentation test allows for hardness test to be performed at different force ranges, thus enabling bulk to local material characterisation. To guarantee the characterisation accuracy, rigorous procedures for the calibration of testing machines are defined in ISO 14577-2. In particular, calibration of frame compliance and indenter area function may be addressed according to methods which do not require the indenter area function to be known a priori, thus avoiding the need of high-resolution microscopes. The present work aims at comparing performances and compatibility of these methodologies by considering tests performed in the nano-range.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

(Courtesy of Hysitron)

Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alekhin VP, Berlin GS, Shorshorov MC (1971) Instruments for micromechanical tests of solid materials. Instrum Exp Tech USSR 14(4):1265

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lucca DA, Herrmann K, Klopfstein MJ (2010) Nanoindentation: measuring methods and applications. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 59(2):803–819

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Doerner MF, Nix WD (1986) A method for interpreting the data from depth-sensing indentation instruments. J Mater Res 1:601–609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Oliver WC, Pharr GM (1992) An improved technique for determining hardness and elastic modulus using load and displacement sensing indentation experiments. J Mater Res 7(6):1564–1583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Oliver WC, Pharr GM (2004) Measurement of hardness and elastic modulus by instrumented indentation: advances in understanding and refinements to methodology. J Mater Res 19(1):3–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. ISO 14577-1:2015 Metallic materials-instrumented indentation test for hardness and materials parameters-part 1: test method. ISO, Genève, Switzerland

  7. Engqvist H, Wiklund U (2004) Mapping of mechanical properties of WC–Co using nanoindentation. Tribol Lett 8(2–3):147–152

    Google Scholar 

  8. Nix WD, Gao H (1998) Indentation size effect in crystalline materials: a law for strain gradient plasticity. J Mech Phys Solids 46(3):411–425

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Kim JY, Kang SK, Lee JJ, Jang J, Lee YH, Kwon D (2007) Influence of surface-roughness on indentation size effect. Acta Mater 55(10):3555–3562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hou X, Jennett NM, Parlinska-Wojtan M (2013) Exploiting interactions between structure size and indentation size effects to determine the characteristic dimension of nano-structured materials by indentation. J Phys D Appl Phys 46(26):265301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cagliero R, Barbato G, Maizza G, Genta G (2015) Measurement of elastic modulus by instrumented indentation in the macro-range: uncertainty evaluation. Int J Mech Sci 101–102:161–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. ISO 14577-2:2015 Metallic materials-instrumented indentation test for hardness and materials parameters-part 2: verification and calibration of testing machines. ISO, Genève, Switzerland

  13. Barbato G, Genta G, Cagliero R, Galetto M, Hlopfstein MJ, Lucca DA, Levi R (2017) Uncertainty evaluation of indentation modulus in the nano-range: contact stiffness contribution. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 66:495–498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Herrmann K, Jennet NM, Wegener W, Meneve J, Hasche K, Seeman R (2000) Progress in determination of the area function of indenters used for nanoindentation. Thin Solid Films 377–378:394–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Meneve JL, Smith JF, Jennett NM, Saunders SRJ (1996) Surface mechanical property testing by depth sensing indentation. Appl Surf Sci 100–101:64–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. JCGM 100:2008, Evaluation of measurement data—guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurements (GUM), JCGM, Sèvres, France

  17. JCGM 101:2008, Evaluation of measurement data—supplement 1 to the “Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement”—propagation of distributions using a Monte Carlo method, JCGM, Sèvres, France

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Dr Massimo Lorusso of Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia for his availability and expertise in operating the testing equipment and for having performed the measurements.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maurizio Galetto.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Galetto, M., Maculotti, G., Genta, G. et al. Instrumented Indentation Test in the Nano-range: Performances Comparison of Testing Machines Calibration Methods. Nanomanuf Metrol 2, 91–99 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41871-019-00035-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41871-019-00035-5

Keywords

Navigation