Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Realizing the End-of-life Considerations in the Design of Food Packaging

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of Packaging Technology and Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Inefficient collaboration between design and waste management is one of the primary reasons for increasing accumulation of packaging waste. Regarding the food-pack combination, the focus of packaging research is on food preservation as the environmental impact of discarded food is comparatively more than that of its packaging. Despite numerous research and development in the field of food packaging, the resulting designs normally perform as ‘envisioned’ until the product consumption stage, and its performance during actual end-of-life stages differs than the design predictions. The reason being that the regional factors and stakeholders for a waste management setup vary from case to case, that has not been considered yet during the design stage. The food packaging design process has the potential to assist designers in applying the latest research and developments to the practical implementation. However, food packaging design to facilitate material recovery with varying waste management considerations have not been addressed till date. In this work, the food packaging design process and the important factors that influence the design team while generating packaging designs, are studied. Further, the contextual end-of-life issues are categorically analyzed regarding food packaging design process and the emerging opportunities are explored. The necessary design and research strategies to facilitate contextual end-of-life considerations in the food packaging design process, are also proposed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aarnio T, Hämäläinen A (2008) Challenges in packaging waste management in the fast food industry. Resour Conserv Recycl 52(4):612–621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Álvarez-Chávez CR, Edwards S, Moure-Eraso R, Geiser K (2012) Sustainability of bio-based plastics: general comparative analysis and recommendations for improvement. J Clean Prod 23(1):47–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Azzi A, Battini D, Persona A, Sgarbossa F (2012) Packaging design: general framework and research agenda. Packaging Technol Sci 25(8):435–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Banerjee S, Meghwal M, Vivek CS et al (2017) Utilization of used packaging materials for steam pipes insulation. J Package Technol Res 1:45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41783-017-0005-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Barlow CY, Morgan DC (2013) Polymer film packaging for food: an environmental assessment. Resour Conserv Recycl 78:74–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Barmaki H (2012) The role of design in sustainable consumption: a study on sustainable food packaging. Istanbul Technical University

  7. Battini D, Calzavara M, Persona A, Sgarbossa F (2016) Sustainable packaging development for fresh food supply chains. Packaging Technol Sci 29(1):25–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Baxter W, Aurisicchio M, Childs PR (2016) Tear here: the impact of object transformations on proper disposal. In: 20th IAPRI World Conference on Packaging. Campinas, Brazil

  9. Bertolini M, Bottani E, Vignali G, Volpi A (2016) Comparative life cycle assessment of packaging systems for extended shelf life milk. Packag Technol Sci 29(10):525–546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Blijlevens J, Mugge R, Ye P, Schoormans JP (2013) The influence of product exposure on trendiness and aesthetic appraisal. Int J Design 7(1):55–67

    Google Scholar 

  11. Boström M, Klintman M (2008) Eco-standards, product labelling and green consumerism

  12. Bramklev C (2009) On a proposal for a generic package development process. Packag Technol Sci 22(3):171–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Braungart M, McDonough W, Bollinger A (2007) Cradle-to-cradle design: creating healthy emissions–a strategy for eco-effective product and system design. J Clean Prod 15(13–14):1337–1348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ceppa C, Marino GP (2012) Food-pack waste systemic management. Alternative ways to reuse materials and to develop new business, products and local markets. Procedia Environ Sci 16:616–623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chan JW, Tong TK (2007) Multi-criteria material selections and end-of-life product strategy: grey relational analysis approach. Mater Des 28(5):1539–1546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Cross N (2008) Engineering design methods: strategies for product design. Wiley Blackwell, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  17. Dinakaran A, Co M, Panda SK et al (2017) Ready to eat cassava (Manihot esculenta crantz) in see through retort pouch and its storage stability. J Package Technol Res 1:193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41783-017-0016-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Dominic CA, Östlund S, Buffington J, Masoud MM (2015) Towards a conceptual sustainable packaging development model: a corrugated box case study. Packag Technol Sci 28(5):397–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Enval (2014) Making laminate packaging recycling a reality. https://www.mrw.co.uk/enval-making-laminate-packaging-recycling-a-reality/8648725.article. Accessed 12 Jan 2017

  20. Envirowise (2013) Packaging design for the environment: reducing costs and quantities

  21. European Commission (2014) Directive 94/62/Ec on packaging and packaging waste (vol. 3)

  22. Fiberstone (2014) What is fiberstone. http://46.17.94.42/fiberstone.co.uk//what_is_fiberstone.html. Accessed 15 Jan 2017

  23. FDA (2010) Guidance for industry: use of recycled plastics in food packaging. food and drug administration

  24. Gourmelon G (2015) Global plastic production rises, recycling lags. Revista tcnocientifica URU

  25. Grönman K, Soukka R, Järvi-Kääriäinen T, Katajajuuri JM, Kuisma M, Koivupuro HK, Ollila M, Pitkänen M, Miettinen O, Silvenius F, Thun R (2013) Framework for sustainable food packaging design. Packag Technol Sci 26(4):187–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hoornweg D, Bhada-Tata P (2012) What a waste: a global review of solid waste management. Urban development series: knowledge papers

  27. ITC (2012) ITC sustainability report. Chennai

  28. Janwani (2016) Zero garbage project. http://janwani.org/site/projects/zero-garbage-project/. Accessed 5 Dec 2016

  29. de la Fuente J, Gustafson S, Twomey C, Bix L (2015) An affordance-based methodology for package design. Packag Technol Sci 28(2):157–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Katajajuuri JM, Silvenius F, Koivupuro HK, Thun R (2010) Preventing environmental impacts of products by proper packaging: conclusions from LCA case studies as main rationale for packaging designer toolbox. In: Proceedings of the 17th IAPRI World Conference on Packaging 2010

  31. Kauppinen-Räisänen H (2014) Strategic use of colour in brand packaging. Packag Technol Sci 27(1):663–676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Khan A, Tandon P (2015) Design for multiple life cycles: A teaching-learning pedagogy for designing products for multiple life cycles. In: 3rd International Conference on Creativity and Innovations at Grassroots, Ahmedabad, India. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.29614.10562

  33. Khan A, Tandon P (2017) Closing the Loop: ‘Systems Perspective’ for the Design of Food Packaging to Facilitate Material Recovery. In: Chakrabarti A, Chakrabarti D (eds) Research into Design for Communities, Volume 2. ICoRD 2017. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 66. Springer, Singapore, pp 349–359

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  34. Korkmaz A, Yanik J, Brebu M, Vasile C (2009) Pyrolysis of the tetra pak. Waste Manage 29(11):2836–2841

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Koszela G, Szczesny W (2017) Changes in food waste level in the EU countries. Acta Sci 43(1):85–225

    Google Scholar 

  36. Kumar GM, Irshad A, Raghunath BV, Rajarajan G (2016) Waste management in food packaging industry. In: Integrated waste management in India 2016 (pp. 265–277). Springer, Cham

  37. Langley J, Turner N, Yoxall A (2011) Attributes of packaging and influences on waste. Packag Technol Sci 24(3):161–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Lewis H, Verghese K, Fitzpatrick L (2010) Evaluating the sustainability impacts of packaging: the plastic carry bag dilemma. Packag Technol Sci 23(3):145–160

    Google Scholar 

  39. Li Y (2014) Business model innovation of social entrepreneurship firm: a case study of TerraCycle. In: 21th Annual International Conference on Management Science and Engineering, ICMSE 2014

  40. Lim VV (2017) Design opportunities in reducing domestic food waste: a collective approach (Doctoral dissertation, Technische Universiteit Eindhoven)

  41. Lindh H, Olsson A, Williams H (2016) Consumer perceptions of food packaging: contributing to or counteracting environmentally sustainable development? Packag Technol Sci 29(1):3–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Ljungberg LY (2007) Materials selection and design for development of sustainable products. Mater Des 28(2):466–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Luijsterburg B, Goossens H (2014) Assessment of plastic packaging waste: material origin, methods, properties. Resour Conserv Recycl 85:88–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Mahalik NP, Nambiar AN (2010) Trends in food packaging and manufacturing systems and technology. Trends Food Sci Technol 21(3):117–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Marsh K, Bugusu B (2007) Food packaging—roles, materials, and environmental issues. J Food Sci 72(3):R39–R55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Martinho G, Pires A, Portela G, Fonseca M (2015) Factors affecting consumers’ choices concerning sustainable packaging during product purchase and recycling. Resour Conserv Recycl 103:58–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. McDonough W, Braungart M (2013) The upcycle: beyond sustainability—designing for abundance, Macmillan. North Point Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  48. Ordoñez I, Rahe U (2013) Collaboration between design and waste management: can it help close the material loop? Resour Conserv Recycl 72:108–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Parfitt J, Barthel M, Macnaughton S (2010) Food waste within food supply chains: quantification and potential for change to 2050. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 365(1554):3065–3081

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Pearson K (2008) Market statistics and future trends in global packaging. Report. http://www.worldpackaging.org/publications/documents/market-statistics.pdf. Accessed 29 Jan 2014

  51. PR Newswire (2016) Food packaging market. http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/food-packaging-market-expected-to-grow-at-4-cagr-to-2019-534879911.html. Accessed 19 Mar 2016

  52. Rigamonti L, Grosso M, Møller J, Sanchez VM, Magnani S, Christensen TH (2014) Environmental evaluation of plastic waste management scenarios. Resour Conserv Recycl 85:42–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Rooney I, Virtanen-Leppä T, Sievänen T (2007) Pakkaussuunnittelu (in Finnish–Package design). Toimiva Pakkaus, Järvi-Kääriäinen T, Ollila M (eds) Pakkaustutkimus—PTR ry Helsinki, pp 32–49

  54. Rundh B (2009) Packaging design: creating competitive advantage with product packaging. Br Food J 111(9):988–1002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Scott L, Vigar-Ellis D (2014) Consumer understanding, perceptions and behaviours with regard to environmentally friendly packaging in a developing nation. Int J Consumer Stud 38(6):642–649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Silberbauer A, Schmid M (2017) Packaging concepts for ready-to-eat food: recent progress. J Packag Technol Res 1:113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41783-017-0019-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Singh A, Khamrai M, Samanta S, Kumari K, Kundu PP (2018a) Microbial, physicochemical, and sensory analyses-based shelf life appraisal of white fresh cheese packaged into PET waste-based active packaging film. J Packag Technol Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41783-018-0034-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Singh S, Kumar J, Rao PVM (2018) Parameters for environmental impact assessment of product packaging: a Delphi study. J Packag Technol Res 2(1):3–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Sohrabpour V, Oghazi P, Olsson A (2016) An improved supplier driven packaging design and development method for supply chain efficiency. J Packag Technol Res 29(3):161–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. SPC (2014) Sustainable packaging coalition. http://www.sustainablepackaging.org/content. Accessed 12 Mar 2017

  61. Spiral Foundation (2016) The SPIRAL foundation: a non-profit humanitarian organization. http://www.spiralfoundation.org/. Accessed 26 Nov 2016

  62. Subramanian RP (2008) Towards Cleaner Technologies: a process story in the Firozabad glass industry cluster. The Energy and Resources Institute (TERI)

  63. Sundaram M (2014) Mixed plastics film laminate recycling—need of the hour. Gurgaon

  64. Sung K, Cooper T, Kettley S (2014). Individual upcycling practice: Exploring the possible determinants of upcycling based on a literature review. In: Sustainable Innovation. Denmark

  65. Svanes E, Vold M, Møller H, Pettersen MK, Larsen H, Hanssen OJ (2010) Sustainable packaging design: a holistic methodology for packaging design. Packag Technol Sci 23(3):161–175

    Google Scholar 

  66. Tetra Pak (2015) Protect What’s Good for the environment—TetraPak® Recycling. http://www.tetrapakrecycling.co.uk/index.asp. Accessed 15 Mar 2017

  67. Toniolo S, Mazzi A, Niero M, Zuliani F, Scipioni A (2013) Comparative LCA to evaluate how much recycling is environmentally favourable for food packaging. Resour Conserv Recycl 77:61–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Trudel R, Argo JJ (2013) The effect of product size and form distortion on consumer recycling behavior. J Consumer Res 40(4):632–643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Trudel R, Argo JJ, Meng MD (2016) Trash or recycle? How product distortion leads to categorization error during disposal. Env Behav 48(7):966–985

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. United Nations Publications (2015) Guidelines for national waste management strategies: Moving from challenges to opportunities. UN

  71. USEPA (2014) Municipal solid waste generation, recycling, and disposal in the United States: facts and figures for 2012. United States Environmental Protection Agency

  72. Verghese KL, Horne R, Carre A (2010) PIQET: the design and development of an online ‘streamlined’ LCA tool for sustainable packaging design decision support. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15(6):608–620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Verghese K, Lewis H, Lockrey S, Williams H (2015) Packaging’s role in minimizing food loss and waste across the supply chain. Packag Technol Sci 28(7):603–620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Verghese K, Lewis H, Fitzpatrick L (2012) Packaging for sustainability. Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  75. Verghese K, Lewis H, Lockrey S, Williams H (2013) The role of packaging in minimising food waste in the supply chain of the future. RMIT University, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  76. Welle F (2011) Twenty years of PET bottle to bottle recycling—an overview. Resour Conserv Recycl 55(11):865–875

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Wever R, Van Onselen L, Silvester S, Boks C (2010) Influence of packaging design on littering and waste behaviour. Packag Technol Sci 23(5):239–252

    Google Scholar 

  78. Wever R, Vogtländer J (2013) Eco-efficient value creation: an alternative perspective on packaging and sustainability. Packag Technol Sci 26(4):229–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Wikström F, Williams H (2010) Potential environmental gains from reducing food losses through development of new packaging—a life-cycle model. Packag Technol Sci 23(7):403–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Wikström F, Williams H, Verghese K, Clune S (2014) The influence of packaging attributes on consumer behaviour in food-packaging life cycle assessment studies-a neglected topic. J Clean Prod 73:100–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Williams H, Wikström F (2011) Environmental impact of packaging and food losses in a life cycle perspective: a comparative analysis of five food items. J Clean Prod 19(1):43–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Williams H, Wikström F, Otterbring T, Löfgren M, Gustafsson A (2012) Reasons for household food waste with special attention to packaging. J Clean Prod 24:141–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Wollny V, Dehoust G, Fritsche UR, Weinem P (2001) Comparison of plastic packaging waste management options: feedstock recycling versus energy recovery in Germany. J Ind Ecol 5(3):49–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. World Economic Outlook (2013) World Economic Outlook: hopes, realities, risks. International Monetary Fund, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  85. Zampori L, Dotelli G (2014) Design of a sustainable packaging in the food sector by applying LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19(1):206–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Social Innovation Lab, PDPM IIITDM Jabalpur, Dumna Airport Road, Jabalpur, 482001, Madhya Pradesh, India

    Amaltas Khan

  2. Sanjeev Bhargava Core Lab Complex, PDPM IIITDM Jabalpur, Dumna Airport Road, Jabalpur, 482001, Madhya Pradesh, India

    Puneet Tandon

Authors
  1. Amaltas Khan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Puneet Tandon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Puneet Tandon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khan, A., Tandon, P. Realizing the End-of-life Considerations in the Design of Food Packaging. J Package Technol Res 2, 251–263 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41783-018-0041-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41783-018-0041-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation