Reduction of Mercury Accumulation in Carp Tissues (Cyprinus carpio L.) by Natural Organic Matter and Chlorides

  • Petra Vičarová
  • Hana Dočekalová
  • Eva Poštulková
  • Jan Mareš
  • Radovan Kopp
  • Pavlína Pelcová
Research paper
  • 18 Downloads

Abstract

In natural waters and in breeding tanks certain substances are naturally present in the water or deliberately added to it. Some of these substances are characterized by the formation of strong complexes with mercury and thus they can reduce the intake of mercury by aquatic organisms. The accumulation of mercury in six selected tissues (skin, scales, kidneys, muscle, liver and gills) of Cyprinus carpio L. in the presence of humic acid and sodium chloride was studied. Carp fingerlings were exposed in fish tanks for 3 days to the bulk solution containing a defined concentration of Hg2+ (1.5 μg/l) and increasing concentration of humic acid (0–5 mg/l) and chloride ions (18–600 mg/l). The fish were not fed during the experiment and mercury accumulated in the carp tissues from fish tank water only. Total mercury content in water and in selected tissues was determined by the atomic absorption spectrometer AMA 254. Increased concentration of both humic acid and sodium chloride caused reduction of mercury accumulation in carp tissues up to 93 and 45%, respectively.

Keywords

Common carp Humic acid 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was financially supported by Project No. QJ1210013 National Agency for Agricultural, Ministry of Agriculture Czech Republic.

References

  1. Alhashemi AH, Sekhavatjou MS, Kiabi BH, Karbassi AR (2012) Bioaccumulation of trace elements in water, sediment, and six fish species from a freshwater wetland, Iran. Microchem J 104:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen P (1994) Accumulation profiles of lead and the influence of cadmium and mercury in Oreochromis aureus (Steindacher) during chronic exponsure. Toxicol Environ Chem 44:101–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ardakani SS, Jafari SM (2014) Assessment of heavy metals (Cu, Pb and Zn) in different tissues of common carp (Cyprinus carpio) caught from Shirinsu Wetland, Western Iran. J Chem Heal Ris 4:47–54Google Scholar
  4. Block M, Pärt P, Glynn AW (1997) Influcence of water quality on the accumulation of methyl 203Mercury in gill tissues of Minnow (Phoxinus phoxinus). Comp Biochem Physiol 118:197–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Celechovska O, Svobodova Z, Zlabek V, Macharackova B (2007) Distribution of metals in tissues of the common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.). Acta Vet Brno 76:93–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cervený D, Zlabek V, Velisek J, Turek J, Grabic R, Grabicova K, Fedorova G, Rosmus J, Lepic P, Randak T (2014) Contamination of fish in important fishing grounds of the Czech Republic. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 109:101–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clesceri LS, Greenberg AE, Eaton AD (1998) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 20th edn. American Public Health Association Inc., Washington D.C., USAGoogle Scholar
  8. Dutton J, Fisher NS (2012) Influence of humic acid on the uptake of aqueous metals by the killifish (Fundulus heteroclitus). Environ Toxicol Chem 31:2225–2232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fernandez-Gomez C, Bayona JM, Diez S (2015) Diffusive gradients in thin film for predicting methylmercury bioavailability in freshwaters after photodegradation. Chemosphere 131:184–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ghosh D, Mandal DK (2012) Histopathological effects and bioaccumulation of mercury in the kidney of an Indian Major Carp, Labeo rohita (Hamilton). Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 89:479–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Guo L, Hunt BJ, Santschi PH, Ray SM (2001) Effect of dissolved organic matter on the uptake of trace metals by American oysters. Environ Sci Technol 35:885–893CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kensova R, Celechovska O, Doubravova J, Svobodova Z (2010) Concentration of metals in tissues of fish from the věstonice reserovoir. Acta Vet Brno 79:335–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Luider CD, Crusius J, Playle RC, Curtis PJ (2004) Influence of natural organic matter source on copper speciation as demonstrated by Cu binding to fish gills, by ion selective electrode, and by DGT gel sampler. Environ Sci Technol 38:2865–2872CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mieiro CL, Pacheco M, Pereira ME, Duarte AC (2009) Mercury distribution in key tissues of fish (Liza aurata) inhabiting a contaminated estuary—implications for human and ecosystem health risk assessment. J Environ Monit 11:1004–1012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ravichandran M (2004) Interactions between mercury and dissolved organic matter—a review. Chemosphere 55:319–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Sari M, Tuzen M (2009) Biosorptive removal of mercury(II) from aqueous solution using lichen (Xanthoparmelia conspersa) biomass: kinetic and equilibrium studies Original Research Article. J Hazard Mater 169(1–3):263–270Google Scholar
  17. Seline NE (2009) Global biochemical cycling of mercury: a review. Annu Rev Env Resour 34:43–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Spehar RL, Christensen GM, Curtis C, Lemke AE, Norbert TJ, Pickering QH (1998) Effects of pollution on freshwater fish. J Water Pollut Control Fed 54:877–922Google Scholar
  19. Spurny P, Mares J, Hedbavny J, Sukop I (2002) Heavy metal distribution in the ecosystems of the upper course Jihlava River. Czech J Anim Sci 47:160–167Google Scholar
  20. Svobodova Z, Vykusova B, Machova J, Bastl J, Hrbkova M, Svobodnik J (1993) Monitoring of foreign substances in fishes from the Jizera River in the Otradovice locality. Bull VURH Vodňany Czech Repub 29:28–42Google Scholar
  21. Svobodova Z, Piacka V, Vykusova B, Machova J, Hejtmanek M, Hrbkova M, Bastl J (1995) Residues of pollutants in siluriformes from various localities of the Czech Republic. Acta Vet Brno 64:195–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Svobodova Z, Zlabek V, Celechovska O, Randak T, Machova J, Kolarova J (2002) Content of metals in tissues of marketable common carp and in bottom sediments of selected ponds of South and West Bohemia. Czech J Anim Sci 47:339–350Google Scholar
  23. Svobodova Z, Celechovska O, Kolarova J, Randak T, Zlabek V (2004) Assessment of metal contamination in the upper reaches of the Tichá Orlice River. Czech J Anim Sci 49:458–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Svobodova Z, Kolarova J, Navratil S, Vesely T, Chloupek P, Tesarcik J, Citek J (2007) Nemoci sladkovodnich a akvarijnich ryb. Informatorium, Czech RepublicGoogle Scholar
  25. Syversen T, Kaur P (2012) The toxicology of mercury and its compounds. J Trace Elem Med Biol 26:215–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Taravati S, Sary AA, Baboli MJ (2012) Determination of lead, mercury and cadmium in wild and farmed Barbus sharpeyi from Shadegan wetland and Azadegan aquaculture site, South of Iran. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 89:78–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Tuzen M, Karaman I, Citak D, Soylak M (2009a) Mercury(II) and methyl mercury determinations in water and fish samples by using solid phase extraction and cold vapour atomic absorption spectrometry combination. Food Chem Toxicol 47(7):1648–1652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Tuzen M, Uluozlu OD, Karaman I, Soylak M (2009b) Mercury(II) and methyl mercury speciation on Streptococcus pyogenes loaded Dowex Optipore SD-2. J Hazard Mater 169(1–3):345–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Tuzen M, Sari A, Mendel D, Soylak M (2009c) Removal of mercury(II) from aqueous solution using moss (Drepanocladus revolvens) biomass: equilibrium, thermodynamic and kinetic studies Original Research Article. J Hazard Mater 171(1–3):500–507Google Scholar
  30. Velcheva IG (2006) Zinc content in the organs and tissues of freshwater fish from the Kardjali and Studen Kladenets Dam Lakes in Bulgaria. Turk J Zool 30:1–7Google Scholar
  31. Visnjic-Jeftic Z, Jaric IL, Skoric S (2010) Heavy metal and trace element accumulation in muscle, liver and gills of the Pontic shad (Alosa immaculata Bennett 1835) from the Danube River (Serbia). Microchem J 95:341–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Watanabe N, Tayama M, Inouye M, Yasutake A (2012) Distribution and chemical form of mercury in commercial fish tissues. J Toxicol Sci 37:853–861CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. WHO (1991) Inorganic mercury. Environmental health criteria 118. International programme on Chemical Safety. World Health Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  34. Zhou Q, Zhang J, Fu J, Shi J, Jiang G (2008) Biomonitoring: an appealing tool for assessment of metal pollution in the aquatic ecosystem. Anal Chim Acta 606:135–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© University of Tehran 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Chemistry and BiochemistryMendel University in BrnoBrnoCzech Republic
  2. 2.Department of Zoology, Fisheries, Hydrobiology and ApicultureMendel University in BrnoBrnoCzech Republic
  3. 3.Central European Institute of TechnologyUniversity of TechnologyBrnoCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations