Academic governance is an important part of higher education (Kezar et al. 2006), and commonly takes place in meetings. Unfortunately, meeting inefficiency is widespread (Mroz et al. 2018). An academic department redesigned a day-long meeting to incorporate design thinking techniques. This qualitative study reported faculty reaction to the redesign. Recommendations are made for the design of future meetings with regard to faculty buy-in, diversity, relationships, professional development, and ongoing sustainability.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Allen, J. A., Rogelberg, S., & Scott, J. (2008). Meaningful meetings: Improve your organization’s effectiveness one meeting at a time. Quality Progress, 41, 48–53.
Angouri, J., & Marra, M. (2011). Corporate meetings as genre: a study of the role of the chair in corporate meeting talk. Text & Talk - An Interdisciplinary Journal of Language, Discourse & Communication Studies, 30(6), 615–636. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.2010.030.
Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Razavieh, A., & Sorensen, C. (2010). Introduction to research in education (8th ed). Wadsworth.
Bargh, J. A., McKenna, K. Y. A., & Fitzsimons, G. M. (2002). Can you see the real me? Activation and expression of the “true self” on the internet. Journal of Social Issues, 58(1), 33–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4560.00247.
Bernstein, M. & Ringel, R. (2018). Plan a better meeting with design thinking. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2018/02/plan-a-better-meeting-with-design-thinking.
Birnbaum, R. (2004). The end of shared governance: looking ahead or looking back. New Directions for Higher Education, 2004(127), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1002/he.152.
Brannen, M. Y., & Salk, J. E. (2000). Partnering across borders: negotiating organizational culture in a german-japanese joint venture. Human Relations, 53(4), 451–487. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726700534001.
Brown, T., & Wyatt, J. (2010). Design thinking for social innovation. Development Outreach, 12(1), 29–43.
Bryant, M., & Cox, J. W. (2006). The expression of suppression: loss and emotional labour in narratives of organisational change. Journal of Management and Organization, 12(2), 116–130.
Burke, W. W. (2017). Organization change: theory and practice. SAGE Publications.
Coyne, R. (2005). Wicked problems revisited. Design Studies, 26(1), 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2004.06.005.
Doodle.com. (2019). The state of meetings 2019. Doodle Blog website. https://en.blog.doodle.com/state-of-meetings-2019/.
Doorley, S., Holcomb, S., Klebahn, P., Segovia, K., & Utley, J. (2018). Design thinking bootleg. Hasso Plattner Institute of Design at Stanford. https://static1.squarespace.com/static/57c6b79629687fde090a0fdd/t/5b19b2f2aa4a99e99b26b6bb/1528410876119/dschool_bootleg_deck_2018_final_sm+%282%29.pdf.
Dubrovsky, V. J., Kiesler, S., & Sethna, B. N. (1991). The equalization phenomenon: Status effects in computer-mediated and face-to-face decision-making groups. Human–Computer Interaction, 6(2), 119–146. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327051hci0602_2.
Dutton, J., & Heapy, E. (Eds.). (2003). The power of high quality connections. In Positive organizational scholarship: foundations of a new discipline. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Eckel, P. D. (2006). The shifting frontiers of academic decision making: responding to new priorities, following new pathways. Greenwood Publishing Group.
Gittell, J. H. (2003). A theory of relational coordination. In K. S. Cameron, J. E. Dutton, & R. E. Quinn (Eds.), Positive organizational scholarship: foundations of a new discipline (pp. 279–295). Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Habibi, A., Sarafrazi, A., & Izadyar, S. (2014). Delphi technique theoretical framework in qualitative research. The International Journal of Engineering and Science., 3(4), 8–13.
Johansson-Sköldberg, U., Woodilla, J., & Çetinkaya, M. (2013). Design thinking: past, present and possible futures. Creativity and Innovation Management, 22(2), 121–146. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12023.
Kerr, N. L., & Tindale, R. S. (2004). Group performance and decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 55(1), 623–655. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142009.
Kezar, A., Lester, J., & Anderson, G. (2006). Challenging stereotypes that interfere with effective governance. Thought and Action, 22(2), 121–134.
Köhler, T., Cramton, C. D., & Hinds, P. J. (2012). The meeting genre across cultures: insights from three german–american collaborations. Small Group Research, 43(2), 159–185. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496411429600.
Kolko, J. (2015). Design thinking comes of age. Harvard Business Review, 93(9), 66–69.
Kramer, R. (2016a). Death by retreat. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 63(5), 3–5.
Kramer, R. (2016b). Is there such a thing as a good retreat? The Chronicle of Higher Education, 63(15), 31–34.
Kuvaas, B., Buch, R., Weibel, A., Dysvik, A., & Nerstad, C. G. L. (2017). Do intrinsic and extrinsic motivation relate differently to employee outcomes? Journal of Economic Psychology, 61, 244–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2017.05.004.
Leach, W. D. (2008). Shared governance in higher education: structural and cultural responses to a changing national climate. Available at SSRN 1520702 (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. ID 1520702). Social Science Research Network. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=1520702.
Leach, D., Rogelberg, S. G., Warr, P. B., & Burnfield, J. L. (2009). Perceived meeting effectiveness: the role of design characteristics. Journal of Business and Psychology, 24(1), 65–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-009-9092-6.
Lin, M.-F., Eichelberger, A. (2020). Transforming faculty communication and envisioning the future with design thinking. TechTrends, 63(6), 238–247.
Martin, R. L. (2017). Use design thinking to build commitment to a new idea. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2017/01/use-design-thinking-to-build-commitment-to-a-new-idea.
McLaughlan, R., & Lodge, J. M. (2019). Facilitating epistemic fluency through design thinking: a strategy for the broader application of studio pedagogy within higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 24(1), 81–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2018.1461621.
Merriam, S. B. (2002). Qualitative research in practice: examples for discussion and analysis (1st ed.). Jossey-Bass.
Micheli, P., Wilner, S. J., Bhatti, S. H., Mura, M., & Beverland, M. B. (2019). Doing design thinking: conceptual review, synthesis, and research agenda. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 36(2), 124–148.
Mroz, J. E., Allen, J. A., Verhoeven, D. C., & Shuffler, M. L. (2018). Do we really need another meeting? The science of workplace meetings. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27(6), 484–491. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721418776307.
Munter, M. (1998). Meeting technology: from low-tech to high-tech. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly, 61(2), 80–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/108056999806100210.
Olson, G. A. (2009). Exactly what is “shared governance”? The Chronicle of Higher Education. https://www.chronicle.com/article/Exactly-What-Is-Shared/47065.
Plain, C. (2007). Build an affinity for K-J method. Quality Progress, 40(3), 88.
RAND Corporation. (n.d.). Delphi method. Retrieved from https://www.rand.org/topics/delphi-method.html.
Rogelberg, S., Scott, C., & Kello, J. (2007). The science and fiction of meetings. MIT Sloan Management Review, 48(2), 18–21.
Rugg, G., & McGeorge, P. (2005). The sorting techniques: a tutorial paper on card sorts, picture sorts and item sorts. Expert Systems, 22(3), 94–107. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0394.2005.00300.x.
Saldana, J. (2015). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. SAGE.
Shanock, L. R., Allen, J. A., Dunn, A. M., Baran, B. E., Scott, C. W., & Rogelberg, S. G. (2013). Less acting, more doing: how surface acting relates to perceived meeting effectiveness and other employee outcomes. Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology, 86(4), 457–476 https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12037.
Shumski Thomas, J., Olien, J. L., Allen, J. A., Rogelberg, S. G., & Kello, J. E. (2018). Faking it for the higher-ups: status and surface acting in workplace meetings. Group & Organization Management, 43(1), 72–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601116687703.
Straus, D. (2002). How to make collaboration work: powerful ways to build consensus, solve problems, and make decisions. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Thomason, A. (2015). Professors goofing off in faculty meetings? Bingo! The Chronicle of Higher Education.
Tierney, W. G. (2008). The impact of culture on organizational decision-making: theory and practice in higher education. Stylus Publishing, LLC.
Tullis, T. S. (2007). Using closed card-sorting to evaluate information architectures. Proceedings of the Usability Professionals Association, 11–15.
Venter, E. (2017). Bridging the communication gap between generation Y and the baby boomer generation. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 22(4), 497–507. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673843.2016.1267022.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Lin, M.G., Eichelberger, A. Design Thinking as a Catalyst for Change: Faculty Reaction to a Redesigned Meeting. J Form Des Learn 4, 34–42 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41686-020-00046-2
- Case study
- Design thinking
- Faculty development
- Formative design
- Higher education
- Strategic planning
- Organizational change