Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Spatial–Temporal Distribution Characteristics of PM2.5 in China in 2016

  • Published:
Journal of Geovisualization and Spatial Analysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Air pollution in China, mainly caused by PM2.5, has become worse in recent years. Large-scale studies on spatial–temporal distribution characteristics of PM2.5 in China have been carried out. Little research was focused on nationwide China, and most previous studies have paid little attention to western China. Based on the observed PM2.5 concentration sample data in 2016 from 1445 air monitoring sites in 367 cities, our research reveals the spatial–temporal variations of PM2.5 concentrations and the possible impacting factors in China using spatial statistical and regression models. The results show that (1) PM2.5 concentrations varied hourly, daily, monthly, and seasonally. The hourly averaged values have two peaks and two valleys every day; the daily and monthly averaged values show U-shaped patterns; and the seasonal averaged values are high in winter but low in summer, with spring and autumn somewhere in between. (2) The Huanyong Line is the E–W dividing boundary between high and low pollution values in China; the Yangtze River and the second ladder dividing line in the east and west of Hu Huanyong Line are the respective S–N dividing boundaries. (3) The concentration of PM2.5 shows a significant clustering pattern in Xinjiang and the North China Plain, as the centers of the dual core of the “hot spots”. The “cold spots” consist of the southeast coastal areas, Tibet, and several other cities with good air quality. The warm temperate zones and subtropical regions are places for hot spots and cold spots, whose rankings and locations are both very sensitive to temperature. (4) China’s air quality is good in the first half of the year and becomes worse in the second half. The spatial distribution of PM2.5 concentrations mainly follows a NE–SW direction, and the air quality in North China is significantly worse than that in the south. (5) The regression relation and spatial variability of PM2.5 pattern and its impacting factors are discussed from both global and local dimensions. Overall, if the aridity index, average annual temperature, industrial GDP, and road network density increased by 1%, PM2.5 concentrations would increase by 66.9, 35.7, 29.1, and 17.4%, respectively. From a local perspective, the positive and negative influences of each impacting factor exist, and the influence differs in different geographical locations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Almond D, Chen YY, Greenstone M, Li HB (2009) Winter heating or clean air? Unintended impacts of China’s Huai River policy. Am Econ Rev 99:184–190. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.99.2.184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson A, Deng J, Du K, Zheng M, Yan C, Skold M, Gustafsson O (2015) Regionally-varying combustion sources of the January 2013 severe haze events over eastern China. Environ Sci Technol 49:2038–2043. https://doi.org/10.1021/es503855e

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balachandran S, Chang HH, Pachon JE, Holmes HA, Mulholland JA, Russell AG (2013) Bayesian-based ensemble source apportionment of PM2.5. Environ Sci Technol 47:13511–13518. https://doi.org/10.1021/es4020647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell ML, Dominici F, Ebisu K, Zeger SL, Samet JM (2007) Spatial and temporal variation in PM2.5 chemical composition in the United States for health effects studies. Environ Health Perspect 115:989

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckeridge DL, Glazier R, Harvey BJ, Escobar M, Amrhein C, Frank J (2002) Effect of motor vehicle emissions on respiratory health in an urban area. Environ Health Perspect 110:293–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan YC, Simpson RW, Mctainsh GH, Vowles PD, Cohen DD, Bailey GM (1999) Source apportionment of visibility degradation problems in Brisbane (Australia) using the multiple linear regression techniques. Atmos Environ 33:3237–3250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang D, Song Y, Liu B (2009) Visibility trends in six megacities in China 1973–2007. Atmos Res 94:161–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • David HY, Chen S-C, Zhili Z (2014) PM2.5 in China: Measurements, sources, visibility and health effects, and mitigation. Particuology 13:1–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Donkelaar A, Martin RV, Brauer M, Kahn R, Levy R, Verduzco C, Villeneuve PJ (2010) Global estimates of ambient fine particulate matter concentrations from satellite-based aerosol optical depth: development and application. Environ Health Perspect 118:847–855. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.0901623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doxseywhitfield E, Macmanus K, Adamo SB, Pistolesi L, Squires J, Borkovska O, Baptista SR (2015) Taking advantage of the improved availability of census data: a first look at the gridded population of the world, Version 4 Papers in Applied Geography 1–9

  • Filonchyk M, Yan H, Shareef TME, Yang S (2018a) Aerosol contamination survey during dust storm process in northwestern China using ground, satellite observations and atmospheric modeling data Theoretical & Applied Climatology 1–15

  • Filonchyk M, Yan H, Yang S, Lu X (2018b) Detection of aerosol pollution sources during sandstorms in northwestern China using remote sensed and model simulated data. Adv Space Res 61:1035–1046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gu C (2017) Analysis of PM_(2.5)/PM_(10) ratio in Xinjiang ambient air arid environmental monitoring

  • Gupta P, Christopher SA, Wang J, Gehrig R, Lee Y, Kumar N (2006) Satellite remote sensing of particulate matter and air quality assessment over global cities. Atmos Environ 40:5880–5892. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.03.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han X, Wei WS, Liu MZ, Hong W, Heng LU, Zhang YW (2013) The Influences of Airflow on the Concentrations of PM_(10),PM_(2.5) and PM_(1.0) in Urumqi,Xinjiang,China Journal of Desert Research

  • He Q, Huang B (2018) Satellite-based mapping of daily high-resolution ground PM 2.5 in China via space-time regression modeling. Remote Sens Environ 206:72–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu H (1935) Distribution of population in China—with statistical tables and density charts. Acta Geograph Sin:33–74

  • Ikenson DJ (2008) China’s energy woes far eastern economic review

  • Jerrett M, Burnett RT, Ma R, Pope CA III, Krewski D, Newbold KB, Thurston G, Shi Y, Finkelstein N, Calle EE, Thun MJ (2005) Spatial analysis of air pollution and mortality in Los Angeles. Epidemiology 16:727–736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karaca F, Alagha O, Ertürk F (2005) Statistical characterization of atmospheric PM and PM2.5 concentrations at a non-impacted suburban site of Istanbul, Turkey. Chemosphere 59:1183–1190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kay S, Zhao B, Sui D (2015) Can social media clear the air? A case study of the air pollution problem in Chinese cities. Prof Geogr 67:351–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kent J, Leitner M (2007) Efficacy of standard deviational ellipses in the application of criminal geographic profiling. J Investig Psychol Offender Profiling 4:147–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar N (2010) What can affect AOD-PM(2.5) association? Environ Health Perspect 118:A 109–A 110; author reply A 110–111. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.0901732

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar M, Raju MP, Singh RK, Singh AK, Singh RS, Banerjee T (2016) Wintertime characteristics of aerosols over middle Indo-Gangetic Plain: vertical profile. Atmos Res 183:268–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee SJ, Serre ML, van Donkelaar A, Martin RV, Burnett RT, Jerrett M (2012) Comparison of geostatistical interpolation and remote sensing techniques for estimating long-term exposure to ambient PM2.5 concentrations across the continental United States. Environ Health Perspect 120:1727–1732. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1205006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levy RC, Remer LA, Mattoo S, Vermote EF, Kaufman YJ (2007) Second-generation operational algorithm: retrieval of aerosol properties over land from inversion of moderate resolution imaging spectroradiometer spectral reflectance. J Geophys Res-Atmos 112:319–321. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006jd007811

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li XK, Zhang CR, Li WD, Liu K (2017) Evaluating the use of DMSP/OLS nighttime light imagery in predicting PM2.5 concentrations in the northeastern United States. Remote Sens 9:620. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9060620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu YY, Jun-Cheng LI, Mathematics DO (2016) Comparison study of spatial interpolation method of PM_(2.5) concentration in the atmosphere of changsha city administration & technique of environmental monitoring

  • Ma Z (2015) Study on spatiotemporal characteristics of PM2.5 in China using satellite remote sensing. Nanjing University

  • Marek K (2010) Assessment of hydrogeology recognition on the example selected area of pomerania lakeland—Bory tucholskie. Biuletyn - Panstwowego Instytutu Geologicznego 89–94

  • Melecky L (2015) Spatial autocorrelation method for local analysis of the EU. Procedia Economics & Finance 23:1102–1109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mijić ZR, Lazić LA, Rajšić SF, Tasić MD, Novaković VT 2007 Some characteristic air back trajectories for high PM10 and PM2.5 concentration episodes in Belgrade. In. pp 741–741

  • Myung-Hee JO (2015) Health assessment of the Nakdong River basin aquatic ecosystems utilizing GIS and spatial statistics. Journal of the Korean Association of Geographic Information Studies 18:174–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neumann-Hauf G, Halbritter G (1982) Site and season-specific variations of the atmospheric pollutant transport and deposition on the local and regional scale. Sci Total Environ 23:91–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paciorek CJ, Liu Y (2009) Limitations of remotely sensed aerosol as a spatial proxy for fine particulate matter. Environ Health Perspect 117:904–909. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.0800360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Querol X et al (2001) PM10 and PM2.5 source apportionment in the Barcelona Metropolitan area, Catalonia, Spain. Atmos Environ 35:6407–6419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson MS, Chavez J, Velazquez S, Jayanty RK (2004) Chemical speciation of PM2.5 collected during prescribed fires of the Coconino National Forest near Flagstaff, Arizona. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 54:1112–1123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rockstrom J et al (2009) Planetary boundaries: exploring the safe operating space for humanity. Ecol Soc 14:292–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rohde RA, Muller RA (2015) Air pollution in China: mapping of concentrations and sources. PLoS One 10:e0135749

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott LM, Janikas MV (2010) Spatial statistics in ArcGIS handbook of Applied Spatial Analysis 27–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Shao M, Tang XY, Zhang YH, Li WJ (2006) City clusters in China: air and surface water pollution. Front Ecol Environ 4:353–361. https://doi.org/10.1890/1540-9295(2006)004[0353:Ccicaa]2.0.Co;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tianmo Z, Qiang F, Yunqiang Z, Zhuowei H, Fei Y (2013) Research on the application of spatial autocorrelation method in environmental pollution. Bulletin of Surveying and Mapping 53–56

  • Tobler WR (1970) A computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit region. Econ Geogr 46:234–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vardoulakis S, Fisher BEA, Pericleous K, Gonzalez-Flesca N (2003) Modelling air quality in street canyons: a review. Atmos Environ 37:155–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(02)00857-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Z, Fang C, Xu G, Pan Y (2015a) Spatial-temporal characteristics of the PM2.5 in China in 2014. Acta Geographica Sinica 70:1720–1734. https://doi.org/10.11821/dlxb201511003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Z, Zhang X, Xu B (2015b) Spatio-temporal features of China’s urban fires&58; an investigation with reference to gross domestic product and humidity. Sustainability 7:9734–9752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xie Y, Zhao B, Zhang L, Luo R (2015) Spatiotemporal variations of PM 2.5 and PM 10 concentrations between 31 Chinese cities and their relationships with SO 2, NO 2, CO and O 3. Particuology 20:141–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu G, Jiao L, Zhao S, Cheng J (2016) Spatial and temporal variability of PM2.5 concentration in China Wuhan University. Journal of Natural Sciences 21:358–368

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang B (2014) Study on population distribution pattern at the county level of China Northwest Population Journal:33–36

  • Zhao D, Wei J (2006) A Comparatwe study on the cornerstone industries of clunese large and middle cities science of science and management of S&T 27:93–97

  • Zhao X, Chao GU, Yang H, Wang J, Yang W, Wang X, Bai Z (2017) Chemical composition and source apportionment of PM_(2.5) during a winter air pollution episode in the Kui-Du-Wu Area of Xinjiang Uygur autonomous region research of environmental sciences

  • Zheng Y, Liu F, Hsieh HP 2013 U-air: when urban air quality inference meets big data. In: ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. pp 1436–1444

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qingwu Yan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huang, Y., Yan, Q. & Zhang, C. Spatial–Temporal Distribution Characteristics of PM2.5 in China in 2016. J geovis spat anal 2, 12 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41651-018-0019-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41651-018-0019-5

Keywords

Navigation