Journal of Well-Being Assessment

, Volume 2, Issue 1, pp 75–89 | Cite as

Validation of the Flourishing Scale for Married Employees in the Information Technology-Enabled Services Sector in India

  • Rajesh PremchandranEmail author
  • Pushpendra Priyadarshi
Original Research


The Flourishing Scale (FS) created by Diener et al., Social Indicators Research, 97, 143–156 (2010) is a measurement that assesses eudaimonic well-being in terms of psychological functioning. In this study, the psychometric properties of the scale were explored by using three Indian samples (I: n = 262; II: n = 347; III: n = 508) each comprising of married individuals belonging to the Information Technology/Information Technology Enabled Services (IT/ITES) sector. Reliability analysis and a multigroup confirmatory factorial analysis (MGCFA) were carried out on the FS, and the validity was examined by analyzing their correlations with other measures of well-being. Results showed adequate psychometric properties for the scale, and convergent validity with subjective well-being measures. Results also demonstrated the unidimensional structure of the FS corroborating earlier findings. The MGCFA of the scale evidenced an invariant structure. In conclusion, the FS behaved consistently with the original study by Diener et al. and was found to be appropriate for use in assessing eudaimonic well-being among service sector employees in India. Further, due to its short length, the survey may be leveraged to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions of well-being programs by HR practitioners and may also be used in future studies on well-being.


Psychological well-being Flourishing Eudaimonia Satisfaction India Validation 


  1. Agneessens, F., & Wittek, R. (2008). Social capital and employee well-being: Disentangling intrapersonal and interpersonal selection and influence mechanisms. Revue Française de Sociologie, 49(3), 613–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahuja, M. K., Chudoba, K. M., Kacmar, C. J., McKnight, D. H., & George, J. F. (2007). IT road warriors: Balancing work-family conflict, job autonomy, and work overload to mitigate turnover intentions. MIS Quarterly, 31(1), 17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alagaraja, M., McLean, G., Munn, S. L., & Chaudhuri, S. (2016). Work–life balance: A cross-cultural review of dual-earner couples in India and the United States. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 18, 54–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16, 74–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bhatnagar, J. (2007). Talent management strategy of employee engagement in Indian ITES employees: Key to retention. Employee Relations, 29, 640–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Budhwar, P. S., Luthar, H. K., & Bhatnagar, J. (2006). The dynamics of HRM systems in Indian BPO firms. Journal of Labor Research, 27, 339–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Busseri, M. A. (2015). Toward a resolution of the tripartite structure of subjective well-being. Journal of Personality, 83(4), 413–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cammann, C., Fichman, M., Jenkins, G. J., & Klesh, J. (1983). Assessing the attitudes and perceptions of organizational members. In S. Seashore, E. Lawler III, P. Mirvis, & C. Cammann (Eds.), Assessing organizational change: A guide to methods, measures, and practices (pp. 71–138). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  9. Chen, F. F., Jing, Y., Hayes, A., & Lee, J. M. (2013). Two concepts or two approaches? A bifactor analysis of psychological and subjective well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14(3), 1033–1068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper Perennial Modern Classics.Google Scholar
  11. Cummins, R. A., Gullone, E., & Lau, A. L. (2002). A model of subjective well-being homeostasis: The role of personality. In The universality of subjective wellbeing indicators (pp. 7–46). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  12. Cunningham, W. A., Preacher, K. J., & Banaji, M. R. (2001). Implicit attitude measures: Consistency, stability, and convergent validity. Psychological Science, 12(2), 163–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Davern, M. T., Cummins, R. A., & Stokes, M. A. (2007). Subjective wellbeing as an affective-cognitive construct. Journal of Happiness Studies, 8(4), 429–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dhar, R. L., & Dhar, M. (2010). Job stress, coping process and intentions to leave: A study of information technology professionals working in India. The Social Science Journal, 47, 560–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Diener, E., & Lucas, R. (1999). Personality and subjective well-being. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: Foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 213–229). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  16. Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Diener, E., Wirtz, D., Tov, W., Kim-Prieto, C., Choi, D., Oishi, S., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2010). New well-being measures: Short scales to assess flourishing and positive and negative feelings. Social Indicators Research, 97, 143–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Diener, E., Tay, L., & Oishi, S. (2013). Rising income and the subjective well-being of nations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(2), 267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Disabato, D. J., Goodman, F. R., Kashdan, T. B., Short, J. L., & Jarden, A. (2016). Different types of well-being? A cross-cultural examination of hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Psychological Assessment, 28, 471–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dunn, M. G., & O'brien, K. M. (2013). Work–family enrichment among dual-earner couples: Can work improve our family life? Journal of Ccounseling Psychology, 60(4), 634.Google Scholar
  21. Easterlin, R. A. (1974). Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence. In P. A. David & M. W. Reder (Eds.), Nations and households in economic growth (pp. 89–125). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  22. Esch, T., Jose, G., Gimpel, C., & Michalsen, A. (2013). Die Flourishing Scale (FS) von Diener et al. liegt jetzt in einer autorisierten deutschen Fassung (FS-D) vor: Einsatz bei einer Mind-Body-medizinischen Fragestellung. Complementary Medicine Research, 20, 267–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fisher, J. W., Francis, L. J., & Johnson, P. (2000). Assessing spiritual health via four domains of spiritual wellbeing: The SH4DI. Pastoral Psychology, 49(2), 133–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gambhirananda, S. (1986). Taittiriya upanishad. Calcutta: Advaita Ashrama.Google Scholar
  26. Gefen, D., & Straub, D. (2005). A practical guide to factorial validity using PLS-Graph: Tutorial and annotated example. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 16.
  27. Goldberg, D., & Williams, P. (2000). General Health Questionnaire (GHQ). Swindon, Wiltshire, UK: NFER Nelson.Google Scholar
  28. Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (2006). Multivariate data analysis. Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  29. Hattie, J. (1985). Methodology review: Assessing unidimensionality of tests and items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 9(2), 139–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hone, L. C., Jarden, A., Schofield, G. M., & Duncan, S. (2014a). Measuring flourishing: The impact of operational definitions on the prevalence of high levels of wellbeing. International Journal of Wellbeing, 4(1), 62–90. Scholar
  31. Hone, L., Jarden, A., & Schofield, G. (2014b). Psychometric properties of the flourishing scale in a New Zealand sample. Social Indicators Research, 119, 1031–1045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Howell, A. J., & Buro, K. (2015). Measuring and predicting student well-being: further evidence in support of the flourishing scale and the scale of positive and negative experiences. Social Indicators Research, 121(3), 903–915.Google Scholar
  33. Huta, V. (2013). Pursuing eudaimonia versus hedonia: Distinctions, similarities, and relationships. In A. S. Waterman (Ed.), The best within us: Positive psychology perspectives on eudaimonic functioning (pp. 139–158). Washington DC: APA Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Huta, V., & Ryan, R. M. (2010). Pursuing pleasure or virtue: The differential and overlapping well-being benefits of hedonic and eudaimonic motives. Journal of Happiness Studies, 11, 735–762. Scholar
  35. Huta, V., & Waterman, A. S. (2014). Eudaimonia and its distinction from hedonia: Developing a classification and terminology for understanding conceptual and operational definitions. Journal of Happiness Studies, 15, 1425–1456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Indian Brand Equity Foundation (2017). Indian Brand Equity Foundation Report. Accessed 10 July 2017.
  37. Jöreskog, K. G. (1971). Simultaneous factor analysis in several populations. Psychometrika, 36, 409–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Keeney, J., Boyd, E. M., Sinha, R., Westring, A. F., & Ryan, A. M. (2013). From “work–family” to “work–life”: Broadening our conceptualization and measurement. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 82(3), 221–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Cook, W. L. (2006). Analyzing mixed independent variables: The actorpartner interdependence model. Dyadic Ddata Analysis, 144–184.Google Scholar
  40. Keyes, C. L. M. (2002). The mental health continuum: From languishing to flourishing in life. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 43, 207–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Khodarahimi, S. (2013). Hope and flourishing in an Iranian adults sample: Their contributions to the positive and negative emotions. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 8, 361–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Krishnan, S. K., & Singh, M. (2010). Outcomes of intention to quit of Indian IT professionals. Human Resource Management, 49(3), 421–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Mortenson, S. T. (2002). Sex, communication values, and cultural values: Individualism-collectivism as a mediator of sex differences in communication values in two cultures. Communication Reports, 15(1), 57–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Page, K. M., & Vella-Brodrick, D. A. (2013). The working for wellness program: RCT of an employee well-being intervention. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14(3), 1007–1031.Google Scholar
  45. Pavlou, P. A., Liang, H., & Xue, Y. (2007). Understanding and mitigating uncertainty in online exchange relationships: A principal-agent perspective. MIS Quarterly, 31, 105–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Perrow, C. (1986). Economic theories of organization. Theory and Society, 15(1–2), 11–45.Google Scholar
  47. Peterson, C., Seligman, M. E., & Vaillant, G. E. (1988). Pessimistic explanatory style is a risk factor for physical illness: A thirty-five-year longitudinal study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55(1), 23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Ployhart, R. E., & Vandenberg, R. J. (2010). Longitudinal research: The theory, design, and analysis of change. Journal of Management, 36, 94–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Radhakrishnan, S. (1992). The Hindu dharma. International Journal of Ethics, 33, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 141–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 1069–1081.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Ryff, C. D., & Keyes, C. L. M. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 719–727. Scholar
  53. Ryff, C. D., & Singer, B. (1998). The contours of positive human health. Psychological Inquiry, 9, 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Ryff, C. D., & Singer, B. H. (2008). Know thyself and become what you are: A eudaimonic approach to psychological well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9(1), 13–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Scheier, M., Carver, C., & Bridges, M. (2001). Optimism, pessimism, and psychological well-being. In E. C. Chang (Ed.), Optimism & pessimism: Implications for theory, research, and practice (pp. 189–216). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sears, C. R., Newman, K. R., Ference, J. D., & Thomas, C. L. (2011). Attention to emotional images in previously depressed individuals: An eye-tracking study. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 35(6), 517–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Seligman, M. E. P. (2002). Positive psychology, positive prevention, and positive therapy. In C. R. Snyder & S. J. Lopez (Eds.). Handbook of positive psychology, (pp. 3-9). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Seligman, M. E., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology. An introduction. The American Psychologist, 55, 5–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Seligman, M. E., Steen, T. A., Park, N., & Peterson, C. (2005). Positive psychology progress: Empirical validation of interventions. American Psychologist, 60(5), 410.Google Scholar
  60. Sheldon, K. M., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2012). The challenge of staying happier: Testing the hedonic adaptation prevention model. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(5), 670–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Silva, A. J., & Caetano, A. (2013). Validation of the flourishing scale and scale of positive and negative experience in Portugal. Social Indicators Research, 110, 469–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Singh, A. (2010). The effect of family background on individual wages and an examination of inequality of opportunity in India. Journal of Labor Research, 31, 230–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Singh, K., Junnarkar, M., & Jaswal, S. (2016). Validating the flourishing scale and the scale of positive and negative experience in India. Mental Health, Religion and Culture, 19, 943–954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Sinha, J. B. P., & Sinha, D. (1990). Role of social values in Indian organizations. International Journal of Psychology, 25, 705–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Steenkamp, J. E. B. M., & van Trijp, J. C. M. (1991). The use of LISREL in validating marketing constructs. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 8, 283–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Sumi, K. (2014). Reliability and validity of Japanese versions of the flourishing scale and the scale of positive and negative experience. Social Indicators Research, 118, 601–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Tang, X., Duan, W., Wang, Z., & Liu, T. (2016). Psychometric evaluation of the simplified Chinese version of flourishing scale. Research on Social Work Practice, 26, 591–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124–1131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Upadhya, C., & Vasavi, A. (2006). Work, culture, and sociality in the Indian IT Industry: A sociological study (final report submitted to the IDPAD). Bangalore: National Institute of advanced studies. Accessed 10 June 2017.
  70. Vaid, M. (2009). Exploring the lives of youth in the BPO sector: Findings from a study in Gurgaon. Issue 10 of working paper (health and population innovation fellowship programme). New Delhi: Population Council.Google Scholar
  71. Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 4–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Wang, I. M., Sinclair, R. R., & Tetrick, L. E. (2012). How to think about and measure psychological well-being. In M. Wang, R. R. Sinclair, & I. E. Tetric (Eds.), Research methods in occupational health psychology. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  73. Waterman, A. S. (1993). Two conceptions of happiness: Contrasts of personal expressiveness (eudaimonia) and hedonic enjoyment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 678–691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Waterman, A. S. (2007). On the importance of distinguishing hedonia and eudaimonia when contemplating the hedonic treadmill. The American Psychologist, 62, 612–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Waterman, A. S., Schwartz, S. J., & Conti, R. (2008). The implications of two conceptions of happiness (hedonic enjoyment and eudaimonia) for the understanding of intrinsic motivation. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9, 41–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Waterman, A. S., Schwartz, S. J., Zamboanga, B. L., Ravert, R. D., Williams, M. K., Agocha, V. B., … Donnellan, M. B. (2010). The questionnaire for eudaimonic well-being: Psychometric properties, demographic comparisons, and evidence of validity. Journal of Positive Psychology, 5, 41–61.Google Scholar
  77. Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Indian Institute of ManagementLucknowIndia

Personalised recommendations