Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

General, Health-Specific, and Housing-Specific Self-Efficacy Scales: Preliminary Reliability and Validity Evidence with Homeless or Vulnerably Housed Adults

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of Well-Being Assessment

A Publisher Correction to this article was published on 01 April 2018

This article has been updated

Abstract

Self-efficacy (SE) refers to one’s sense of personal competence and is a key element of human agency. Among individuals who are homeless or vulnerably housed, SE has the potential to provide important information about an individual’s ability to seek out and make use of resources and persevere in the face of multiple challenges. SE is understudied as a personal variable in research with homeless samples. Thus, it is important to identify appropriate measures of general and domain-specific SE for this population and evaluate their psychometric properties. Three relevant SE scales are the Generalized Self Efficacy Scale, Perceived Health Competence Scale, and Housing Self-Efficacy Scale. The purposes of this study were to examine the internal structure and score reliability for each of these SE scales, report performance on and intercorrelations among the SE scales, and examine the relationship of demographic variables to SE scale scores, with a sample of adults who were homeless or vulnerably housed. Strict unidimensionality was evaluated using confirmatory factor analysis. Model fit was examined using fit indices and residual polychoric correlation matrices. Essential unidimensionality was evaluated using exploratory factor analysis and the ratio of first to second eigenvalues. Internal consistency estimates of reliability were obtained using ordinal alpha. None of the SE measures were found to be strictly unidimensional but all three measures were found to be essentially unidimensional. This finding supported the use of total scores for each measure. Ordinal alphas ranged from .87 to .93 for the three SE measures and thus were satisfactory. Correlations among the three measures ranged from .36 to .45. Demographic variables showed little relationship to the three SE measures. The study findings provided initial psychometric evidence to support the use of these three SE measures with a homeless or vulnerably housed adult sample.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 06 July 2018

    Due to some technical problem related with rendering of online issue 3, the below articles need to be read as part of Vol. 1, multiple Issue 1-3

Notes

  1. Henceforth referred to as the Standards.

  2. Over the course of the longitudinal study, many participants cycled between homeless and vulnerably housed states, thus this status is more relevant to the recruitment process.

References

  • American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. [AERA, APA, & NCME]. (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. [AERA, APA, & NCME]. (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandalos, D. L. (2014). Relative performance of categorical diagonally weighted least squares and robust maximum likelihood estimation. Structural Equation Modeling, 21, 102–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2014.859510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1986). The explanatory and predictive scope of self-efficacy theory. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 4, 359–373. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.1986.4.3.359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1989). Human agency in social cognitive theory. The American Psychologist, 44, 1175–1184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (2000). Self-efficacy: The foundation of agency. In W. J. Perrig, A. Grob, W. J. Perrig, & A. Grob (Eds.), Control of human behavior, mental processes, and consciousness: Essays in honor of the 60th birthday of august Flammer (pp. 17–33). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. In F. Pajares & T. C. Urdan (Eds.), Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents (pp. 307–337). USA: Information Age Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benston, E. A. (2015). Housing programs for homeless individuals with mental illness: Effects on housing and mental health outcomes. Psychiatric Services, 66, 806–816. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.201400294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Bijl, J. J., & Shortridge-Baggett, L. M. (2001). The theory and measurement of the self-efficacy construct. Scholarly Inquiry for Nursing Practice, 15, 189–207.

  • Bonetti, D., Johnston, M., Rodriguez-marin, J., Pastor, M., Martin-aragon, M., Doherty, E., & Sheehan, K. (2001). Dimensions of perceived control: A factor analysis of three measures and an examination of their relation to activity level and mood in a student and cross-cultural patient sample. Psychology & Health, 16, 655-674, https://doi.org/10.1080/08870440108405865.

  • Bornstein, M. H., Davidson, L., Keyes, C. L. M., & Moore, K. A. (2003). Well-being: Positive development across the life course. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broadhead-Fearn, D., & White, K. M. (2006). The role of self-efficacy in predicting rule-following behaviors in homeless youth: A test of the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Social Psychology, 146, 307–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R. T., Miao, Y., Mitchell, S. L., Bharel, M., Patel, M., Ard, K. L., et al. (2015). Health outcomes of obtaining housing among older homeless adults. American Journal of Public Health, 105, 1482–1488. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2014.302539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, G., Gully, S. M., & Eden, D. (2001). Validation of a new general self-efficacy scale. Organizational Research Methods, 4, 62–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dark-Freudeman, A., & West, R. L. (2016). Possible selves and self-regulatory beliefs: Exploring the relationship between health selves, health efficacy, and psychological well-being. The International Journal of Aging & Human Development, 82, 139–165. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091415015627666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Vries, H. (2016). Self-efficacy: Skip the main factor paradigm! A comment on Williams and Rhodes (2016). Health Psychology Review, 10, 140–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2016.1163234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dempster, M., & Donnelly, M. (2008). Validity of the perceived health competence scale in a UK primary care setting. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 13, 123–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/13548500701351984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 276–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Downing, S. M. (2003). Validity: On the meaningful interpretation of assessment data. Medical Education, 37, 830–837. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2923.2003.01594.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eller, L. S., Lev, E. L., Yuan, C., & Watkins, A. V. (2016). Describing self-care self-efficacy: Definition, measurement, outcomes, and implications. International Journal of Nursing Knowledge. https://doi.org/10.1111/2047-3095.12143.

  • Epel, E. S., Bandura, A., & Zimbardo, P. G. (1999). Escaping homelessness: The influences of self-efficacy and time perspective on coping with homelessness. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29, 575–596. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1999.tb01402.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, D. B., & Kubota, M. (2015). Hope, self-efficacy, optimism, and academic achievement: Distinguishing constructs and levels of specificity in predicting college grade-point average. Learning and Individual Differences, 37, 210–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2014.11.022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finney, S. J., & DiStefano, C. (2013). Nonnormal and categorical data in structural equation modelling. In G. R. Hancock & R. O. Mueller (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: A second course (2nd ed., pp. 439–492). USA: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flora, D. B., & Flake, J. K. (2017). The purpose and practice of exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis in psychological research: Decisions for scale development and validation. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 49, 78–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gadermann, A. M., Guhn, M., & Zumbo, B. D. (2012). Estimating ordinal reliability for Likert-type and ordinal item response data: A conceptual, empirical, and practical guide. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 17, 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guarnaccia, V., & Henderson, J. J. (1993). Self-efficacy, interpersonal competence, and social desirability in homeless people. Journal of Community Psychology, 21, 335–338. https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6629(199310)21:4<335::AID-JCOP2290210409>3.0.CO;2-O.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horn, J. L., & McArdle, J. J. (1992). A practical and theoretical guide to measurement invariance in aging research. Journal of Experimental Aging Research, 18, 117–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huberty, C. J., & Morris, J. D. (1989). Multivariate analysis versus multiple univariate analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 302–308. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.105.2.302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hubley, A. M. (2012). Housing self-efficacy scale. Unpublished measure.

  • Hubley, A. M., & Zumbo, B. D. (2011). Validity and the consequences of test interpretation and use. Social Indicators Research, 103, 219–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hubley, A. M., & Zumbo, B. D. (2013). Psychometric characteristics of assessment procedures: An overview. In K. F. Geisinger (Ed.), APA handbook of testing and assessment in psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 3–19). Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, S. W., Aubry, T., Palepu, A., Farrell, S., Nisenbaum, R., Hubley, A. M., et al. (2011). The health and housing in transition study: A longitudinal study of the health of homeless and vulnerably housed adults in three Canadian cities. International Journal of Public Health, 56, 609–623. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-011-0283-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone, M., Jetten, J., Dingle, G. A., Parsell, C., & Walter, Z. C. (2015). Discrimination and well-being amongst the homeless: The role of multiple group membership. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, article 739.

  • Judge, T. A., Erez, A., & Bono, J. A. (1998). The power of being positive: The relation between positive self-concept and job performance. Human Performance, 11, 167–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, D. (2009). Structural equation modeling: Foundations and extensions (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452226576.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kashdan, T. B., Biswas-Diener, R., & King, L. (2008). Reconsidering happiness: The costs of distinguishing between hedonics and eudaimonia. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 3, 219–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keefer, L., Kiebles, J. L., & Taft, T. H. (2014). The role of self-efficacy in inflammatory bowel disease management: Preliminary validation of a disease-specific measure. Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, 17, 614–620. https://doi.org/10.1002/ibd.21314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luszczynska, A., Gutiérrez-Doña, B., & Schwarzer, R. (2005). General self-efficacy in various domains of human functioning: Evidence from five countries. International Journal of Psychology, 40, 80–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207590444000041.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maccio, E. M., & Schuler, J. T. (2012). Substance use, self-esteem, and self-efficacy among homeless and runaway youth in New Orleans. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 29, 123–136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10560-011-0249-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maciejewski, P. K., Prigerson, H. G., & Mazure, C. M. (2000). Self-efficacy as a mediator between stressful life events and depressive symptoms - differences based on history of prior depression. British Journal of Psychiatry, 176, 373–378. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.176.4.373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magklara, E., & Morrison, V. (2016). The associations of illness perceptions and self-efficacy with psychological well-being of patients in preparation for joint replacement surgery. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 21, 735–742. https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2015.1115109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, R. P. (1985). Factor analysis and related methods. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson, M. H., Hagell, P., & Iwarsson, S. (2015). Psychometric properties of the general self-efficacy scale in Parkinson's disease. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica, 132(2), 89–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/ane.12368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, K. K., Schuttke, A., Alhakeem, A., Donnelly-Swift, E., Keogh, C., O’Carroll, A., et al. (2015). Health, perceived quality of life and health services use among homeless illicit drug users. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 154, 139–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.06.033.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Padden, D. L., Connors, R. A., Posey, S. M., Ricciardi, R., & Agazio, J. G. (2013). Factors influencing a health promoting lifestyle in spouses of active duty military. Health Care for Women International, 34, 674–693. https://doi.org/10.1080/07399332.2012.736572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, J., Reitzes, D. C., & Ruel, E. E. (2016). Preserving and protecting well-being among homeless men. Sociological Perspectives, 59, 201–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731121415591096.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearlin, L. I., & Schooler, C. (1978). The structure of coping. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 19, 2–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peter, C., Cieza, A., & Geyh, S. (2014). Rasch analysis of the general self-efficacy scale in spinal cord injury. Journal of Health Psychology, 19, 544–555. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105313475897.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollard, E. L., & Davidson, L. D. (2001). Foundations of child well-being. UNESCO action research in family and early childhood series. Paris: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ponizovsky, A. M., Levov, K., Schultz, Y., & Radomislensky, I. (2011). Attachment insecurity and psychological resources associated with adjustment disorders. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 81, 265–276. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-0025.2011.01095.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Revelle, W. (2017). Psych: Procedures for personality and psychological research. Evanston: Northwestern University Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=psych.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roos, S. M., Potgieter, J. C., & Temane, M. Q. (2013). Self-efficacy, collective efficacy and the psychological well-being of groups in transition. Journal of Psychology in Africa, 23, 561–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosseel, Y. (2012). Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48, 1–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, M., Styron, T., & David, D. H. (2016). Mental health outreach to persons who are homeless: Implications for practice from a statewide study. Community Mental Health Journal, 52, 56–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-015-9963-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 1069–1081.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryff, C. D., & Keyes, C. L. M. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 719–727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryff, C. D., & Singer, B. (1996). Psychological well-being: Meaning, measurement, and implications for psychotherapy research. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 65, 14–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadow, D., & Hopkins, B. (1993). Resiliency training and empowerment among homeless, substance-abusing veterans. Research Communications in Psychology, Psychiatry and Behaviour, 18, 121–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherbaum, C. A., Cohen-Charash, Y., & Kern, M. J. (2006). Measuring general self-efficacy: A comparison of three measures using item response theory. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66, 1047–1063.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scholz, U., Gutiérrez-Doña, B., Sud, S., & Schwarzer, R. (2002). Is general self-efficacy a universal construct? Psychometric findings from 25 countries. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 18, 242–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schönfeld, P., Brailovskaia, J., Bieda, A., Zhang, X. C., & Margraf, J. (2016). The effects of daily stress on positive and negative mental health: Mediation through self-efficacy. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 16, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijchp.2015.08.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzer, R., & Born, A. (1997). Optimistic self-beliefs: Assessment of general perceived self-efficacy in thirteen cultures. World Psychology, 3, 177–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. (1995). Generalized self-efficacy scale. In J. Weinman, S. Wright, & M. Johnston (Eds.), Measures in health psychology: A user’s portfolio (pp. 35–37). Windsor: NFER-NELSON.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzer, R., & McAuley, E. (2016). The world is confounded: A comment on Williams and Rhodes (2016). Health Psychology Review, 10, 133–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2016.1162667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzer, R., Mueller, J., & Greenglass, E. (1999). Assessment of perceived general self-efficacy on the Internet: Data collection in cyberspace. Anxiety, Stress & Coping: An International Journal, 12, 145–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/10615809908248327.

  • Seilheimer, T. A., & Doyal, G. T. (1996). Self-efficacy and consumer satisfaction with housing. Community Mental Health Journal, 32, 549–559. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02251065.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shakespeare-Finch, J., Rees, A., & Armstrong, D. (2015). Social support, self-efficacy, trauma and well-being in emergency medical dispatchers. Social Indicators Research, 123, 549–565. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-014-0749-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shear, B. R., & Zumbo, B. D. (2013). False positives in multiple regression: Unanticipated consequences of measurement error in the predictor variables. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 73, 733–756. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164413487738.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheer, V. C. (2014). A meta-synthesis of health-related self-efficacy instrumentation: Problems and suggestions. Journal of Nursing Measurement, 22, 77–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherer, M., Maddux, J. E., Mercandante, B., Prentice-Dunn, S., Jacobs, B., & Rogers, R. W. (1982). The self-efficacy scale: Construction and validation. Psychological Reports, 51, 663–671. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1982.51.2.663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slocum-Gori, S. L., & Zumbo, B. D. (2011). Assessing the unidimensionality of psychological scales: Using multiple criteria from factor analysis. Social Indicators Research, 102, 443–461. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-010-9682-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slocum-Gori, S. L., Zumbo, B. D., Michalos, A. C., & Diener, E. (2009). A note on the dimensionality of quality of life scales: An illustration with the satisfaction with life scale (SWLS). Social Indicators Research, 92, 489–496. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-008-9303-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. S., Wallston, K. A., & Smith, C. A. (1995). The development and validation of the perceived health competence scale. Health Education Research, 10, 51–64. https://doi.org/10.1093/her/10.1.51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steenkamp, J.-B. E. M., & Baumgartner, H. (1998). Assessing measurement invariance in cross-national consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 25, 78–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Su, Z., Khoshnood, K., & Forster, S. H. (2015). Assessing impact of community health nurses on improving primary care use by homeless/marginally housed persons. Journal of Community Health Nursing, 32, 161–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370016.2015.1057082.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Seggelen-Damen, I., & van Dam, K. (2016). Self-reflection as a mediator between self efficacy and well-being. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 31, 18–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walter, Z. C., Jetten, J., Parsell, C., & Dingle, G. A. (2015). The impact of self-categorizing as 'homeless' on well-being and service use. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy (ASAP), 15, 333–356. https://doi.org/10.1111/asap.12089.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Washington, O. G. M., & Moxley, D. P. (2003). Group interventions with low-income African American women recovering from chemical dependency. Health and Social Work, 28, 146–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Washington, O. G. M., & Moxley, D. P. (2013). Self-efficacy as a unifying construct in nursing-social work collaboration with vulnerable populations. Nursing Inquiry, 20, 42–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, D. M., & Rhodes, R. E. (2016). The confounded self-efficacy construct: Conceptual analysis and recommendations for future research. Health Psychology Review, 10, 113–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.17432014.17941998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, C. (2009). Factor analysis of the general self-efficacy scale and its relationship with individualism/collectivism among twenty-five countries: Application of multilevel confirmatory factory analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 46, 699–703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2009.01.025.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. (2000). Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 82–91. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, D. W., & Zumbo, B. D. (2015). Resolving the issue of how reliability is related to statistical power: Adhering to mathematical definitions. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 14, 9–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zumbo, B. D. (2007). Validity: Foundational issues and statistical methodology. In C. R. Rao & S. Sinharay (Eds.), Handbook of statistics (Vol. 26: Psychometrics, pp. 45–79). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science B.V.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zumbo, B. D. (2009). Validity as contextualized and pragmatic explanation, and its implications for validation practice. In R. W. Lissitz (Ed.), The concept of validity: Revisions, new directions and applications (pp. 65–82). Charlotte: IAP – Information Age Publishing, Inc..

    Google Scholar 

  • Zumbo, B. D., & Hubley, A. M. (2016). Bringing consequences and side effects of testing and assessment to the foreground. Special issue on Validity. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy, & Practice, 23, 299–303. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2016.1141169.

  • Zumbo, B. D., & Hubley, A. M. (Eds.). (2017). Understanding and investigating response processes in validation research. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zumbo, B. D., & Taylor, S. V. (1993). The construct validity of the extraversion subscales of the Myers-Briggs type indicator. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 25, 590–604. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0078847.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zumbo, B. D., Gelin, M. N., & Hubley, A. M. (2002). The construction and use of psychological tests and measures. Encyclopedia of life support systems (EOLSS): Psychology theme (pp. 1–28). Oxford: Eolss Publishers. http://www.eolss.net [entry,6.27.3.4].

  • Zumbo, B. D., Gadermann, A. M., & Zeisser, C. (2007). Ordinal versions of coefficients alpha and theta for likert rating scales. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 6, 21–29. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0907444909031205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Canadian Institute for Health Research (CIHR) under operating grant MOP-86765 awarded to Drs. Stephen Hwang, Tim Aubry, Susan Farrell, Anita Palepu, James Dunn, Anita Hubley, Jeffrey Hoch, J. David Hulchanski, Fran Klodawsky, and Rosane Nisenbaum and under an Interdisciplinary Capacity Enhancement Grant on Homelessness, Housing and Health (HOA-80066) awarded to Drs. Stephen Hwang, Tim Aubry, Anita Palepu, Anita Hubley, James Dunn, Jeffrey Hoch, J. David Hulchanski, Bruce MacLaurin, Elise Roy, Jeffrey Turnbull, and Catherine Worthington.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sneha Shankar.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shankar, S., Hubley, A.M. & Zumbo, B.D. General, Health-Specific, and Housing-Specific Self-Efficacy Scales: Preliminary Reliability and Validity Evidence with Homeless or Vulnerably Housed Adults. J well-being assess 1, 57–75 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41543-018-0005-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41543-018-0005-1

Keywords

Navigation